Advertisement

Persistence and change of regional new business formation in the national league table

  • Michael FritschEmail author
  • Sandra Kublina
Regular Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

We investigate persistence and change of regional new business formation in West Germany over a period of 30 years. Our indicator is the position of a region in the national ranking. We confirm the role of several sources of this persistence, namely, persistence in regional determinants of new business formation and path dependence in new business formation activity. The results for the role of a distinct regional culture of entrepreneurship are, however, ambiguous. Main factors that are related to changes in the national ranking are the employment share in small businesses, the share of manufacturing employment and a relatively low regional wage level. R&D activities are also conducive for new business formation but become effective only with a time lag.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship New business formation Economic development Regional growth regimes 

JEL classification

L26 R11 M13 J23 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are particularly grateful to Udo Brixy, Georgios Fotopoulos, Francesca Melillo, David J. Storey, Alina Sorgner, Michael Wyrwich and three anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. Financial support from the German Research Foundation (DFG RTG 1411) is gratefully acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

The work of author Sandra Kublina on this paper benefitted from a Grant of the German Research Foundation (DFG); Grant no. DFG RTG 1411.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Lehmann E (2013) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 41:757–774.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson M, Koster S (2011) Sources of persistence in regional start-up rates – evidence from Sweden. J Econ Geogr 11:179–201.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbp069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audretsch DB, Fritsch M (2002) Growth regimes over time and space. Reg Stud 36:113–124.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400220121909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beugelsdijk S (2007) Entrepreneurial culture, regional innovativeness and economic growth. J Evol Econ 17:187–210.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-006-0048-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bosma N, Hessels J, Schutjens V, van Praag M, Verheul I (2012) Entrepreneurship and role models. J Econ Psychol 33:410–424.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caballero RJ, Hammour ML (1994) The cleansing effect of recessions. Am Econ Rev 84:1350–1368.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.151.3712.867-a Google Scholar
  7. Elfenbein DW, Hamilton BH, Zenger TR (2010) The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers. Manag Sci 56:659–681.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Etzioni A (1987) Entrepreneurship, adaptation and legitimation. J Econ Behav Organ 8:175–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(87)90002-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung) (2003) Aktuelle Daten zur Entwicklung der Städte, Kreise und Gemeinden. Vol. 17. Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning, BonnGoogle Scholar
  10. Fotopoulos G (2014) On the spatial stickiness of UK new firm formation rates. J Econ Geogr 14:651–679.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbt011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fotopoulos G, Storey DJ (2017) Persistence and Change in Interregional Differences in Entrepreneurship: England and Wales, 1921–2011. Environ Plan A 49:670–702.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16674336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frenken K, van Oort F, Verburg T (2007) Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Reg Stud 41:685–697.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freytag A, Thurik R (2007) Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross-country setting. J Evol Econ 17:117–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-006-0044-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fritsch M, Falck O (2007) New Business Formation by Industry over Space and Time: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis. Reg Stud 41:157–172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400600928301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fritsch M, Mueller P (2007) The Persistence of Regional New Business Formation-Activity over Time – Assessing the Potential of Policy Promotion Programs. J Evol Econ 17:299–315.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-007-0056-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fritsch M, Storey DJ (2014) Entrepreneurship in a Regional Context – Historical Roots and Recent Developments. Reg Stud 48:939–954.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.892574 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fritsch M, Wyrwich M (2014) The Long Persistence of Regional Levels of Entrepreneurship: Germany 1925 to 2005. Reg Stud 48:955–973.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.816414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fritsch M, Wyrwich M (2019) Regional Trajectories of Entrepreneurship, Knowledge, and Growth―The Role of History and Culture. Springer, Cham.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97782-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fritsch M, Kritikos A, Sorgner A (2015) Why did self-employment increase so strongly in Germany? Entrep Reg Dev 27:307–333.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1048310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ghatak M, Morell M, Sjöström T (2007) Entrepreneurial talent, occupational choice, and trickle up policies. J Econ Theory 137:27–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2006.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greene WH (2008) Econometric Analysis, 6th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.  https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2002.s458 Google Scholar
  22. Hethey T, Schmieder JF (2010) Using Worker Flows in the Analysis of Establishment Turnover – Evidence from German Administrative Data. FDZ-Methodenreport 06–2010 EN, Nuremberg, Research Data Centre of the Federal Employment Agency (BA) at the Institute for Employment Research (IAB) http://doku.iab.de/fdz/reporte/2010/MR_06-10-EN.pdf
  23. Hofstede G, McCrae RR (2008) Personality and culture revisited, linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cult Res 38:52–87.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397103259443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kibler E, Kautonen T, Fink M (2014) Regional Social Legitimacy of Entrepreneurship: Implications for Entrepreneurial Intention and Start-Up Behaviour. Reg Stud 48:995–1015.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.851373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knight FH (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York, Houghton Mifflin  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511751103.011
  26. Laspita S, Breugst N, Heblich D, Patzelt H (2012) Intergenerational transmission of entrepreneurial intentions. J Bus Ventur 27:414–435.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lucas RE (1978) On the Size Distribution of Business Firms. Bell J Econ 9:508–523.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3003596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin R, Sunley P (2006) Path dependence and regional economic evolution. J Econ Geogr 6:395–437.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McClelland DC (1961) The Achieving Society. Van Nostrand Reinhold, Princeton.  https://doi.org/10.1037/14359-000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Minniti M (2005) Entrepreneurship and network externalities. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 57:1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.10.002
  31. Nickell SJ (1996) Competition and corporate Performance. J Polit Econ 104:724–746.  https://doi.org/10.1086/262040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. North DC (1994) Economic performance through time. Am Econ Rev 84:359–368.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2118057 Google Scholar
  33. Noseleit F (2013) Entrepreneurship, structural change, and economic growth. J Evol Econ 23(4):735–766.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-012-0291-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nunn N (2012) Culture and the Historical Process. Econ Hist Dev Reg 27:S108–S126.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2012.664864 Google Scholar
  35. Nunziata L, Rocco L (2016) A tale of minorities: evidence on religious ethics and entrepreneurship. J Econ Growth 21:189–224.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9123-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nunziata L, Rocco L (2018) The Protestant ethic and entrepreneurship: Evidence from religious minorities in the former Holy Roman Empire. Eur J Polit Econ 51:27–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parker S (2009) Why do small firms produce the entrepreneurs? J Soc Econ 38:484–449.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.07.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Qian H, Acs ZJ, Stough RR (2013) Regional systems of entrepreneurship: the nexus of human capital, knowledge and new firm formation. J Econ Geogr 13:559–587.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schindele Y, Weyh A (2011) The direct employment effects of new businesses in Germany revisited: an empirical investigation for 1976–2004. Small Bus Econ 36:353–363.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9218-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spengler A (2008) The Establishment History Panel. Schmollers Jahrbuch J Appl Soc Sci Stud 128:501–509.  https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.128.3.501 Google Scholar
  41. Stel V, André A, Carree M, Thurik R (2005) The Effect of Entrepreneurial Activity on National Economic Growth. Small Bus Econ 24:311–321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1996-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sternberg R (2011) Regional determinants of entrepreneurial activities – theories and empirical evidence. In: Fritsch M (ed) Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 33–57.  https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936493.00007 Google Scholar
  43. Stuart TE, Sorensen O (2003) The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of bio-technology firms. Res Policy 32:229–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00098-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Theil H (1972) Statistical Decomposition Analysis: With Applications in the Social and Administrative Sciences. North-Holland Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  45. Verheul I, Wennekers S, Audretsch DB, Thurik R (2002) An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: policies, institutions and culture. In: Audretsch DB, Thurik R, Verheul I, Wennekers S (eds) Entrepreneurship: Determinants and policy in a European-US comparison. Kluwer, Boston, pp 11–81.  https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47556-1_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williamson O (2000) The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. J Econ Lit 38:595–613.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EonomicsFriedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany
  2. 2.Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH)HalleGermany

Personalised recommendations