Advertisement

Journal of Evolutionary Economics

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 671–705 | Cite as

SMEs and barriers to Eco-innovation in the EU: exploring different firm profiles

  • Giovanni Marin
  • Alberto Marzucchi
  • Roberto Zoboli
Regular Article

Abstract

Eco-innovation is an explicit aim of major EU policy strategies. Many environmental policies de facto require firms to eco-innovate to comply with policy requirements, while the overlap between policy-driven and market-driven eco-innovation strategies is increasingly important for many firms. Barriers to eco-innovation can then emerge as a critical factor in either preventing or stimulating EU strategies, policy implementation, and the green strategies of firms. In this paper we focus on EU-27 SMEs. We single out and explore different firm profiles, considering eco-innovation barriers and engagement. Our analysis is based on a particularly suitable dataset: the Eurobarometer survey on “Attitudes of European entrepreneurs towards eco-innovation”. We identify six clusters of SMEs. These clusters include firms facing either ‘Revealed barriers’ or ‘Deterring barriers’, ‘Cost deterred’ firms, ‘Market deterred’ firms, ‘Non eco-innovators’, and ‘Green champions’. The clusters display substantial differences in terms of eco-innovation adoption. We show that our taxonomy has little overlap with sector classifications. This diversity should be taken into account for successful environmental and innovation policies.

Keywords

Eco-innovation Barriers to innovation SMEs Green strategy 
JEL O33 Q55 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the participants of the EU-SPRI Conference (University of Manchester, June 2014) and the 2014 Conference of the Italian Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (University of Milan, February 2014) for providing feedback on preliminary versions of the manuscript. We also thank three anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions. Alberto Marzucchi and Roberto Zoboli acknowledge the financial support from the project PRIN-MIUR 2010–2011 “Climate changes in the Mediterranean area: scenarios, mitigation policies and technological innovation” (2010S2LHSE). Giovanni Marin and Roberto Zoboli acknowledge the financial support from the 7th Framework Progamme project EMInInn “Environmental Macro Indicator of Innovation” (283002). The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Antonietti R, Marzucchi A (2014) Green tangible investment strategies and export performance: a firm-level investigation. Ecol Econ 108:150–161Google Scholar
  2. Ambec S, Lanoie P (2008) Does it pay to be green? a systematic overview. Acad Manag Perspect 22(4):45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambec S, Cohen MA, Elgie S, Lanoie P (2013) The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Environ Econ Policy 7(1):2–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin J, Lin Z (2002) Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers. Res Policy 31(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1988) The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchard P, Huiban J, Musolesi A, Sevestre P (2013) Where there is a will, there is a way? assessing the impact of obstacles to innovation. Ind Corp Chang 22(3):679–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borghesi S, Costantini V, Crespi F, Mazzanti M (2013) Environmental innovation and socio-economic dynamics in institutional and policy contexts. J Evol Econ 23(2):241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breschi S, Malerba F (1997) Sectoral innovation systems: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics and spatial boundaries. In: Edquist C (ed) Systems of innovation: technologies institutions and organizations. Pinter, London, pp 130–156Google Scholar
  9. Brunnermeier SB, Cohen MA (2003) Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. J Environ Econ Manag 45(2):278–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cainelli G, Mazzanti M (2013) Environmental innovations in services: manufacturing–services integration and policy transmissions. Res Policy 42:1595–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cainelli G, Mazzanti M, Zoboli R (2011) Environmental innovations, complementarity and local/global cooperation: evidence from north-east Italian industry. Int J Techno Policy Manage 11(3/4):328–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cainelli G, Mazzanti M, Montresor S (2012) Environmental innovations, local networks and internationalization. Ind Innov 19(8):697–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. CML, PSI, CSM (2008) ECO-DRIVE: A framework for measuring eco-innovation: typology of indicators based on causal chains, Final Report, FP6-2005-SSP-5-AGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission (2011a) Innovation for a sustainable future: The Eco-innovation Action Plan (Eco-Ap), COM(2011)899 final, Brussels, 15.12.2011Google Scholar
  15. Costantini V, Crespi F (2008) Environmental regulation and the export dynamics of energy technologies. Ecol Econ 66(2):447–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. D’Este P, Iammarino S, Savona M, von Tunzelmann N (2012) What hampers innovation? revealed barriers versus deterring barriers. Res Policy 41(2):482–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. D’Este P, Rentocchini F, Vega JJM (2014) The role of human capital in lowering barriers to engage in innovation: evidence from the Spanish innovation survey. Ind Innov 21(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Marchi V (2012) Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Res Policy 41(3):614–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Del Río P, Carrillo‐Hermosilla J, Könnölä T (2010) Policy strategies to promote Eco‐innovation. J Ind Ecol 14(4):54–557Google Scholar
  20. Del Río P., Peñasco C., Romero‐Jordán D. (2013) Distinctive Features of Environmental Innovazazators: An Econometric Analysis, Business Strategy and the Environment. Early View, DOI:  10.1002/bse.1822
  21. Demirel P, Kesidou E (2011) Stimulating different types of Eco-innovation in the UK: government policies and firm motivations. Ecol Econ 70(8):1546–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Di Stefano G, Gambardella A, Verona G (2012) Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: current findings and future research directions. Research Policy 41(8):1283–1295Google Scholar
  23. EEA (2013) Towards a green economy in Europe. EU environmental policy targets and objectives 2010–2050 (by Asquit M., Marin G., Paleari S, Speck S., Zoboli R.), EEA Report 8/2013, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  24. EEA (2014) Resource-efficient green economy and EU policies (by Zoboli R., Paleari S., Marin G., Mazzanti M., Nicolli F., Montini A., Miceli V., Speck S.), EEA Report 2/2014, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  25. Europe Innova (2008) Sectoral Innovation Watch in Europe. Eco-Innovation. Final Report, MayGoogle Scholar
  26. European Commission (2011b) Attitudes of European entrepreneurs towards eco-innovation, Flash Eurobarometer Survey N 315Google Scholar
  27. Eurostat (2009) The Environmental Goods and Services Sector. A data collection handbook. Eurostat, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  28. Fagerberg J (2003) Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature. J Evol Econ 13(2):125–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fontana R, Guerzoni M (2008) Incentives and uncertainty: an empirical analysis of the impact of demand on innovation. Camb J Econ 32(6):927–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Foxon T, Pearson P (2008) Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. J Clean Prod 16(1):148–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Freeman C (1987) Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Gabel H. L., Sinclair-Desgagné B. (1997) The firm, its routines, and the environment, INSEAD Working Paper 97/05/EPSGoogle Scholar
  33. Galia F, Legros D (2004) Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France. Res Policy 33(8):1185–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. García-Quevedo J., Pellegrino G., Savona M. (2014) Reviving demand-pull perspectives: The effect of demand uncertainty and stagnancy R&D strategy, SPRU Working Paper Series 2014–09Google Scholar
  35. Ghisetti C, Marzucchi A, Montresor S (2015) The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries. Research Policy 44(5):1080–1093Google Scholar
  36. Hair J. F., Black W. C., Babin B. J., Anderson R. E. (2009) Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall Higher Education, 7th EditionGoogle Scholar
  37. Hall BH (2002) The financing of research and development. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 18(1):35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hölzl W, Janger J (2013) Does the analysis of innovation barriers perceived by high growth firms provide information on innovation policy priorities? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 80(8):1450–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Horbach J (2008) Determinants of environmental innovation—new evidence from German panel data sources. Res Policy 37(1):163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Horbach J, Rammer C, Rennings K (2012) Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact – the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecol Econ 78:112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Horbach J, Oltra V, Belin J (2013) Determinants and specificities of Eco-innovations compared to other innovations – an econometric analysis for the french and german industry based on the community innovation survey. Ind Innov 20(6):523–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hottenrott H, Peters B (2012) Innovative capability and financing constraints for innovation: more money, more innovation? Rev Econ Stat 94(4):1126–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Iammarino S, Sanna-Randaccio F, Savona M (2009) The perception of obstacles to innovation foreign multinationals and domestic firms in Italy. Revue d’Économie Industrielle 1:75–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kesidou E, Demirel P (2012) On the drivers of eco-innovations: empirical evidence from the UK. Res Policy 41(5):862–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lanjouw JO, Mody A (1996) Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technologies. Res Policy 25(4):549–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mancusi M. L., Vezzulli A. (2010) R&D, Innovation and Liquidity Constraints, KITeS Working Papers 030, KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Università Bocconi, Milano, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  47. Mazzanti M, Zoboli R (2005) What drives environmental innovation? empirical evidence from a district-based manufacturing system. Econ Politica 22(3):399–438Google Scholar
  48. Mazzanti M., Zoboli R. (2006) Examining the Factors Influencing Environmental Innovations, Nota di Lavoro FEEM, No. 121–2006Google Scholar
  49. Mazzanti M, Zoboli R (2009) Embedding environmental innovation in local production systems: SME strategies, networking and industrial relations. Int Rev Appl Econ 23(2):169–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mazzanti M, Montini A, Zoboli R (2008) Complementarities, firm strategy and environmental innovations: empirical evidence for a local manufacturing system. Environ Sci 5(1):17–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mohnen P, Röller LH (2005) Complementarities in innovation policy. Eur Econ Rev 49(6):1431–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nelson RR (ed) (1993) National systems of innovation: a comparative study. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  54. Pellegrino G., Savona M. (2013) Is Money All? Financing versus Knowledge and Demand Constraints to Innovation, UNI-MERIT Working Paper Series, 2013–029Google Scholar
  55. Piva M, Vivarelli M (2007) Is demand-pulled innovation equally important in different groups of firms? Camb J Econ 31(5):691–70Google Scholar
  56. Porter M (1991) America’s green strategy’. Sci Am 264:168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Porter M, Esty D (1998) Industrial ecology and competitiveness: strategic implications for the firm. J Ind Ecol 2:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Porter M, Van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9:97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rennings K (2000) Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol Econ 32(2):319–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Runhaar H, Tigchelaar C, Vermeulen WJ (2008) Environmental leaders: making a difference a typology of environmental leaders and recommendations for a differentiated policy approach. Bus Strateg Environ 17(3):160–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Savignac F (2008) Impact of financial constraints on innovation: what can be learned from a direct measure? Econ Innov New Technol 17(6):553–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shapira P, Gök A, Klochikhin E, Sensier M (2014) Probing “green” industry enterprises in the UK: a new identification approach. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 85:93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Simon HA (1959) Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. Am Econ Rev 49(3):253–283Google Scholar
  64. Smith K (2000) Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy. Enterp Innov Manag Stud 1(1):73–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tiwari A. K., Mohnen P., Palm F. C., van der Loeff S. S. (2007) Financial Constraint and R&D Investment: Evidence from CIS, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series, 2007–011Google Scholar
  66. Tourigny D, Le CD (2004) Impediments to innovation faced by Canadian manufacturing firms. Econ Innov New Technol 13(3):217–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. UNU-MERIT, ZEW, RISO, ICL, LEIA (2008) MEI - Measuring Eco-Innovation, Draft Final Report, MarchGoogle Scholar
  68. Van den Bergh JC (2007) Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics. J Evol Econ 17(5):521–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Marin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alberto Marzucchi
    • 3
  • Roberto Zoboli
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.IRCrES-CNR Research Institute on Sustainable Economic GrowthNational Research Council of ItalyMilanItaly
  2. 2.OFCE-SciencesPoSophia AntipolisFrance
  3. 3.Department of International Economics, Institutions and DevelopmentCatholic University of MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations