Advertisement

Journal of Evolutionary Economics

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 1037–1065 | Cite as

Lock-in and path dependence: an evolutionary approach to eco-innovations

  • Grazia Cecere
  • Nicoletta Corrocher
  • Cédric Gossart
  • Muge Ozman
Regular Article

Abstract

The article presents an overview of the evolutionary approach to eco-innovations with particular emphasis on the role of lock-in and path dependence. In doing so, it focuses on the processes of radical change and the transition of technological systems that require the co-evolution of technology, firms, institutions and the society as a whole. Starting from clarifying the different notions of eco-innovations used in the literature, the article discusses the issues of lock-in and path dependence, by investigating the technological, organizational, institutional and social processes that strengthen as well as weaken path dependence. To this aim, it draws upon the evolutionary literature and discusses the relevance of path dependence and lock-in processes to understand the development of eco-innovations.

Keywords

Eco-innovation Evolutionary approach Technological change 

JEL Codes

B52 O3 O13 Q13 

References

  1. Abrahamson E (1991) Managerial fads and fashions: the diffusion and rejection of innovations. Acad Manag Rev 16:586–612Google Scholar
  2. Abrahamson E, Rosenkopf L (1997) Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: a computer simulation. Organ Sci 8(3):289–309Google Scholar
  3. Alkemade F, Frenken K et al (2009) A complex systems methodology to transition management. J Evol Econ 19(4):527–543Google Scholar
  4. Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events’. Econ J 99:116–131Google Scholar
  5. Ayres R (1991) Evolutionary economics and environmental imperatives. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 2(2):255–273Google Scholar
  6. Becker MC, Lazaric N et al (2005) Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Ind Corp Chang 14(5):775–791Google Scholar
  7. Bento N (2010) Is carbon lock-in blocking investments in the hydrogen economy? a survey of actors’ strategies. Energy Policy 38(11):7189–7199Google Scholar
  8. Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J Polit Econ 100(5):992–1026Google Scholar
  9. Brem A, Voigt K-I (2009) Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management—insights from the German software industry. Technovation 29(5):351–367Google Scholar
  10. Brouillat E (2009) Recycling and extending product-life: an evolutionary modelling. J Evol Econ 19(3):437–461. doi: 10.1007/s00191-008-0116-6 Google Scholar
  11. Brunnermeier SB, Cohen MA (2003) Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. J Environ Econ Manag 45(2):278–293Google Scholar
  12. Caniëls MCJ, Romijn HA (2008) Strategic niche management: towards a policy tool for sustainable development. Tech Anal Strat Manag 20(2):245–266Google Scholar
  13. Cantono S, Silverberg G (2009) A percolation model of eco-innovation diffusion: the relationship between diffusion, learning economies and subsidies. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(4):487–496Google Scholar
  14. Carley S (2011) Historical analysis of U.S. Electricity markets: reassessing carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 39(2):720–732Google Scholar
  15. Carrillo-Hermosilla J, del Río P et al (2010) Diversity of eco-innovations: reflections from selected case studies. J Clean Prod 18(10–11):1073–1083Google Scholar
  16. Chadha A (2011) Overcoming competence lock-in for the development of radical eco-innovations: the case of biopolymer technology. Ind Innov 18(3):335–350Google Scholar
  17. Chen C (2001) Design for the environment: a quality-based model for green product development. Manag Sci 47(2):250–263Google Scholar
  18. Choi H, Park S et al (2011) Government-driven knowledge networks as precursors to emerging sectors: a case of the hydrogen energy sector in Korea. Ind Corp Chang 20(3):751–787Google Scholar
  19. Christensen C (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark RA, Goldsmith RE (2006) Interpersonal influence and consumer innovativeness. Int J Consum Stud 30(1):34–43Google Scholar
  21. Clarke SF, Roome NJ (1995) Managing for environmentally sensitive technology: networks for collaboration and learning. Tech Anal Strat Manag 7(2):191–216Google Scholar
  22. Coad A, de Haan P et al (2009) Consumer support for environmental policies: an application to purchases of green cars. Ecol Econ 68(7):2078–2086Google Scholar
  23. Cortazar G, Schwartz ES et al (1998) Evaluating environmental investments: a real options approach. Manag Sci 44(8):1059–1070Google Scholar
  24. Costantini V, Crespi F (2013) Public policies for a sustainable energy sector: regulation, diversity and fostering of innovation. J Evol Econ 23(2):401–429Google Scholar
  25. Costantini V, Mazzanti M (2012) On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? the impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Res Policy 41(1):132–153Google Scholar
  26. Cowan R, Gunby P (1996) Sprayed to death: path dependence, lock-in and pest control strategies. Econ J 106(436):521–542Google Scholar
  27. Cowan R, Hulten S (1996) Escaping lock-in: the case of the electric vehicle. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 53:61–79Google Scholar
  28. David PA (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Am Econ Rev 75(2):332–337Google Scholar
  29. Davies A, Brady T (2000) Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions. Res Policy 29(7–8):931–953Google Scholar
  30. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340Google Scholar
  31. De Marchi V (2012) Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Res Policy 41(3):614–623Google Scholar
  32. del Brı́o JÁ, Junquera B (2002) Managerial environmental awareness and cooperation with public governments in Spanish industrial companies. Technovation 22(7):445–452Google Scholar
  33. Den Hond F, Groenewegen P (1996) Environmental technology foresight: new horizons for technology management. Tech Anal Strat Manag 8(1):33–46Google Scholar
  34. Desrochers P (2002) Industrial ecology and the rediscovery of inter‐firm recycling linkages: historical evidence and policy implications. Ind Corp Chang 11(5):1031–1057. doi: 10.1093/icc/11.5.1031 Google Scholar
  35. Dijk M, Kemp R et al. (2011) Incorporating social context and co-evolution in an innovation diffusion model—with an application to cleaner vehicles. J Evol Econ: 1–35Google Scholar
  36. Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res Policy 11(3):147–162Google Scholar
  37. Dosi G, Teece D et al (1992) Toward a Theory of Corporate Coherence: Some Preliminary Remarks. In: Dosi G, Giannetti R, Toninelli PA (eds) Technology and Enterprise in a Historical Perspective. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 185–211Google Scholar
  38. Egyedi T, Spirco J (2011) Standards in transitions: catalyzing infrastructure change. Futur 43(9):947–960Google Scholar
  39. European Commission (2011) Environmental technology action plan (EcoAP), COM/2011/0899 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0899:FIN:EN:PDF
  40. Faber A, Frenken K (2009) Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: towards an evolutionary environmental economics. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(4):462–470Google Scholar
  41. Farla J, Alkemade F et al (2010) Analysis of barriers in the transition toward sustainable mobility in the Netherlands. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77(8):1260–1269Google Scholar
  42. Farrell J, Saloner G (1985) Standardization, compatibility and innovation. Rand J Econ 16:70–83Google Scholar
  43. Foster C, McMeekin A et al (2012) The entanglement of consumer expectations and (eco) innovation sequences: the case of orange juice. Tech Anal Strat Manag 24(4):391–405Google Scholar
  44. Foxon (2002) Technological and institutional ‘lock-in’ as a barrier to sustainable innovation. ICCEPT Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  45. Foxon TJ (2011) A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecol Econ 70(12):2258–2267Google Scholar
  46. Foxon T, Pearson P (2008) Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. J Clean Prod 16(1, Supplement 1):S148–S161Google Scholar
  47. Freeman C (1992) The Economics of Hope: Essays on Technical Change, Economics Growth and the Environment. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Freeman C (1994) The greening of technology. Futur 26(10):1019–1022Google Scholar
  49. Gee S, McMeekin A (2011) Eco-innovation systems and problem sequences: the contrasting cases of US and Brazilian biofuels. Ind Innov 18(3):301–315Google Scholar
  50. Geldermann J, Schollenberger H et al (2007) An integrated scenario analysis for the metal coating sector in Europe. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 74(8):1482–1507Google Scholar
  51. Gerard D, Lave LB (2005) Implementing technology-forcing policies: the 1970 clean Air Act amendments and the introduction of advanced automotive emissions controls in the united states. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 72(7):761–778Google Scholar
  52. Gibbs D, Deutz P, Proctor A (2005) Industrial ecology and eco‐industrial development: a potential paradigm for local and regional development? Reg Stud 39(2):171–183. doi: 10.1080/003434005200059959 Google Scholar
  53. Gladwin T N, Kennelly JJ, Krause TS (1995) Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and research. Acad Manag Rev 20(4):874–907Google Scholar
  54. Goldstein D (2002) Theoretical perspectives on strategic environmental management. J Evol Econ 12(5):495–524. doi: 10.1007/s00191-002-0128-6 Google Scholar
  55. Gossart C (2005) Routines and the sustainable lock-out of Moroccan oil refineries. Technovation 25(12):1468–1475Google Scholar
  56. Gossart C (2008) Routines and the environment: bridging the gaps. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 75(3):416–437Google Scholar
  57. Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizational Ecology. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. Hansen OE, Sondergard B et al (2002) Environmental innovations in small and medium sized enterprises. Tech Anal Strat Manag 14(1):37–56Google Scholar
  59. Hekkert MP, Negro SO (2009) Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(4):584–594Google Scholar
  60. Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Adm Sci Q 35:9–30Google Scholar
  61. Hischier R, Reichart I (2003) The problem of an adequate functional unit: a case study of a printed newspaper, an internet newspaper and a TV broadcast. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(4):201–208. doi: 10.1007/bf02978472 Google Scholar
  62. Horbach J (2008) Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Res Policy 37(1):163–173Google Scholar
  63. Islas J (1997) Getting round the lock-in in electricity generating systems: the example of the Gas turbine. Res Policy 26:49–66Google Scholar
  64. Jacobsson S, Bergek A (2004) Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Ind Corp Chang 13(5):815–849Google Scholar
  65. Janssen MA, Jager W (2002) Stimulating diffusion of green products. J Evol Econ 12(3):283–306Google Scholar
  66. Kammerer D (2009) The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation: Empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany. Ecol Econ 68(8–9):2285–2295Google Scholar
  67. Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition and compatibility. Am Econ Rev 75:424–440Google Scholar
  68. Katz ML, Shapiro C (1986) Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. J Polit Econ 94:822–841Google Scholar
  69. Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) System competition and network effects. J Econ Perspect 8:93–115Google Scholar
  70. Kemp R (1997) Environmental Policy and Technical Change: A Comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instruments. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  71. Kemp R (2007) Integrating environmental and innovation policies. In: Parto S, Herbert-Copley B (eds) Industrial innovation and environmental regulation. United Nations University Press, Paris, pp 258–284Google Scholar
  72. Kemp R (2010) Eco-innovation: definition, measurement and open research issues. Econ Polit 3:397–420Google Scholar
  73. Kemp R, Oltra V (2011) Research insights and challenges on eco-innovation dynamics. Ind Innov 18(3):249–253Google Scholar
  74. Kemp R, Pontoglio S (2011) The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments — a typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecol Econ 72:28–36Google Scholar
  75. Kemp R, Soete L (1992) The greening of technological progress: an evolutionary perspective. Futur 24(5):437–457Google Scholar
  76. Kemp R, Schot J, Hoogma R (1998) Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technol Anal Strat Manag 10(2):175–195Google Scholar
  77. Kesidou E, Demirel P (2012) On the drivers of eco-innovations: empirical evidence from the UK. Res Policy 41(5):862–870. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.005 Google Scholar
  78. Kivimaa P, Mickwitz P (2006) The challenge of greening technologies—environmental policy integration in Finnish technology policies. Res Policy 35(5):729–744Google Scholar
  79. Klewitz J, Hansen EG (2013) Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. J Clean ProdGoogle Scholar
  80. Knot JMC, van den Ende JCM et al (2001) Flexibility strategies for sustainable technology development. Technovation 21(6):335–343Google Scholar
  81. Kwon T-H (2012) Strategic niche management of alternative fuel vehicles: a system dynamics model of the policy effect. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 79(9):1672–1680Google Scholar
  82. Lambert AJD, Boons FA (2002) Eco-industrial parks: stimulating sustainable development in mixed industrial parks. Technovation 22(8):471–484. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00040-2 Google Scholar
  83. Lanjouw JO, Mody A (1996) Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Res Policy 25(4):549–571Google Scholar
  84. Lee JJ, Gemba K et al (2006) Analyzing the innovation process for environmental performance improvement. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 73(3):290–301Google Scholar
  85. Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strateg Manag J 13:111–126Google Scholar
  86. Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annu Rev Sociol 14:319–340Google Scholar
  87. Liebovitz SJ, Margolis S (1995) Path dependence, lock-in and history. J Law Econ Org 11(1):205–266Google Scholar
  88. Lopolito A, Morone P et al (2011) Innovation niches and socio-technical transition: a case study of bio-refinery production. Futur 43(1):27–38Google Scholar
  89. Los B, Verspagen B (2009) Localized innovation, localized diffusion and the environment: an analysis of reductions of CO2 emissions by passenger cars. J Evol Econ 19(4):507–526Google Scholar
  90. Lundvall B (ed) (1992) National Systems of Innovation. Pinters Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  91. Malerba F (2005) Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Econ Innov New Technol 14(1–2):63–82Google Scholar
  92. Maréchal K (2010) Not irrational but habitual: the importance of “behavioural lock-in” in energy consumption. Ecol Econ 69(5):1104–1114Google Scholar
  93. Nameroff TJ, Garant RJ et al (2004) Adoption of green chemistry: an analysis based on US patents. Res Policy 33(6–7):959–974Google Scholar
  94. Nelson RR (1993) National Systems of Innovation: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  95. Nelson RR (2005) Technology. Harvard University Press, Institutions and Economic GrowthGoogle Scholar
  96. Nelson RR, Sampat BN (2001) Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. J Econ Behav Organ 44(1):31–54Google Scholar
  97. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  98. Noailly J (2008) Coevolution of economic and ecological systems. J Evol Econ 18(1):1–29Google Scholar
  99. Noci G, Verganti R (1999) Managing ‘green’ product innovation in small firms. R&D Manag 29(1):3–15Google Scholar
  100. North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  101. O’Connor M (1993) Entropic irreversibility and uncontrolled technological change in economy and environment. J Evol Econ 3(4):285–315Google Scholar
  102. OECD (2000) Knowledge management in the Learning Society. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  103. Oltra V, Saint Jean M (2005) The dynamics of environmental innovations: three stylised trajectories of clean technology. Econ Innov New Technol 14(3):189–212Google Scholar
  104. Oltra V, Saint Jean M (2009) Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: an application to the french automotive industry. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(4):567–583Google Scholar
  105. Paton D, Siegel DS (2005) The economics of corporate social responsibility: an overview of the special issue. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 16(3):309–312Google Scholar
  106. Pierson P (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am Polit Sci Rev 94(2):251Google Scholar
  107. Rehfeld K-M, Rennings K et al (2007) Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: an empirical analysis. Ecol Econ 61(1):91–100Google Scholar
  108. Rennings K (2000) Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol Econ 32(2):319–332Google Scholar
  109. Rennings K, Markewitz P et al (2013) How clean is clean? incremental versus radical technological change in coal-fired power plants. J Evol Econ 23(2):331–355Google Scholar
  110. Roehrich G (2004) Consumer innovativeness. Concepts and measurements. J Bus Res 57:671–677Google Scholar
  111. Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  112. Sandén BA, Hillman KM (2011) A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden. Res Policy 40(3):403–414Google Scholar
  113. Santolaria M, Oliver-Solà J et al (2011) Eco-design in innovation driven companies: perception, predictions and the main drivers of integration. The Spanish example. J Clean Prod 19(12):1315–1323Google Scholar
  114. Sarkis J (1995) Manufacturing strategy and environmental consciousness. Technovation 15(2):79–97Google Scholar
  115. Sartorius C (2006) Second-order sustainability—conditions for the development of sustainable innovations in a dynamic environment. Ecol Econ 58(2):268–286Google Scholar
  116. Schot J, Geels F (2007) Niches in evolutionary theories of technical change. J Evol Econ 17(5):605–622Google Scholar
  117. Schot J, Geels FW (2008) Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Tech Anal Strat Manag 20(5):537–554Google Scholar
  118. Sharma S, Henriques I (2005) Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strateg Manag J 26(2):159–180Google Scholar
  119. Sharma S, Vredenburg H (1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg Manag J 19:729–753Google Scholar
  120. Shrivastava P (1995) Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 16:183–200Google Scholar
  121. Sinclair-Desgagné B, Soubeyran A (2000) A Theory of Routines as Mindsavers, CIRANO Working Papers - Scientific Series. CIRANO, MontréalGoogle Scholar
  122. Smith A, Raven R (2012) What is protective space? reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Res Policy 41(6):1025–1036Google Scholar
  123. Smith A, Kern F et al (2014) Spaces for sustainable innovation: solar photovoltaic electricity in the UK. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 81:115–130Google Scholar
  124. Taylor MR, Rubin ES et al (2005) Control of SO2 emissions from power plants: a case of induced technological innovation in the U.S. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 72(6):697–718Google Scholar
  125. Technopolis (2008) SYSTEMATIC Eco-innovation Report, Final report for Sectoral innovation watch Technopolis GroupGoogle Scholar
  126. Triguero A, Moreno-Mondéjar L et al (2013) Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecol Econ 92:25–33Google Scholar
  127. Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging. Strateg Manag J 21(10–11):1147–1161Google Scholar
  128. Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Adm Sci Q 31:439–465Google Scholar
  129. van den Bergh J (2007) Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics. J Evol Econ 17(5):521–549. doi: 10.1007/s00191-006-0054-0 Google Scholar
  130. van den Heuvel STA, van den Bergh JCJM (2009) Multilevel assessment of diversity, innovation and selection in the solar photovoltaic industry. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 20(1):50–60Google Scholar
  131. Van der Vooren A, Alkemade F et al (2012) Effective public resource allocation to escape lock-in: the case of infrastructure-dependent vehicle technologies. Environ Innov Societal Trans 2:98–117Google Scholar
  132. Verheul H, Vergragt PJ (1995) Social experiments in the development of environmental technology: a bottom-up perspective. Tech Anal Strat Manag 7(3):315–326Google Scholar
  133. Veugelers R (2012) Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating? Res Policy 41(10):1770–1778Google Scholar
  134. Vona F, Patriarca F (2011) Income inequality and the development of environmental technologies. Ecol Econ 70(11):2201–2213Google Scholar
  135. Wagner M (2008) Empirical influence of environmental management on innovation: evidence from Europe. Ecol Econ 66(2–3):392–402Google Scholar
  136. Wagner M, Llerena P (2011) Eco-innovation through integration, regulation and cooperation: comparative insights from case studies in three manufacturing sectors. Ind Innov 18(8):747–764Google Scholar
  137. Walsh PR (2012) Innovation nirvana or innovation wasteland? identifying commercialization strategies for small and medium renewable energy enterprises. Technovation 32(1):32–42Google Scholar
  138. Weitzman ML (1998) The Noah’s ark problem. Econometrica 66:1279–1298Google Scholar
  139. Windrum P, Ciarli T et al (2009) Consumer heterogeneity and the development of environmentally friendly technologies. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(4):533–551Google Scholar
  140. Wirth S, Markard J (2011) Context matters: how existing sectors and competing technologies affect the prospects of the swiss Bio-SNG innovation system. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78(4):635–649Google Scholar
  141. Witt U (1997) ‘Lock-in’ vs. ‘critical masses’—industrial change under network externalities. Int J Ind Organ 15:753–773Google Scholar
  142. Woersdorfer JS, Kaus W (2011) Will nonowners follow pioneer consumers in the adoption of solar thermal systems? Empirical evidence for northwestern Germany. Ecol Econ 70(12):2282–2291Google Scholar
  143. Zeppini P, van den Bergh JCJM (2011) Competing recombinant technologies for environmental innovation: extending Arthur’s model of lock-in. Ind Innov 18(3):317–334Google Scholar
  144. Ziegler A, Seijas Nogareda J (2009) Environmental management systems and technological environmental innovations: exploring the causal relationship. Res Policy 38(5):885–893Google Scholar
  145. Zutshi A, Sohal A (2004) A study of the environmental management system (EMS) adoption process within Australasian organisations—2 role of stakeholders. Technovation 24(5):371–386Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grazia Cecere
    • 1
    • 3
  • Nicoletta Corrocher
    • 2
  • Cédric Gossart
    • 1
  • Muge Ozman
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut Mines-Télécom/Télécom École de ManagementÉvryFrance
  2. 2.CRIOS, Bocconi UniversityMilanItaly
  3. 3.RITMUniversité Paris SudSceauxFrance

Personalised recommendations