Advertisement

Journal of Evolutionary Economics

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 653–687 | Cite as

Competition, R&D and innovation: testing the inverted-U in a simultaneous system

  • Michael PenederEmail author
  • Martin Woerter
Regular Article

Abstract

To address the relationship between innovation and competition we jointly estimate the opportunity, production, and impact functions of innovation in a simultaneous system. Based on Swiss micro-data, we apply a 3-SLS system estimation. The findings confirm a robust inverted-U relationship, in which a rise in the number of competitors at low levels of initial competition increases the firm’s research effort, but at a diminishing rate, and the research effort ultimately decreases at high levels of competition. When we split the sample by firm types, the inverted-U shape is steeper for creative firms than for adaptive ones. The numerical solution indicates three particular configurations of interest: (i) an uncontested monopoly with low innovation; (ii) low competition with high innovation; and (iii) a ‘no innovation trap’ at very high levels of competition. The distinction between solution (i) and (ii) corresponds to Arrow’s positive effect of competition on innovation, whereas the difference between outcomes (ii) and (iii) captures Schumpeter’s positive effect of market power on innovation. Simulating changes of the exogenous variables, technology potential, demand growth, firm size and exports have a positive impact on innovation, while foreign ownership has a negative effect, and higher appropriability has a positive impact on the number of competitors.

Keywords

Innovation Competition Inverted-U Technological regimes Simultaneous system 3-SLS estimation 

JEL Codes

L11 L22 L41 M13 O33 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper has benefitted from critical comments and thoughtful considerations provided at numerous discussions and presentations at conferences or seminars, e.g. at KOF-ETH, WIFO, SPRU, IPTS, IIOC, or ISS. Among these, we are most indebted to Michael Pfaffermayr and Serguei Kaniovski as well as Esben Sloth Andersen, Spyros Arvanitis, Harald Badinger, Harry Bloch, Herbert Dawid, Erik Dietzenbacher, Kurt Dopfer, Giovanni Dosi, Peter Egger, Peter Fleissner, Klaus Gugler, Heinz Hollenstein, Werner Hölzl, Andreas Reinstaller, Manuel Wäckerle, Carl-Christian von Weizsäcker, Ulrich Witt, Christine Zulehner and two anonymous referees. We are also grateful to Eva Sokoll and Astrid Nolte for their invaluable technical assistance.

References

  1. Aghion P, Griffith R (2005) Competition and growth. Reconciling theory and evidence. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60:323–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aghion P, Howitt P (2009) The economics of growth. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship. Q J Econ 120:701–728Google Scholar
  5. Alder S (2010) Competition and innovation: does the distance to the technology frontier matter? University of Zürich, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics. Working Paper No. 493Google Scholar
  6. Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2010) The credibility revolution in empirical economics: how better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. J Econ Perspect 24(2):3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arrow K (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson R (ed) The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 609–626Google Scholar
  8. Artes J (2009) Long-run versus short-run decisions: R&D and market structure in Spanish firms. Res Policy 38:120–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloch H, Eaton BC, Rothschild R (2012) Does market size matter? A dynamic model of oligopolistic market structure, featuring costs of creating and maintaining a market position, mimeoGoogle Scholar
  10. Blundell R, Griffith R, van Reenen J (1999) Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev Econ Stud 66:529–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boone J (2008a) Competition: theoretical paramaterizations and empirical measures. J Inst Theor Econ 164(4):587–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boone J (2008b) A new way to measure competition. Econ J 118(531):1245–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Breschi S, Malerba F, Orsenigo L (2000) Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Econ J 110:388–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castellacci F (2010) How does competition affect the relationship between innovation and productivity? Estimation of a CDM model for Norway. Econ Innov New Technol 19:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castellacci F, Zheng J (2010) Technological regimes, Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and firm-level productivity growth. Ind Corp Chang 19(6):1829–1865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cellini R, Lambertini L (2005) R&D incentives and market structure: dynamic analysis. J Optim Theory Appl 126:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cellini R, Lambertini L (2011) R&D incentives under Bertrand competition: a differential game. Japan Econ Rev 62(3):387–400Google Scholar
  18. Cohen WM (1995) Empirical studies of innovative activity. In: Stoneman P (ed) Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen WM (2010) Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. In: Hall BW, Rosenberg N (eds) Handbook of the economics of innovation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 129–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen WM, Levin R (1989) Empirical studies of R&D and market structure. In: Schmalensee R, Willig R (eds) Handbook of industrial organization. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1059–1107Google Scholar
  21. Correa JA (2012) Innovation and competition: an unstable relationship. J Appl Econ 27:160–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crandall RW, Jackson CL (2011) Antitrust in high-tech industries. Rev Ind Organ 38(4):319–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crépon B, Duguet E, Mairesse J (1998) Research and development, innovation and productivity: an econometric analysis at the firm level. Econ Innov New Technol 7(2):115–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Czarnitzki D, Etro F, Kraft C (2011) Endogenous market structures and innovation by leaders: an empirical test. Working Paper No. 04/WP/2011, University of Venice (Department of Economics)Google Scholar
  25. Darai D, Sacco D, Schmutzler A (2010) Competition and innovation: an experimental investigation. Exp Econ 13:439–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dasgupta P, Stiglitz J (1980) Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity. Econ J 90(358):266–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Deaton A (2010) Instruments, randomization, and learning about development. J Econ Lit 48:424–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. De Bondt R (1977) Innovative activities and barriers to entry. Eur Econ Rev 10:95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. De Bondt R, Vandekerckhove J (2012) Reflections on the relation between competition and innovation. J Ind Compet Trade 12(1):7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Delbono F, Denicolo V (1991) Incentives to innovate in a cournot oligopoly. Q J Econ 106:951–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geroski PA (1995) Market structure, corporate performance and innovative activity. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Geroski PA (2003) Competition in markets and competition for markets. J Ind Compet Trade 3(3):151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gilbert R (2006) Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: where are we in the competition-innovation debate? In: Jaffe AB, Lerner J, Stern S (eds) Innovation policy and the economy, vol 6, pp 159–215Google Scholar
  34. Gilbert RJ, Newberry DMG (1982) Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. Am Econ Rev 72(3):514–526Google Scholar
  35. Gilbert RJ, Newberry DMG (1984) Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly: reply. Am Econ Rev 74(1):251–253Google Scholar
  36. Gottschalk S, Janz N (2001) Innovation dynamics and endogenous market structure. Econometric results from aggregated survey data. ZEW Discussion Paper 01–39, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  37. Grossman GM, Shapiro C (1987) Dynamic R&D competition. Econ J 97(386):372–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hashmi AR, Van Biesebroeck J (2010) Market structure and innovation: a dynamic analysis of the global automobile industry. NBER Working Paper 15959. http://www.nber.org/papers/w15959
  39. Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (1972) Timing of innovations under rivalry. Econometrica 40:43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (1974) Patent life and R&D rivalry. Am Econ Rev 64(1):183–187Google Scholar
  41. Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (1976) On the degree of rivalry for maximum innovative activity. Q J Econ 90:245–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kraft K (1989) Market structure, firm characteristics and innovative activity. J Ind Econ 37:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leamer EE (2010) Tantalus on the road to asymptopia. J Econ Perspect 24(2):31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee T, Wilde L (1980) Market structure and innovation: a reformulation. Q J Econ 94:395–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Levin RC, Cohen WM, Mowery DC (1985) R&D appropriability, opportunity and market structure: new evidence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses. Am Econ Rev Proc 75:20–24Google Scholar
  46. Loury GC (1979) Market structure and innovation. Q J Econ 93(3):395–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Madansky A (1964) On the efficiency of three-stage least squares estimation. Econometrica 32:55Google Scholar
  48. Malerba F (2007) Innovation and the dynamics and evolution of industries: progress and challenges. Int J Ind Organ 25:675–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Malerba F, Orsenigo L (1993) Technological regimes and firm behaviour. Ind Corp Chang 2(1):45–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Malerba F, Orsenigo L (1997) Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Ind Corp Chang 6:83–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mansfield E (1963) Size of firm, market structure, and innovation. J Polit Econ 76(6):556–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nickel S (1996) Competition and corporate performance. J Polit Econ 104:724–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Owen BM (2011) Antitrust and vertical integration in “new economy” industries with application to broadband access. Rev Ind Organ 38(4):363–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pearl J (2009) Causality, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peneder M (2009) The meaning of entrepreneurship: a modular concept. J Ind Compet Trade 9(2):77–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peneder M (2010) Technological regimes and the variety of innovation behavior: creating integrated taxonomies of firms and sectors. Res Policy 39:323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Polder M, Veldhuizen E (2012) Innovation and competition in the Netherlands: testing the inverted U for industries and firms. J Ind Compet Trade 12(1–2):67–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reinganum JF (1985) A two-stage model of research and development with endogenous second mover advantages. Int J Ind Org 3:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reinganum JF (1989) The timing of innovation: research, development and diffusion. In: Schmalensee R, Willig R (eds) Handbook of industrial organization. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  60. Sacco D, Schmutzler A (2011) Is there a U-shaped relation between competition and investment? Int J Ind Organ 29(1):65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Santos CD (2010) Competition, product and process innovation: an empirical analysis. IVIE Working Paper WP-AD 2010-26Google Scholar
  62. Scherer FM (1967a) Market structure and the employment of scientists and engineers. Am Econ Rev 57:524–531Google Scholar
  63. Scherer FM (1967b) Research and development resource allocation under rivalry. Q J Econ 81:359–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schmutzler A (2010) The relation between competition and innovation—why is it such a mess? University of Zurich. Discussion Paper No. 0716Google Scholar
  65. Schumpeter JA (1911) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, 4th edn. Duncker & Humblot, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  66. Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. Schumpeter JA (1947) The creative response in economic history. J Econ Hist 7(2):149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Scott JT (2009) Competition in research and development: a theory for contradictory predictions. Rev Ind Organ 34:153–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shapiro C, Lerner J (2011) Competition and innovation: did arrow hit the bull’s eye? In: Stern S (ed) The rate and direction of inventive activity revisited. NBER, Cambridge. (Quote from draft)Google Scholar
  70. Sutton J (1991) Sunk costs and market structure. Price competition, advertising and the evolution of concentration. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  71. Sutton J (1998) Technology and market structure. Theory and history. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  72. Tang J (2006) Competition and innovation behavior. Res Policy 35:68–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tingvall PG, Poldahl A (2006) Is there really an inverted U-shaped relation between competition an R&D. Econ Innov New Technol 15(2):101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tishler A, Milstein I (2009) R&D wars and the effects of innovation on the success and survivability of firms in oligopoly markets. Int J Ind Organ 27:519–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Van der Wiel H (2010) Competition and innovation: together a tricky rollercoaster for productivity. Tilburg University, TilburgGoogle Scholar
  76. Vives X (2008) Innovation and competitive pressure. J Ind Econ 56:419–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Winter SG (1984) Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. J Econ Behav Organ 5:287–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wright JD (2011) Does antitrust enforcement in high tech markets benefit consumers? Stock price evidence from FTC v. Intel. Rev Ind Organ 38(4):387–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO)ViennaAustria
  2. 2.ETH Zurich, Swiss Economic Institute (KOF)ZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations