Journal of Evolutionary Economics

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 901–916 | Cite as

Why Schumpeter has had so little influence on today’s main line economics, and why this may be changing

Regular Article
First Online:

Abstract

While Schumpeter’s broad theory of how capitalist economies worked articulated in his Theory of Economic Development received strong attention in his lifetime, it was neoclassical economic theory that took hold of the profession in the last half of the twentieth century, and today few economists even read Schumpeter. The first part of this essay considers the reasons why Schumpeter largely has been ignored. However, recent developments have increased the interests of economists in innovation and in innovation driven economic activity, and the time now may be ripe for a renaissance of Schumpeterian economics. The second part of this essay provides a sketch of what an economics text-book, written from a Schumpeterian perspective, might look like.

Keywords

Schumpeter Innovation Creative destruction Evolutionary economics 

JEL Classification

B52 D01 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Andersen ES (2011) Joseph A. Schumpeter. Palgrave-Macmillan, ChippenhamGoogle Scholar
  2. Chandler A (1962) Strategy and structure. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Chandler A (1990) Scale and scope. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Cyert R, March J (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  5. Dopfer K (ed) (2005) The evolutionary foundations of economics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Dosi G, Nelson R (2010) Technical change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes. In: Hall B, Rosenberg N (eds) Economics of innovation. North Holland Handbooks in Economics, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. Dosi G, Nelson RR, Winter S (eds) (2000) The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedman M (1953) The methodology of positive economics. In: Essays in positive economics. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. Giere R (1988) Explaining science. University Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Kitcher P (2003) Darwin’s achievement. In: In Mendel’s mirror. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. March J, Simon H (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. McCraw T (2007) Prophet of innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and creative destruction. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Minsky H (1976) John Maynard Keynes. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Nelson R R (1998) The agenda for growth theory: a different point of view. Cambr J Econ 22(4):497–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nelson RR (2003) On the uneven evolution of human know-how. Res Policy 32:900–922Google Scholar
  16. Nelson RR (2012a) Some features of research by economists on technological change foreshadowed by the rate and direction of inventive activity. In: Lerner J, Stern S (eds) The rate and direction of inventive activity revisited. University of Chicago Press for the NBER, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Nelson RR (2012b) Demand and supply and their interaction on markets as seen from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory. J Evol Econ 22. doi: 10.1007/s00191-012-0274-4
  18. Nelson RR, Consoli D (2010) An evolutionary theory of household consumption behavior. J Evol Econ 20:665–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nelson RR, Sampat B (2001) Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. J Econ Behav Organ 44:31–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nelson RR, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Salter WEG (1966) Productivity and technical change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Samuelson P (1981) Schumpeter as an economic theorist. In: Frisch H (ed) Schumpeterian economics. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Schumpeter J (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Schumpeter J (1939) Business cycles: a theoretical historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Schumpeter J (1950) Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Simon H (1957) Models of Man. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Solow R (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39:312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Swedberg R (1991) Joseph A. Schumpeter: his life and works. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Teece D (2009) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Winter S (2006) Towards a Schumpeterian theory of the firm. Ind Corp Change 15:125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations