Generalized Darwinian evolutionary theory has emerged as central to the description of economic process (e.g., Aldrich et al., J Evol Econ 18:577–596, 2008). Just as Darwinian principles provide necessary, but not sufficient, conditions for understanding the dynamics of social entities, so too the asymptotic limit theorems of information theory instantiate another set of necessary conditions that constrain socioeconomic evolution. These restrictions can be formulated as a statistics-like analytic toolbox for the study of empirical data that is consistent with generalized Darwinism, but escapes the intellectual straightjacket of replicator dynamics. The formalism is a coevolutionary theory in which punctuated convergence to temporary quasi-equilibira is inherently nonequilibrium, involving highly dynamic ‘languages’ rather than system stable points.
Cognition Coevolution Competition Information theory Interaction Punctuated equilibrium Selection
B52 C61 D02 L10 P50 Z10
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The author thanks a reviewer for remarks useful in revision.
Stoelhorst J (2005) The naturalist view of universal Darwinism: an application of evolutionary theory to the firm. In Finch J, Orillard M (eds) Complexity and the economy: implications for economic policy. Cheltenham, UK, pp 127–147Google Scholar
Stoelhorst J (2008) The explanatory logic and ontological commitments of generalized Darwinism. J Econ Method 15:343–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace R (2005) Consciousness: a mathematical treatment of the global neuronal workspace model. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar