Advertisement

Journal of Evolutionary Economics

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 183–199 | Cite as

The role of domestic savings in outward-oriented growth strategies

  • Flora BelloneEmail author
Regular Article

Abstract

This paper presents a theory of technological catching-up in which local savings plays a key complementary role to international finance and foreign technology. Until now, the literature has primarily emphasized “outward orientation” as the key ingredient of catching-up success. It has indeed been argued that countries which have relied intensively on foreign technologies, either through capital goods imports or foreign direct investment inflows, have been successful while countries which have opted for inward-oriented growth strategy relying on domestic investment and import-substitution strategies have been unsuccessful. In this paper, we develop a sequential model of industrialization in which domestic savings is key to the success of outward-oriented growth strategies. Indeed, internal finance helps to overcome time-to-adjustment constraints which occur in the early phases of the catching-up process when both advanced foreign technologies and backward domestic ones co-exist. In this model, external finance, though international borrowing, and domestic savings are complementary, not substitutable, in the course of technological catching-up.

Keywords

Catching-up Growth Technology transfers Neo-Austrian theory 

JEL Classification

O11 O33 

References

  1. Abramovitz M (1986) Catching-up, forging ahead and falling behind. J Econ Hist XLVI(2):385−406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion P, Comin D, Howitt P (2006) When does domestic savings matter for economic growth? NBER Working Paper No. 12275. NBER, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Amendola M, Gaffard JL (1988) The innovative choice. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Amendola M, Froeschle C, Gaffard J-L, Lega E (2001) Round-about production, co-ordination failure, technological change, and the wage-employment dilemma. J Econ Behav Organ Elsevier 46(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumol WJ (1986) Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: what the long-run data show. Am Econ Rev 76:1072–1085Google Scholar
  6. Belloc B (1980) Croissance économique et adaptation du capital productif. Economica, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellone F, Dalpont M (2003) Does finance matter for growth? The new growth theory facing the East Asian “productivity puzzle”. In: Hagemann H, Seiter S (eds) New developments in growth theory and growth policy. Routledge, London, pp 40−62Google Scholar
  8. Cantalupi M, Nardini F, Ricottili M (1992) A development strategy with foreign borrowing: a neo-Austrian approach. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 3(2):201–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caroll CD, Overland J, Weil DN (2000) Savings and growth with habit formation. Am Econ Rev 90:341–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins S, Bosworth B (1996) Economic Growth in East Asian: Accumulation versus Assimilation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2:135–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gomulka S (1990) The theory of technological change and economic growth. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Grossman G, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Fagerberg J (1987) A technology gap approach to why rates differ. Res Policy 16(2-4):87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fagerber J (1995) Convergence or divergence? The impact of technology on why growth rates differ. J Evol Econ 5(3):269–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hicks J (1973) Capital and time. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Levine R (1997) Financial development and economic growth: views and agenda. J Econ Lit XXXV:688–726Google Scholar
  17. Lucas R (1993) Making a miracle. Econometrica 61(2):251–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nardini F (1993) Traverse and convergence in the neo-Austrian model: the case of a distributive shock. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 4(1):105−125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rodriguez F, Rodrik D (2000) Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence. In: Bernanke B, Rogoff KS (eds) Macroeconomics annual 2000. MIT for NBER, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Romer PM (1986) Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth. J Polit Econ, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(5), pp 1002–1037Google Scholar
  21. Solow RM (1956) A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Q J Econ 70:65–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stiglitz J (1996) Financial market, public policy and the East Asian miracle. World Bank Res Obs 11(2):249–276Google Scholar
  23. Temple J (1999) The new growth evidence. J Econ Lit 37(1):112–156Google Scholar
  24. Temple J, Johnson PA (1998) Social capability and economic growth. Q J Econ 113(3):965–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Verspagen B (1991) A new empirical approach to catching up and falling behind. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 2:359–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zamagni S (1984) Ricardo and Hayek effects in a fixwage model of traverse. Oxf Econ Pap 39:135–151Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GREDEG, UMR No. 6227CNRS, University of NiceSophia-AntipolisFrance

Personalised recommendations