Advertisement

Journal of Evolutionary Economics

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 1–23 | Cite as

The evolution of IT innovations in Swedish organizations: a Darwinian critique of ‘Lamarckian’ institutional economics

  • Mikael SandbergEmail author
Regular Article

Abstract

Fundamental correspondence and analogies between the evolution of technological and biological innovations call for an ‘innovation Darwinian’, ‘universal Darwinian’ or ‘memetic’ approach to understanding technology innovation. Neo-institutional, in fact pseudo-Lamarckian evolutionary economic theory, represented by North, Nelson and Winter, Freeman and others, is criticized. Pseudo-Lamarckian (“by volition”) evolution is explained and analyzed on Darwinian grounds (as intentional and artificial selection), as is Schumpeter’s definitions of creative and imitative innovation. Data from a web survey among Swedish public and private organizations in 1999 are studied. Data show that Darwinian co-evolutionary interaction between producers and users or clients provide essential conditions and stronger influence on creative IT innovations than both ‘Lamarckian’ strategies and competition.

Keywords

Information technologies Meme Evolutionary economics Institutions Darwinism 

Jel Classification

B 520 O 300 O 310 O 380 O 520 

References

  1. Åberg M, Sandberg M (2003) Social capital and democratisation. Roots of trust in post-communist Poland and Ukraine. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of co-operation. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett W (1990) The organizational ecology of a technological system. Adm Sci Q 35:31–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett WP, Hansen MT (1996) The red queen in organizational evolution. Strateg Manage J 17:139–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett WP, McKendrick D (2001) The organizational evolution of global technological competition. Working paper. Stanford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett WP, Greve RH, Park Y (1994) An evolutionary model of organizational performance. Strateg Manage J 15:11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bass Frank (1969) ‘A new product growth for model consumer durables’. Manage Sci 15:215–227, (January)Google Scholar
  8. Blackmore S (1999) The meme machine. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Brodie R (1996) Virus of the mind. The new science of the meme. Integral, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell DT (1965) Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. In: Barringer H, Blanksten GI, Mack RW (eds) Social change in developing areas. A reinterpretation of evolutionary theory. Schemkman, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Cloak FT (1973) Elementary self-replicating instruction and their works: toward a radical reconstruction of general anthropology through a general theory of natural selection. Paper presented at the ninth international congress of anthropological and ethnographical sciencesGoogle Scholar
  12. Cloak FT (1976) Is cultural ethology possible. Human Ecology 3(3):161–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. David PA (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Am Econ Rev 75(2):332–337, MayGoogle Scholar
  14. Darwin C ([1859] 1968) The origin of species by means of natural selection. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype. The gene as the unit of selection. Freeman, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Dawkins R (1983) Universal Darwinism. In: Bendall DS (ed) Evolution from molecules to men. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Dawkins R (1986) The blind watchmaker. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Dennett DC (1991) Darwin’s dangerous idea. Evolution and the meanings of life. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Dennett DC (1996) Kinds of minds. Towards an understanding of consciousness. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Distin K (2005) The selfish meme. A critical reassessment. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res Policy 11:147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Durham WH (1991) Coevolution. Genes, culture and human diversity. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Freeman C (1992) The economics of hope. Essays on technical change, economic growth and the environment. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Hodgson GH (1993) Economics and evolution. Bringing life back into economics. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Hodgson GH (2001a) Is social evolution Lamarckian or Darwinian? In: Laurent J, Nightingale J (eds) Darwinism and evolutionary economics. Edward Elgar, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  27. Hodgson GH (2001b) Darwin, Veblen and the problem of causality in economics. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 23:383–422Google Scholar
  28. Hodgson GH (2002) Darwinism in economics. From analogy to ontology. J Evol Econ 12:259–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hodgson GH (2003) The mystery of the routine: the Darwinian destiny of an evolutionary theory of economic change. Revue Economique 54(2):355–384, marsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hodgson GH, Knudsen T (2006) Dismantling Lamarckism: why descriptions of socio-economic evolution as Lamarckian are misleading. J Evol Econ (on line, forthcoming in printed version)Google Scholar
  31. Högselius P (2005) The dynamics of innovation in Eastern Europe: the making of the telecommunications system of innovation in Estonia and its integration with Sweden and Finland, Cheltenham: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  32. Hull DL (1982) The naked meme. In: Plotkin HC (ed) Learning, development, and culture: essays in evolutionary epistemology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Knudsen T (2001) Nesting Lamarckism within Darwinian explanations: necessity in economics and possibility in biology? In: Laurent J, Nightingale J (eds) Darwinism and evolutionary economics. Edward Elgar, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  34. Knudsen T (2002) Economic selection theory. J Evol Econ 12:443–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lamarck JB ([1809] 1884) Zoological philosophy. An exposition with regard to the natural history of animals. (Philosophie zoologique, ou exposition des considerations relative à l’histoire naturelle des animaux). The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  36. Langton J (1979) Darwinism and the behavioral theory of sociocultural evolution: an analysis. Am J Sociol 85(2):288–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strateg Manage J 14:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lundvall B-Å (1988) Innovation as an interactive process: from user–producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G, Soete L (eds) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Lundvall B-Å (1992) User–producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalisation. In: Lundvall B-Å (ed) National systems of innovation. Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Lynch A (1996) Thought contagion. How belief spreads through society. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Matthews RCO (1984) Darwinism and economic change. In: Collard DA, Dimsdale NH, Gilbert CL, Helm DR, Scott MFG, Sen AK (eds) Economic theory and Hicksian themes. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Mayer E (1976) Evolution and diversity of life. Selected essays. The Belknap, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  43. Mokyr J (1991) Evolutionary biology, technological change and economic history. Bulletin of Economic Research 43(2):127–149. Reprint in Hodgson. In: GM (ed) (1995) Economics and Biology. Aldershot, Edward Elgar, pp 471–493Google Scholar
  44. Nelson R (2001) Preface. In: Laurent J, Nightingale J (eds) Darwinism and evolutionary economics. Edward Elgar, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  45. Nelson R, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  46. North D (1997) Economic performance through time: the limits to knowledge. A paper presented at the 1997 conference of the International Society for New International EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  47. Norton, John, Bass Frank (1987) “A diffusion theory of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high-technology products”. Manage Science 33:1069–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Plotkin H (1994) Darwin machines and the nature of knowledge. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Ridley M (1996) Evolution, 2nd edn. Blackwell, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosenberg M (1968) The logic of survey analysis. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Sandberg M (1998) Institutional change and organisational learning of information technologies: four evolutionary questions ‘why?’ A paper prepared for the EAEPE Conference in Lisbon, 5–8 November 1998Google Scholar
  53. Sandberg M (1999a) Green post-communism? Environmental aid, polish innovation and evolutionary political economics. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Sandberg M (1999b) “Lamarckian” vs. “Darwinian” evolution of IT in Swedish Public and Private Organisations: some preliminary results from a web questionnaire survey. A paper presented at the European association for evolutionary political economy (EAEPE) conference in Prague, November 4–7, 1999Google Scholar
  55. Sandberg M (2000) De politiska och ekonomiska uttrycksarternas uppkomst genom institutionell selektion: några steg mot en evolutionär politisk ekonomi. (“The origin of political and economic expression ‘species’ by means of institutional selection: Some steps toward an evolutionary political economics”) Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift. J Polit Sci 103(2):115–148, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  56. Sandberg M (2001) IT-spridningen i svenska organisationer ur institutionellt-evolutionärt perspektiv: resultat från en web-survey 1999. (“IT diffusion in Swedish organisations from an institutional-evolutionary perspective: results from a web survey in 1999”), Ekonomiska Samfundets Tidskrift. Journal of The Economic Association 1:25–38, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  57. Sandberg M (2003) “Hur växer demokratin fram? Dynamisk (evolutionär) komparation och några metodtest på europeiska regimdata” (“How does democracy evolve? Dynamic (evolutionary) comparison and some methodological tests on European regime data”), Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift. J Polit Sci 106:281–320, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  58. Schumpeter J ([1934] 2005) The theory of economic development. Transaction, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  59. Sonea S (1991) Bacterial evolution without speciation. In: Margulis L, Fester R (eds) Symbiosis as a source of evolutionary innovation. Speciation and morphogenesis. MIT, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  60. Thompson JN (1984) The coevolutionary process. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  61. Tinbergen N (1963) ‘On aims and methods in Ethology’. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20:410–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van Valen L (1973) A new evolutionary law. Evol Theory 1:1–30Google Scholar
  63. Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology. Cambridge, Massachusetts, BelknapGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Halmstad UniversityHalmstadSweden

Personalised recommendations