Journal of Evolutionary Economics

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 543–560 | Cite as

Routines, genes and program-based behavior

Regular Article

Abstract

It is argued that the ‘routines as genes’ and the ‘routines as skills’ analogies are misleading in several respects. Neither genes, nor skills, nor routines program behavior, if this is taken to involve, first, that they do so in a way that excludes conscious, deliberate choice and, second, that they determine behavior. On a proper understanding of ‘gene’, ‘skill’ and ‘routine’, conscious, deliberate choice is not ruled out when genes, skills or routines are operating. Once we shift from analogy to ontology, genes and skills appear as basic constituents of routines. Routines cannot exist unless specific genes and skills are in place in the individuals involved in the operation of the routines. Both genes and skills can be said to act unconsciously as ‘If ..., then ...’ programs. Even complete knowledge of genes and skills of the individuals involved would fall far short of predicting individual and firm behavior, however. What would still be missing, it is argued, is knowledge about organization, the specific ways in which genes, skills and individuals are connected with one another, and knowledge of context-dependence, what environmental stimuli activate specific chains of genes, skills and individuals.

Keywords

Routines Genes Skills Program-based behavior Proximate causes of individual and firm behavior 

JEL Classification

A12 B41 B52 D21 D23 

References

  1. Becker Markus C (2003) The concept of routines twenty years after Nelson and Winter (1982): a review of the literature (DRUID Working Paper No 03–06)Google Scholar
  2. Berninghaus Siegfried, Werner Güth, Hartmut Kliemt (2003) From teleology to evolution. Bridging the gap between rationality and adaptation in social explanation. J Evol Econ 13:385–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen Michael D, Bacdayan Paul (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: evidence from a laboratory study. Organ Sci 5(4):554–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen Michael D, Burkhart Roger, Dosi Giovanni, Egidi Massimo, Marengo Luigi, Warglien Massimo, Winter Sidney (1996) Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: contemporary research interests. Ind Corp Change 5(3):653–699Google Scholar
  5. Dawkins Richard (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Foster J (1997) The analytical foundations of evolutionary economics: from biological analogy to economic self-organisation. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 8:427–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hodgson Geoffrey M (1997) Economics and evolution and the evolution of economics. In: Reijnders Jan (ed) Economics and Evolution. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 9–40Google Scholar
  8. Hodgson Geoffrey M (2003) The mystery of the routine: the Darwinian destiny of an evolutionary theory of change. Revue Écon 54(2) 355–384, MarsGoogle Scholar
  9. Hodgson Geoffrey M, Knudsen Thorbjørn (2003) The firm as an interactor: firms as vehicles for habits and routines, Mimeo Google Scholar
  10. Hodgson Geoffrey M, Knudsen Thorbjørn (2006) Why we need a generalized Darwinism: and why generalized Darwinism is not enough. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  11. Hutchins Edwin (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT, 1995Google Scholar
  12. Kandel ER (2001) The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses. Science 294:1030–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kandel Eric, Mack Sarah (2003) A parallel between radical reductionism in science and in art. Ann NY Acad Sci 1001:272–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Loasby Brian J (1991) Equilibrium and evolution : an exploration of connecting principles in economics. Manchester University Press, Manchester, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  15. Loasby Brian J (1999) Knowledge, institutions, and evolution in economics. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. March James C, Simon Herbert A (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Marcus G (2004) The birth of the mind: how a tiny number of genes creates the complexities of human thought. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Mayr Ernst (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134 1501–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nelson Richard R (1995) Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. J Econ Lit 39:48–90Google Scholar
  21. Nelson Richard R (2004) Evolutionary theories of cultural change: an empirical perspective, Papers on Economics and Evolution (Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena) #0422Google Scholar
  22. Nelson Richard R, Winter Sidney G (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  23. Pentland Brian T, Rueter Henry (1994) Organisational routines as grammars of action. Adm Sci Q 39:484–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Samuels R, Stich S, Tremoulet P (1999) Rethinking rationality: from bleak implications to Darwinian modules. In: Lepore E, Pylyshyn Z (eds) What is cognitive science? Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Samuels R, Stich S, Bishop M (2002) Ending the rationality wars: How to make disputes about human rationality disappear. In: Elio R (ed) Common sense, reasoning and rationality. Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science 11. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Sarkar Sahotra (2004) Genes encode information for phenotypic traits. In: Hitchcock Christopher (ed) Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 259–289Google Scholar
  27. Sen Amartya (1999) Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Silverman Paul H (2004) Rethinking genetic determinism. The Scientist 18(10):32, May 24Google Scholar
  29. Sober Elliott (1984) The nature of selection. MIT, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  30. Sober Elliott (2000) The meaning of genetic causation. In: Buchanan Allen, Brock Dan W, Daniels Norman, Daniel Wikler (eds) From chance to choice: genetics & justice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Vanberg Viktor J (2002) Rational choice vs. program-based behavior. Ration Soc 14(1):7–54Google Scholar
  32. Vanberg Viktor J (2004) The rationality postulate in economics: its ambiguity, its deficiency and its evolutionary alternative. J Econ Methodol 11(1):1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vromen JJ (1995) Economic evolution: an enquiry into the foundations of new institutional economics. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Vromen JJ (2001) The human agent in evolutionary economics. In: Laurent John, Nightingale John (eds) Darwinism and evolutionary economics. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  35. Vromen JJ (2004a) Conjectural revisionary economic ontology: outline of an ambitious research agenda for evolutionary economics. J Econ Methodol (Symposium: Ontological Issues in Evolutionary Economics) 11(2):213–247Google Scholar
  36. Vromen JJ (2004b) Traces from the past: why and how past evolutionary processes matter (paper presented at EAEPE-Conference in Crete, October 2004)Google Scholar
  37. Witt U (1993) Evolutionary economics: some principles. In: Witt Ulrich (ed) Evolution in markets and institutions. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Witt U (2003) The evolving economy: essays on the evolutionary approach to economics. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  39. Witt U (2004) On the proper interpretation of ‘evolution’ in economics and its implications for production theory. J Econ Methodol (Symposium: Ontological Issues in Evolutionary Economics) 11(2):125–146Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EIPE, Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations