GPS satellite inter-frequency clock bias estimation using triple-frequency raw observations
- 116 Downloads
This study proposes a unified uncombined model to estimate GPS satellite inter-frequency clock bias (IFCB) in both triple-frequency code and carrier-phase observations. In the proposed model, the formulae of both phase-based and code-based IFCBs are rigorously derived. Specifically, satellite phase-based IFCB refers to its time-variant part and it is modeled as a periodic function related to the sun–spacecraft–earth angle. A zero-mean condition of all available GPS satellites that support triple-frequency data is introduced to render satellite code-based IFCB estimable. Three months of data from 40 globally distributed stations of the International GNSS Service Multi-GNSS Experiment are used to test our method. The results show that the four-order periodic function is suitable for eliminating the 12-h, 6-h, 4-h, and 3-h periods that exist in the a posteriori phase residuals when no periodic function is used. For comparison, the geometry-free and ionosphere-free (GFIF) phase combination and differential code bias (DCB) products released by DLR (German Aerospace Center) and IGG (Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, China) are also used to calculate the satellite phase-based and code-based IFCBs, respectively. The results show that (1) the average root mean square (RMS) of the phase-based IFCB difference between the proposed method and the GFIF phase combination is 4.3 mm; (2) the average RMS in the eclipse period increased by 50% compared with the average RMS in the eclipse-free period; (3) the mean monthly STD for code-based IFCB from the proposed method is 0.09 ns; and (4) the average RMS values of code-based IFCB differences between the proposed method and the DCB products released by DLR and IGG are 0.32 and 0.38 ns. This proposed model also provides a general approach for multi-frequency GNSS applications such as precise orbit and clock determination.
KeywordsGPS GNSS Inter-frequency clock bias Differential code bias Raw observations Geometry-free Ionosphere-free combination
This work was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41804024, 41931075, 41804026, 41574027). The authors are grateful to the editors and reviewers for their valuable comments on improving our manuscript. We would also like to thank International GNSS Service (IGS) for providing GPS data and products, and German Aerospace Center (DLR) and Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (IGG) for providing multi-frequency DCB products. The GPS observation data and IGS final orbit and clock products are obtained from the CDDIS (ftp://cddis.nasa.gov/pub/gps/data/). The GPS P1-C1 DCB products are achieved from the CODE (ftp.unibe.ch/aiub/CODE/2016/). The GPS multi-frequency DCB products are available at ftp://igs.ign.fr/pub/igs/products/mgex/dcb.
C. Shi, L. Fan, and J. Zhang designed the research; L. Fan, G. Jing, and M. Li performed the research; M. Li, C. Wang, and F. Zheng analyzed the data; and L. Fan wrote the paper.
- Feltens J, Schaer S (1998). IGS products for the ionosphere. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IGS analysis centers workshop, ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany, 9–11 Feb 1998Google Scholar
- IGS R-S (2013). RINEX: the receiver independent exchange format (RINEX) Version 3.02. Technical report, IGS Central BureauGoogle Scholar
- Kouba J (2009a) A guide to using International GNSS Service (IGS) products. International GNSS, Geodetic Survey Division of Natural Resources Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
- Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Prange L, Deng Z, Zhao Q, Perosanz F, Romero I, Noll C, Stürze A, Weber G (2017) The Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the international GNSS service (IGS)—achievements, prospects and challenges. Adv Space Res 59(7):1671–1697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Petit G, Luzum B and Al E (2010). IERS conventions (2010). IERS Technical Note 36: 1–95. http://www.iers.org/TN36/
- Roma-Dollase D, Hernández-Pajares M, Krankowski A, Kotulak K, Ghoddousi-Fard R, Yuan Y, Li Z, Zhang H, Shi C, Wang C, Feltens J, Vergados P, Komjathy A, Schaer S, García-Rigo A, Gómez-Cama JM (2018) Consistency of seven different GNSS global ionospheric mapping techniques during one solar cycle. J Geod 92(6):691–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1088-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schaer S, Steigenberger P (2006) Determination and use of GPS differential code bias values. In: Proceedings of IGS workshop, Darmstadt, 8–11 MayGoogle Scholar
- Schönemann E, Springer T, Dilssner F, Enderle W and Zandbergen R (2014) GNSS analysis in a multi-GNSS and multi-signal environment. In: Proceedings of IGS workshop, Pasadena, Califorlia, USA, 23–27 JuneGoogle Scholar
- Wu JT, Wu SC, Hajj GA, Bertiger WI, Lichten SM (1993) Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase. Manuscr Geod 18(2):91–98Google Scholar