Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 93, Issue 10, pp 2053–2067 | Cite as

A modified phase clock/bias model to improve PPP ambiguity resolution at Wuhan University

  • Jianghui GengEmail author
  • Xingyu Chen
  • Yuanxin Pan
  • Qile Zhao
Original Article


Precise point positioning ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR) is a valuable tool for high-precision geodetic observations, while phase bias products are critical to implementing GNSS PPP-AR. Based on the conventional integer clock and uncalibrated phase delay (UPD) models, we proposed a modified phase clock/bias model to enable undifferenced ambiguity fixing where it is the phase clocks, rather than the International GNSS Service (IGS) legacy clocks, which are estimated in a network solution by first correcting carrier-phase data for both pre-resolved integer ambiguities and predetermined phase biases. Such phase clock/bias product is compatible with IGS legacy clock and code bias products as opposed to the integer clock model, while ensuring more accurate daily positions in contrast to the UPD model. We carried out precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity fixing using 1 year of GPS data from about 500 stations and took the IGS weekly solutions as benchmarks: The phase clock/bias model reproduced the positioning achievement of the integer clock model without biasing pseudorange processing, whereas improving markedly the east component of daily positions by 20% compared to the UPD model; interestingly, negligible differences exist between the UPD-based hourly positions and those based on the phase clock/bias model, corroborating that the UPD model is a good approximation to the phase clock/bias model in case of short observation periods. Finally, since phase biases are linearly dependent on clocks, we suggest to compute daily phase bias products, instead of the usual 15-min UPDs, by driving all their temporal variations to the phase clocks, which will greatly facilitate ambiguity-fixed PPP (


PPP Uncalibrated phase delay Integer clock Decoupled clock model 



This work is funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Nos. 2018YFC1503601, 2016YFB0501802) and National Science Foundation of China (No. 41674033). We are grateful to IGS for the high-quality GPS data and satellite products. This work is taken as a contribution from Wuhan University Analysis Center to the new IGS Working Group “PPP-AR”. We thank the high-performance computing facility at Wuhan University where all computational work of this study were accomplished.

Author Contributions

JG devised the project and the main conceptual ideas. JG and XC worked out almost all of the technical details and performed the numerical calculations for the suggested experiments; XC and YP analyzed the data; JG wrote the paper; and QZ provided research assistance on precise satellite products. All authors provided critical feedback and helped to shape the research, analysis and manuscript.


  1. Banville S, Collins P, Zhang W, Langley R (2014) Global and regional ionospheric corrections for faster PPP convergence. Navigation 61(2):115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boehm J, Niell AE, Tregoning P, Schuh H (2006) The Global Mapping Function (GMF): a new empirical mapping function based on data from numerical weather model data. Geophys Res Lett 33:L07304. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boehm J, Heinkelmann R, Schuh H (2007) Short note: a global model of pressure and temperature for geodetic applications. J Geod 81(10):679–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collins P, Bisnath S, Lahaye F, Héroux P (2010) Undifferenced GPS ambiguity resolution using the decoupled clock model and ambiguity datum fixing. J Inst Navig 57(2):123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dach R, Brockmann E, Schaer S, Beutler G, Meindl M, Prange L, Bock H, Jäggi A, Ostini L (2009) GNSS processing at CODE: status report. J Geod 83(3–4):353–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Defraigne P, Bruyninx C (2007) On the link between GPS pseudorange noise and day-boundary discontinuities in geodetic time transfer solutions. GPS Solut 11(4):239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dong D, Bock Y (1989) Global positioning system network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. J Geophys Res 94(B4):3949–3966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ge M, Gendt G, Dick G, Zhang FP, Rothacher M (2006) A new data processing strategy for huge GNSS global networks. J Geod 80(4):199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geod 82(7):389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geng J, Bock Y (2016) GLONASS fractional-cycle bias estimation across inhomogeneous receivers for PPP ambiguity resolution. J Geod 90(4):379–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geng J, Chen X (2018) Phase bias product and open-source software for undifferenced ambiguity resolution at Wuhan University. In: IGS workshop 2018, Wuhan, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  12. Geng J, Meng X, Dodson AH, Teferle FN (2010) Integer ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning: method comparison. J Geod 84(9):569–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geng J, Teferle FN, Meng X, Dodson AH (2011) Towards PPP-RTK: ambiguity resolution in real-time precise point positioning. Adv Space Res 47(10):1664–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geng J, Shi C, Ge M, Dodson AH, Lou Y, Zhao Q, Liu J (2012) Improving the estimation of fractional-cycle biases for ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning. J Geod 86(8):579–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geng J, Chen X, Pan Y, Mao S, Li C, Zhou J, Zhang K (2019) PRIDE PPP-AR: an open-source software for GPS PPP ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut 23:91. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guo J, Geng J (2018) GPS satellite clock determination in case of inter-frequency clock biases for triple-frequency precise point positioning. J Geod 92(10):1133–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias JP, Broca P, Cerri L (2009) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination. J Inst Navig 56(2):135–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li P, Zhang X, Guo F (2017) Ambiguity resolved precise point positioning with GPS and BeiDou. J Geod 91(1):25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loyer S, Perosanz F, Mercier F, Capdeville H, Marty JC (2012) Zero-difference GPS ambiguity resolution at CNES-CLS IGS analysis center. J Geod 86(11):991–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Melbourne WG (1985) The case for ranging in GPS-based geodetic systems. In: Proceedings of first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, Rockville, MD, pp 373–386Google Scholar
  21. Montenbruck O, Hugentobler U, Dach R, Steigenberger P, Hauschild A (2011) Apparent clock variations of the Block IIF-1 (SVN62) GPS satellite. GPS Solut 16(3):303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nadarajah N, Khodabandeh A, Wang K, Choudhury M, Teunissen P (2018) Multi-GNSS PPP-RTK: from large- to small-scale networks. Sensors 18(4):1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Petit G, Luzum B (eds) (2010) IERS Conventions (2010) Verlag des Bundes für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, p 179Google Scholar
  24. Saastamoinen J (1973) Contribution to the theory of atmospheric refraction: refraction corrections in satellite geodesy. Bull Geod 107(1):13–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmid R, Dach R, Collilieux X, Jäggi A, Schmitz M, Dilssner F (2016) Absolute IGS antenna phase center model igs08.atx: status and potential improvements. J Geod 90(4):343–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Teunissen PJG (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J Geod 70(1–2):65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wu JT, Wu SC, Hajj GA, Bertiger WI, Lichten SM (1993) Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase. Manuscr Geodaet 18(2):91–98Google Scholar
  28. Wübbena G (1985) Software developments for geodetic positioning with GPS using TI-4100 code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of first international symposium on precise positioning with the Global Positioning System, Rockville, MD, pp 403–412Google Scholar
  29. Zhang B, Chen Y, Yuan Y (2018a) PPP-RTK based on undifferenced and uncombined observations: theoretical and practical aspects. J Geod. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang X, Zhu F, Zhang Y, Freeshah M, Zhou W (2018b) The improvement in integer ambiguity resolution with INS aiding for kinematic precise point positioning. J Geod. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102(B3):5005–5017CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GNSS Research CenterWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations