Correcting surface loading at the observation level: impact on global GNSS and VLBI station networks
- 278 Downloads
Time-dependent mass variations of the near-surface geophysical fluids in atmosphere, oceans and the continental hydrosphere lead to systematic and significant load-induced deformations of the Earth’s crust. The Earth System Modeling group of Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (ESMGFZ) provides vertical and horizontal surface deformations based on numerical models of the global geophysical fluids in atmosphere, oceans and the continental hydrosphere with a spatial resolution of \(0.5^\circ \) and a temporal sampling of down to 3 h (Dill and Dobslaw in J Geophys Res 118(9):5008–5017, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50353). The assessment of conventionally—i.e. without consideration of non-tidal loading models—processed global GNSS datasets reveals that large parts of the residual station coordinates are indeed related to surface loading effects. Residuals explained by the models often have a pronounced annual component, but variability at other periodicities also contributes to generally high correlations for 7-day averages. More than 10 years of observations from about 400 GNSS and 33 VLBI stations were specifically reprocessed for this study to incorporate non-tidal loading correction models at the observation level. Comparisons with the corresponding conventional processing schemes indicate that the coordinate repeatabilities and residual annual amplitudes decrease by up to 13 mm and 7 mm, respectively, when ESMGFZ’s loading models are applied. In addition, the standard deviation of the daily estimated vertical coordinate is reduced by up to 6.8 mm. The network solutions also allow for an assessment of surface loading effects on GNSS satellite orbits, resulting in radial translations of up to 4 mm and Earth orientation parameters (EOP). In particular, the VLBI-based EOP estimates are critically susceptible to surface loading effects, with root-mean-squared differences reaching of up to 0.2 mas for polar motion, and 10 µs for UT1-UTC.
KeywordsGNSS VLBI Non-tidal surface loading GNSS orbits Polar motion
The authors want to thank IGS and IVS for making publicly available GNSS and VLBI observations. All geophysical loading models evaluated herein can be accessed at https://isdc.gfz-potsdam.de/esmdata/loading/. We would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their assistance in evaluating this paper and their helpful recommendations.
HD, BM, and SG defined the study. BM and KB processed the GNSS and VLBI data. All authors contributed to the analysis, interpretation, and discussion of the results. BM prepared the manuscript with major contributions from RD, HD, SG, and KB and inputs from all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
- Balidakis K, Nilsson T, Zus F, Glaser S, Heinkelmann R, Deng Z, Schuh H (2018) Estimating Integrated Water Vapor Trends From VLBI, GPS, and Numerical Weather Models: Sensitivity to Tropospheric Parameterization. J Geophys Res Atmos 123(12):6356–6372. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dill R (2008) Hydrological model LSDM for operational Earth rotation and gravity field variations. Scientific technical report STR, vol 369. GFZGoogle Scholar
- Dobslaw H, Bergmann-Wolf I, Dill R, Poropat L, Thomas M, Dahle C, Esselborn S, König R, Flechtner F (2017) A new high-resolution model of non-tidal atmosphere and ocean mass variability for de-aliasing of satellite gravity observations: AOD1B RL06. Geophys J Int 211:263–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jungclaus JH, Fischer N, Haak H, Lohmann K, Marotzke J, Matei D, Mikolajewicz U, Notz D, von Storch JS (2013) Characteristics of the ocean simulations in the Max Planck Institute Ocean Model (MPIOM) the ocean component of the MPI-Earth system model. J Adv Model Earth Syst 5(2):422–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kennett BLN, Engdahl ER, Buland R (1995) Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes. Geophys J Int 122(1):108–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb03540.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lambeck K (1988) Geophysical geodesy. Clarendon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Nahmani S, Bock O, Bouin MN, Santamaría-Gómez A, Boy JP, Collilieux X, Métivier L, Panet I, Genthon P, de Linage C, Wöppelmann G (2012) Hydrological deformation induced by the West African Monsoon: comparison of GPS. J Geophys Res Solid Earth, GRACE and loading models. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB009102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peltier A, Got JL, Villeneuve N, Boissier P, Staudacher T, Ferrazzini V, Walpersdorf A (2015) Long-term mass transfer at Piton de la Fournaise volcano evidenced by strain distribution derived from GNSS network. J Geophys Res 120(3):1874–1889. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011738 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Petit G, Luzum B (2010) IERS conventions. IERS technical note 36. Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main. ISBN 3-89888-989-6Google Scholar
- Rabbel W, Schuh H (1986) The Influence of Atmospheric Loading on VLBI-Experiments. J Geophys 59(3):164–170Google Scholar
- Roggenbuck O, Thaller D, Engelhardt G, Franke S, Dach R, Steigenberger P (2015) Loading-induced deformation due to atmosphere, ocean and hydrology: model comparisons and the impact on global SLR. VLBI and GNSS solutions. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yan T, Lim S, Rizos C (2009) Performance analysis of real-time GNSS data distribution over the internet. In: Proceedings of SSC2009, Adelaide, Australia, vol 28, pp 491–502Google Scholar