Advertisement

Triple-frequency PPP ambiguity resolution with multi-constellation GNSS: BDS and Galileo

  • Xingxing LiEmail author
  • Xin Li
  • Gege Liu
  • Guolong Feng
  • Yongqiang Yuan
  • Keke Zhang
  • Xiaodong Ren
Original Article
  • 81 Downloads

Abstract

Multi-constellation GNSS (multi-GNSS) and multi-frequency signals open new prospects for fast ambiguity resolution (AR) of precise point positioning (PPP). Currently, all the BDS and Galileo satellites are capable of transmitting signals on three or more frequencies. In this contribution, we investigate the triple-frequency PPP ambiguity resolution with B1, B2 and B3 observations from BDS satellites and E1, E5a and E5b observations from Galileo satellites and evaluate the contribution of BDS + Galileo combination to triple-frequency PPP AR. The uncalibrated phase delay (UPD) products are estimated based on triple-frequency observations, and the temporal characteristic as well as the residual distributions are analyzed. Our results show that the extra-wide-lane (EWL) and wide-lane (WL) UPDs for BDS and Galileo satellites are both stable during the 30 days and the daily narrow-lane (NL) UPD series are also steady with no obvious fluctuation. The Galileo UPDs exhibit better performance than BDS UPDs due to the high-quality observations. It is also interesting to find that the EWL UPD corrections for all Galileo satellites are very close to the zero. With the precise UPD products, the triple-frequency PPP AR with BDS and Galileo observations was implemented in both static and kinematic modes. Compared to the ambiguity-float solution, the performance can be significantly improved by triple-frequency PPP AR with the positioning accuracy improved by 30–70% in both static and kinematic modes. Moreover, the triple-frequency PPP fixed solutions also present better performance than the dual-frequency PPP fixed solutions in terms of time to the first fix and positioning accuracy, especially for the Galileo-only and BDS + Galileo solutions. And the fusion of multi-GNSS (BDS and Galileo) can further improve the position estimations compared to the single system with more satellites and better spatial geometry.

Keywords

Precise point positioning Uncalibrated phase delay Ambiguity resolution Multi-GNSS Multi-frequency 

References

  1. Collins P, Lahaye F, Herous P, Bisnath S (2008) Precise point positioning with AR using the decoupled clock model. In: Proceedings of the ION GNSS 2008, 16–19 September, Savannah, GA, USA, pp 1315–1322Google Scholar
  2. Deng Z, Zhao Q, Springer T, Prange L, Uhlemann M (2014) Orbit and clock determination-BeiDou. IGS workshop, Pasadena, USA, 23.06–27.06.2014Google Scholar
  3. Deo M, El-Mowafy A (2016) Triple-frequency GNSS models for PPP with float ambiguity estimation: performance comparison using GPS. Surv Rev 50(360):249–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dong D, Bock Y (1989) Global positioning system network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. J Geophys Res 94(B4):3949–3966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geod 83(3):191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elsobeiey M (2015) Precise point positioning using triple-frequency gps measurements. J Navig 68(3):480–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feng Y, Li B (2010) Wide area real time kinematic decimetre positioning with multiple carrier GNSS signals. Sci China Ser D 53(5):731–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geng J, Bock Y (2013) Triple-frequency GPS precise point positioning with rapid ambiguity resolution. J Geod 87(5):449–460.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-013-0619-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gu S, Lou Y, Shi C, Liu J (2015) Beidou phase bias estimation and its application in precise point positioning with triple-frequency observable. J Geod 89(10):979–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo F, Zhang X, Wang J, Ren X (2016) Modeling and assessment of triple-frequency bds precise point positioning. J Geod 90(11):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Han S (1997) Quality-control issues relating to instantaneous ambiguity resolution for real-time GPS kinematic positioning. J Geod 71(6):351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kouba J (2009) A guide to using international GNSS service (IGS) products. http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/resource/pubs/UsingIGSProductsVer21.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2018
  13. Kouba J, Héroux P (2001) Precise point positioning using IGS orbit and clock products. GPS Solut 5(2):12–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias JP, Broca P, Cerri L (2009) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination. Navig J Inst Navig 56(2):135–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li X, Zhang X (2012) Improving the estimation of uncalibrated fractional phase offsets for PPP ambiguity resolution. Navigation 65(3):513–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li H, Zhou X, Wu B (2013a) Fast estimation and analysis of the interfrequency clock bias for Block IIF satellites. GPS Solut 17(3):347–355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-012-0283-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li X, Ge M, Zhang H, Wickert J (2013b) A method for improving uncalibrated phase delay estimation and ambiguity-fixing in real-time precise point positioning. J Geod 87(5):405–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li X, Ge M, Dai X, Ren X, Fritsche M, Wickert J, Schuh H (2015) Accuracy and reliability of multi-GNSS real-time precise positioning: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo. J Geod 89(6):607–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li P, Zhang X, Fei G (2016) Ambiguity resolved precise point positioning with GPS and BeiDou. J Geod 2016(91):1–16Google Scholar
  20. Li P, Zhang X, Ge M, Schuh H (2018a) Three-frequency BDS precise point positioning ambiguity resolution based on raw observables. J Geod 1:1.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1125-3 Google Scholar
  21. Li X, Li X, Yuan Y, Zhang K, Zhang X, Wickert J (2018b) Multi-GNSS phase delay estimation and PPP ambiguity resolution: GPS, BDS, GLONASS, Galileo. J Geod 92:579.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1081-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu J, Ge M (2003) PANDA software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination. J Nat Sci Wuhan Univ 8(2B):603–609.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02899825 Google Scholar
  23. Melbourne WG (1985) The case for ranging in GPS-based geodetic systems. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, Rockville, MD, USA, 1985, 5–19 AprilGoogle Scholar
  24. Montenbruck O, Hauschild A, Steigenberger P, Langley RB (2010) Three’s the challenge: a close look at GPS SVN62 triplefrequency signal combinations finds carrier-phase variations on the new L5. GPS World 21(8):819Google Scholar
  25. Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Khachikyan R, Weber G, Langley RB, Mervart L, Hugentobler U (2014) IGSMGEX: preparing the ground for multi-constellation GNSS science. Inside GNSS 9(1):42–49Google Scholar
  26. Pan L, Zhang X, Li X, Jingnan Liu, Xin Li (2017) Characteristics of inter-frequency clock bias for Block IIF satellites and its effect on triple-frequency GPS precise point positioning. GPS Solut 21(2):811–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Teunissen PJG (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J Geod 70(1–2):65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wanninger L, Beer S (2015) Beidou satellite-induced code pseudorange variations: diagnosis and therapy. GPS Solut 19(4):639–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wübbena G (1985) Software developments for geodetic positioning with GPS using TI-4100 code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, Rockville, MD, AprilGoogle Scholar
  30. Yao Z, Zhang J, Lu M (2016) ACE-BOC: dual-frequency constant envelope multiplexing for satellite navigation. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 52(1):466–485.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2015.140607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang XH, Wu MK, Liu WK, Li XX, Yu S, Lv CX, Wickert Y (2017) Initial assessment of the COMPASS/BeiDou-3: new-generation navigation signals. J Geod 1:16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1020-3 Google Scholar
  32. Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102(B3):5005–5017CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xingxing Li
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Xin Li
    • 1
  • Gege Liu
    • 1
  • Guolong Feng
    • 1
  • Yongqiang Yuan
    • 1
  • Keke Zhang
    • 1
  • Xiaodong Ren
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Geodesy and GeomaticsWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ)PotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations