Advertisement

Multi-dimensional particle filter-based estimation of inter-system phase biases for multi-GNSS real-time integer ambiguity resolution

  • Yumiao Tian
  • Zhizhao LiuEmail author
  • Maorong Ge
  • Frank Neitzel
Original Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

In multi-GNSS integration, fixing inter-system double-difference ambiguities to integers is still a challenge due to the existence of inter-system biases (ISB) when mixed types of GNSS receivers are used. It has been shown that when ISB is known, the inter-system ambiguities can be fixed and the reliability of ambiguity fixing can be improved significantly, especially under poor conditions when the number of observed satellites is small. In traditional methods, the intra-system ambiguity is fixed first; then, the ISB is estimated to ultimately fix the inter-system ambiguity. In our work, we use the particle filter-based method to estimate the ISB parameter and fix the inter-system ambiguities to integers at the same time. This method shows higher reliability and higher ambiguity fixing rate. Nevertheless, the existing particle filter approach for ISB parameter estimation is a one-dimensional algorithm. When satellites from three or more systems are observed, there are two or more ISB parameters. We extend the current one-dimensional particle filter approach to multi-dimensional case and estimate multi-ISB parameters in this study. We first present a multi-dimensional particle filter approach that can estimate multi-ISB parameters simultaneously. We also show that the RATIO values can be employed to judge the quality of multi-dimensional ISB values. Afterward, a two-dimensional particle filter approach is taken as an example to validate this approach. For example, in the experiment of GPS L5, Galileo E5a and QZSS L5 integration with 6 satellites using the IGS baseline SIN0-SIN1, only three ambiguities are resolved to integer when the ISBs are unknown. The integer ambiguity fixing rate is 41.0% with 53% of the ambiguity-fixed solutions having positioning errors larger than 3 cm. However, when our approach is adopted, the number of integer ambiguity parameters increases to five. The integer ambiguity fixing rate increases to 99.7% with 100% of ambiguity-fixed solutions having positioning errors smaller than 3 cm.

Keywords

Multi-dimensional particle filter approach Multi-GNSS integration Ambiguity resolution Inter-system bias estimation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Zhizhao Liu thanks the support of Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) Project (PolyU 5203/13E, B-Q37X) and Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Projects 152103/14E, 152168/15E and 1-BBYH) and the grant supports from the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No.: 41730109). Yumiao Tian is supported by the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No.: 41804022) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2682018CX33).

References

  1. Arulampalam S, Maskell S, Gordon N, Clapp T (2002) A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans Sig Process 50(2):174–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blewitt G (1989) Carrier phase ambiguity resolution for the global positioning system applied to geodetic baselines up to 2000 km. J Geophys Res 94(B8):10187–10203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Candy J (2009) Bayesian signal processing: classical, modern and particle filtering methods. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dach R, Brockmann E, Schaer S, Beutler G, Meindl M, Prange L et al (2009) GNSS processing at CODE: status report. J Geod 83(3–4):353–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dong D, Bock Y (1989) Global positioning system network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. J Geophys Res 94(B4):3949–3966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doucet A, Freitas N, Gordon N (2001) Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Euler H, Schaffrin B (1991) On a measure of discernibility between different ambiguity solutions in the static-kinematic GPS-mode. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on kinematic systems in Geodesy, surveying, and remote sensing. Springer, Berlin, pp 285–295Google Scholar
  8. Force D, Miller J (2013) Combined global navigation satellite systems in the space service volume. In: Proceedings of the ION international technical meetingGoogle Scholar
  9. Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geod 82(7):389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gordon J, Salmond J, Smith F (1993) Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation. IEE Proc Radar Signal Process 140(2):107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gustafsson F, Gunnarsson F, Bergman N, Forssell U, Jansson J, Karlsson R, Nordlund P (2002) Particle filters for positioning, navigation, and tracking. IEEE Trans Signal Process 50(2):425–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haug A (2012) Bayesian estimation and tracking: a practical guide. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ineichen D, Brockmann E, Schaer S (2008) Processing combined GPS/GLONASS data at Swisstopo’s local analysis center. In: Proceedings of EUREF symposiumGoogle Scholar
  14. Julien O, Alves P, Cannon EM, Zhang W (2003) A tightly coupled GPS/GALILEO combination for improved ambiguity resolution. In: Proceedings of the European navigation conference (S. 1-14)Google Scholar
  15. Khodabandeh A, Teunissen P (2016) PPP-RTK and inter-system biases: the ISB look-up table as a means to support multi-system PPP-RTK. J Geod 90:837–851.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0914-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kozlov D, Tkachenko M (1997) Instant RTK cm with low cost GPS + GLONASS [TM] C/A receivers. In: Proceedings of ION GPS 1997, Kansas City, MO, September 1997, pp 1559–1570Google Scholar
  17. Kubo N, Tokura H, Pullen S (2018) Mixed GPS-BeiDou RTK with inter-systems bias estimation aided by CSAC. GPS Solut 22:5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-017-0670-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li X, Ge M, Dai X, Ren X, Mathias F, Jens W (2015) Accuracy and reliability of multi-GNSS real-time precise positioning: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo. J Geod 89(6):607–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Melgard T, Tegedor J, Jong K, Lapucha D, Lachapelle G (2013) Interchangeable integration of GPS and Galileo by using a common system clock in PPP. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS, Nashville, TN, September 2013, pp 16–20Google Scholar
  20. Odijk D, Teunissen PJ (2013a) Characterization of between-receiver GPS-Galileo inter-system biases and their effect on mixed ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut 17(4):521–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Odijk D, Teunissen PJ (2013b) Estimation of differential inter-system biases between the overlapping frequencies of GPS, Galileo, BeiDou and QZSS. In: Proceedings of the 4th international colloquium scientific and fundamental aspects of the Galileo programme (S. 4-6). Prague, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  22. Odolinski R, Teunissen PJ, Odijk D (2014) Combined BDS, Galileo, QZSS and GPS single-frequency RTK. GPS Solut 19(1):151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Paziewski J, Wielgosz P (2015) Accounting for Galileo-GPS inter-system biases in precise satellite positioning. J Geod 89(1):81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Teunissen P (1996) GPS carrier phase ambiguity fixing concepts. In: Kleusberg A, Teunissen P (eds) GPS for geodesy. Springer, Berlin, pp 263–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tian Y, Ge M, Neitzel F (2015) Particle filter-based estimation of inter-frequency phase bias for real-time GLONASS integer ambiguity resolution. J Geod 89(11):1145–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tian Y, Ge M, Neitzel F (2016) Particle filter-based estimation of inter-system phase bias for multi-GNSS integer ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-016-0584-3 Google Scholar
  27. Tian Y, Liu Z, Ge M, Neitzel F (2017) Determining inter-system bias of GNSS signals with narrowly spaced frequencies for GNSS positioning. J Geod.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1100-4 Google Scholar
  28. Verhagen S, Teunissen P (2013) The ratio test for future GNSS ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut 17(4):535–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang J, Rizos C, Stewart M, Leick A (2001) GPS and GLONASS integration: modeling and ambiguity resolution issues. GPS Solut 5(1):55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Department of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics (LSGI)The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU)KowloonChina
  3. 3.German Research Centre for GeosciencesPotsdamGermany
  4. 4.Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation ScienceTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  5. 5.State-Province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Spatial Information Technology for High-Speed Railway SafetyChengduChina

Personalised recommendations