Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 91, Issue 5, pp 547–562 | Cite as

Model improvements and validation of TerraSAR-X precise orbit determination

  • S. Hackel
  • O. Montenbruck
  • P. Steigenberger
  • U. Balss
  • C. Gisinger
  • M. Eineder
Original Article
  • 419 Downloads

Abstract

The radar imaging satellite mission TerraSAR-X requires precisely determined satellite orbits for validating geodetic remote sensing techniques. Since the achieved quality of the operationally derived, reduced-dynamic (RD) orbit solutions limits the capabilities of the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) validation, an effort is made to improve the estimated orbit solutions. This paper discusses the benefits of refined dynamical models on orbit accuracy as well as estimated empirical accelerations and compares different dynamic models in a RD orbit determination. Modeling aspects discussed in the paper include the use of a macro-model for drag and radiation pressure computation, the use of high-quality atmospheric density and wind models as well as the benefit of high-fidelity gravity and ocean tide models. The Sun-synchronous dusk–dawn orbit geometry of TerraSAR-X results in a particular high correlation of solar radiation pressure modeling and estimated normal-direction positions. Furthermore, this mission offers a unique suite of independent sensors for orbit validation. Several parameters serve as quality indicators for the estimated satellite orbit solutions. These include the magnitude of the estimated empirical accelerations, satellite laser ranging (SLR) residuals, and SLR-based orbit corrections. Moreover, the radargrammetric distance measurements of the SAR instrument are selected for assessing the quality of the orbit solutions and compared to the SLR analysis. The use of high-fidelity satellite dynamics models in the RD approach is shown to clearly improve the orbit quality compared to simplified models and loosely constrained empirical accelerations. The estimated empirical accelerations are substantially reduced by 30% in tangential direction when working with the refined dynamical models. Likewise the SLR residuals are reduced from \(-3\,\pm \,17\) to \(2\,\pm \,13\) mm, and the SLR-derived normal-direction position corrections are reduced from 15 to 6 mm, obtained from the 2012–2014 period. The radar range bias is reduced from \(-10.3\) to \(-6.1\) mm with the updated orbit solutions, which coincides with the reduced standard deviation of the SLR residuals. The improvements are mainly driven by the satellite macro-model for the purpose of solar radiation pressure modeling, improved atmospheric density models, and the use of state-of-the-art gravity field models.

Keywords

Atmospheric density models Radar ranging Reduced-dynamic orbit determination Satellite macro-model Solar radiation pressure 

References

  1. Altamimi Z, Collilieux X, Métivier L (2011) ITRF2008: an improved solution of the international terrestrial reference frame. J Geod 85(8):457–473. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0444-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balss U, Gisinger C, Cong XY, Eineder M, Brcic R (2013) Precise 2-D and 3-D ground target localization with TerraSAR-X. International archives of the photogrammetry. Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci (ISPRS) XL–1(W1):23–28. doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W1-23-2013 Google Scholar
  3. Balss U, Gisinger C, Cong XY, Brcic R, Hackel S, Eineder M (2014) Precise measurements on the absolute localization accuracy of TerraSAR-X on the base of far-distributed test sites. In: Proceedings of the 10th European conference on synthetic aperture radar (EUSAR). http://elib.dlr.de/89405/1/p993-balss
  4. Barkstrom BR (1984) The earth radiation budget experiment (ERBE). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 65(11):1170–1185. doi:10.1175/1520-0477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barlier F, Berger C, Falin JL, Kockarts G, Thuillier G (1978) A thermospheric model based on satellite drag data. Ann Geophys 34:9–24Google Scholar
  6. Beutler G, Jäggi A, Mervart L, Meyer U (2010) The celestial mechanics approach: theoretical foundations. J Geod 84(10):605–624. doi:10.1007/s00190-010-0401-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bock H, Dach R, Jäggi A, Beutler G (2009) High-rate GPS clock corrections from CODE: support of 1 Hz applications. J Geod 83(11):1083–1094. doi:10.1007/s00190-009-0326-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bock H, Jäggi A, Meyer U, Visser P, van den IJssel J, van Helleputte T, Heinze M, Hugentobler U (2011) GPS-derived orbits for the GOCE satellite. J Geod 85(11):807–818. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0484-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruinsma SL, Sánchez-Ortiz N, Olmedo E, Guijarro N (2012) Evaluation of the DTM-2009 thermosphere model for benchmarking purposes. J Space Weather Space Clim 2(A04):1–14. doi:10.1051/swsc/2012005 Google Scholar
  10. Buckreuss S, Balzer W, Mühlbauer P, Werninghaus R, Pitz W (2003) The TerraSAR-X satellite project. IEEE IGARSS 5:3096–3098. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2003.1294694 Google Scholar
  11. Cerri L, Berthias JP, Bertiger WI, Haines BJ, Lemoine FG, Mercier F, Ries JC, Willis P, Zelensky NP, Ziebart M (2010) Precision orbit determination standards for the Jason series of altimeter missions. Mar Geode 33(S1):379–418. doi:10.1080/01490419.2010.488966 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colombo OL (1989) The dynamics of global positioning system orbits and the determination of precise ephemerides. J Geophys Res 94(B7):9167–9182. doi:10.1029/JB094iB07p09167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook GE (1965) Satellite drag coefficients. Planet Space Sci 13(10):926–946. doi:10.1016/0032-0633(65)90150-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Couhert A, Cerri L, Legeais JF, Ablain M, Zelensky NP, Haines BJ, Lemoine FG, Bertiger WI, Shailen D, Desaie MO (2015) Towards the 1 mm/y stability of the radial orbit error at regional scales. Adv Space Res 55(1):2–23. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2014.06.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dach R, Brockmann E, Schaer S, Beutler G, Meindl M, Prange L, Bock H, Jäggi A, Ostini L (2009) GNSS processing at CODE: status report. J Geod 83(3–4):353–365. doi:10.1007/s00190-008-0281-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dach R, Lutz S, Walser P, Fridez P, Andritsch F, Arnold D, Bertone S, Jäggi A, Jean Y, Maier A, Mervart L, Meyer U, Orliac E, OrtizGeist E, Prange L, Scaramuzza S, Schaer S, Sidorov D, Sušnik A, Villiger A, Baumann C, Beutler G, Bock H, Gäde A, Meindl M, Ostini L, Sośnica K, Steinbach A, Thaller D, Brockmann E, Ineichen D, Hugentobler U, Rodriguez-Solano C, Steigenberger P, Fritsche M, Rülke A (2015) Bernese GNSS software version 5.2. Astronomical Institute. University of Bern, Bern. doi:10.7892/boris.72297 Google Scholar
  17. Doornbos E, Klinkrad H (2006) Modelling of space weather effects on satellite drag. Adv Space Res 37(6):1229–1239. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drob DP, Emmert JT, Crowley G, Picone M, Shepherd GG, Skinner W, Hays P, Niciejewski RJ, Larsen M, She CY, Meriwether JW, Hernandez G, Jarvis MJ, Sipler DP, Tepley CA, O’Brien MS, Bowman JR, Wu Q, Murayama Y, Kawamura S, Reid IM, Vincent RA (2008) An empirical model of the Earths horizontal wind fields: HWM07. J Geophys Res 113(A12):123–139. doi:10.1029/2008JA013668 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eanes RJ, Bettadpur S (1995) The CSR 3.0 global ocean tide model: diurnal and semi-diurnal ocean tides from TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry. Tech. Rep. 6, Center for Space Research, University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  20. Eineder M, Runge H, Boerner E, Bamler R, Adam N, Schättler B, Breit H, Suchandt S (2003) SAR interferometry with TerraSAR-X. In: Proceedings of fringe workshop, Frascati, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  21. Fliegel HF, Gallini TE, Swift ER (1992) Global positioning system radiation force model for geodetic applications. J Geophys Res 97(B1):559–568. doi:10.1029/91JB02564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flohrer C, Otten M, Springer T, Dow J (2011) Generating precise and homogeneous orbits for Jason-1 and Jason-2. Adv Space Res 48(1):152–172. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2011.02.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gerlach C, Földvary L, Švehla D, Gruber T, Wermuth M, Sneeuw N, Frommknecht B, Oberndorfer H, Peters T, Rothacher M, Rummel R, Steigenberger P (2003) A CHAMP-only gravity field model from kinematic orbits using the energy integral. Geophys Res Lett. doi:10.1029/2003GL018025 Google Scholar
  24. Gill E (1996) Smooth bi-polynominal interpolation of Jacchia 1971 atmospheric densities for efficient satellite drag computation. DLR-GSOC IB 96-1, German Aerospace Center (DLR)Google Scholar
  25. Gisinger C, Gernhard S, Auer S, Balss U, Hackel S, Pail R, Eineder M (2015) Absolute 4-D positioning of persistent scatterers with TerraSAR-X by applying geodetic stereo SAR. In: Geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS), 2015 IEEE internationalGoogle Scholar
  26. Haines BJ, Armatys MJ, Bar-Sever YE, Bertiger WI, Desai SD, Dorsey AR, Lane CM, Weiss JP (2011) One-centimeter orbits in near-real time: the GPS experience on OSTM/Jason-2. J Astronaut Sci 58(3):445–459. doi:10.1007/BF03321179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. International Association of Geodesy (2012) International laser ranging service mission priorities as of December 12, 2012. http://ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov/missions/mission_operations/priorities/priorities_20121212.html. Accessed on 25 Feb 2015
  28. International Laser Ranging Service (2015) TerraSAR-X. http://ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov/missions/satellite_missions/current_missions/tsar_general.html. Accessed on 15 Jan 2015
  29. Jacchia LG (1959) Two atmospheric effects in the orbital acceleration of artificial satellites. Nature 183:526–527. doi:10.1038/183526a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jacchia LG (1965) Static diffusion models of the upper atmosphere with empirical temperature profiles. Smithson Contrib Astrophys 8:215–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jacchia LG (1970) New static models of the thermosphere and exosphere with empirical temperature profiles. SAO special report 313Google Scholar
  32. Jacchia LG (1971) Revised static models of the thermosphere and exosphere with empirical temperature profiles. SAO special report 332Google Scholar
  33. Jäggi A, Hugentobler U, Beutler G (2006) Pseudo-stochastic orbit modeling techniques for low-earth orbiters. J Geod 80(1):47–60. doi:10.1007/s00190-006-0029-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jäggi A, Hugentobler U, Bock H, Beutler G (2007) Precise orbit determination for GRACE using undifferenced or doubly differenced GPS data. Adv Space Res 39(10):1612–1619. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jäggi A, Bock H, Prange L, Meyer U, Beutler G (2011) GPS-only gravity field recovery with GOCE, CHAMP, and GRACE. Adv Space Res 47(6):1020–1028. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2010.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jäggi A, Dahle C, Arnold D, Bock H, Meyer U, Beutler G, van den IJssel J (2016) Swarm kinematic orbits and gravity fields from 18 months of GPS data. Adv Space Res 57(1):218–233. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2015.10.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kahle R, Kazeminejad B, Kirschner M, Yoon Y, Kiehling R, D’Amico S (2007) First in-orbit experience of TerraSAR-X flight dynamic operations. In: International symposium on space flight dynamicsGoogle Scholar
  38. Knocke PC, Ries JC, Tapley BD (1988) Earth radiation pressure effects on satellites. In: AIAA/AAS astrodynamics conference, pp 577–587Google Scholar
  39. Kouba J, Héroux P (2001) Precise point positioning using IGS orbit and clock products. GPS Solut 5(2):12–28. doi:10.1007/PL00012883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kouba J, Mireault Y (1998) IGS orbit, clock and EOP combined products: an update. In: Brunner F (ed) Advances in positioning and reference frames, international association of geodesy symposia, vol 118, Springer, pp 245–251. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-03714-0_39
  41. Lederle T (1980) The IAU (1976) system of astronomical constants. Mitteilungen der Astronomischen Gesellschaft 48:59–65Google Scholar
  42. Lichten S (2005) Gipsy-Oasis II: a high precision GPS data processing system and general satellite orbit analysis tool. Tech. rep, Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Pasadena, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  43. Lyard F, Lefevre F, Letellier T, Francis O (2006) Modelling the global ocean tides: modern insights from FES2004. Ocean Dyn 56(5–6):394–415. doi:10.1007/s10236-006-0086-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marshall JA, Luthcke SB (1994) Modeling radiation forces acting on TOPEX/Poseidon for precision orbit determination. J Spacecr Rockets 31(1):99–105. doi:10.2514/3.26408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mayaud PN (1980) Derivation, meaning, and use of geomagnetic indices. In: Geophysical monograph series 22, American Geophysical Union. doi 10.1029/GM022
  46. Mayer-Gürr T, Pail R, Schuh WD, Kusche J, Baur O, Jäggi A (2012) The new combined satellite only model GOCO03s. In: International symposium on gravity, geoid and height systems GGHS2012, Venice, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  47. McCarthy DD (1992) IERS technical note 13. Tech. rep, Central Bureau of IERSGoogle Scholar
  48. McCarthy DD (1996) IERS technical note 21. Tech. rep., U.S. Naval ObservatoryGoogle Scholar
  49. Milani A, Nobili AM, Farinella P (1987) Non-gravitational perturbations and satellite geodesy. Adam Hilger Ltd, BristolGoogle Scholar
  50. Moe K, Moe MM, Wallace SD (1998) Improved satellite drag coefficient calculations from orbital measurements of energy accommodation. J Spacecr Rockets 35(3):266–272. doi:10.2514/2.3350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Montenbruck O, Gill E (2005) Satellite orbits. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  52. Montenbruck O, van Helleputte T, Kroes R, Gill E (2005) Reduced dynamic orbit determination using GPS code and carrier measurements. Aerosp Sci Technol 9(3):261–271. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2005.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Montenbruck O, Andres Y, Bock H, van Helleputte T, van den Ijssel J, Loiselet M, Marquardt C, Silvestrin P, Visser P, Yoon Y (2008) Tracking and orbit determination performance of the GRAS instrument on MetOp-A. GPS Solut 12(4):289–299. doi:10.1007/s10291-008-0091-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Montenbruck O, Garcia-Fernandez M, Yoon Y, Schön S, Jäggi A (2009) Antenna phase center calibration for precise positioning of LEO satellites. GPS Solut 13(13):23–34. doi:10.1007/s10291-008-0094-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Hugentobler U (2015) Enhanced solar radiation pressure modeling for Galileo satellites. J Geod 89(3):283–297. doi:10.1007/s00190-014-0774-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Neubert R, Grunwaldt L, Neubert J (1998) The retro-reflector for the CHAMP satellite: final design and realization. In: Proceedings of the 11th international workshop on laser ranging, Deggendorf, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  57. Pavlis E (2009) SLRF2008: the ILRS reference frame for SLR POD contributed to ITRF2008. In: 2009 ocean surface topography science team meeting, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  58. Pavlis E, Beard R (1996) The laser retroreflector experiment on GPS-35 and 36. In: Beutler G, Hein G, Melbourne W, Seeber G (eds) GPS trends in precise terrestrial, airborne and spaceborne applications, International association of geodesy symposia, vol 115, Springer, New York, pp 154–158Google Scholar
  59. Pavlis D, Poulose S, Deng C, McCarthy J (2007) GEODYN II system documentation. SGT-Inc., Greenbelt, contractor report ednGoogle Scholar
  60. Pearlman MR, Degnan JJ, Bosworth JM (2002) The international laser ranging service. Adv Space Res 30(2):135–143. doi:10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00277-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Perosanz F, Martyand JC, Balmino G (1997) Dynamic orbit determination and gravity field model improvement from GPS, DORIS and laser measurements on TOPEX/POSEIDON satellite. J Geod 71(3):160–170. doi:10.1007/s001900050084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Petit G, Luzum B (2010) IERS conventions (2010). IERS technical note 36, Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie (BKG)Google Scholar
  63. Picone JM, Hedin AE, Drob DP, Aikin AC (2002) NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: statistical comparisons and scientific issues. J Geophys Res 107(A12):1–16. doi:10.1029/2002JA009430
  64. Priestley KJ, Smith GL, Thomas S, Cooper D, Lee RB, Walikainen D, Hess P, Szewczyk ZP, Wilson R (2011) Radiometric performance of the CERES earth radiation budget climate record sensors on the EOS Aqua and Terra spacecraft through April 2007. J Atmos Ocean Technol 28(1):3–21. doi:10.1175/2010JTECHA1521.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ray R (1999) A global ocean tide model from TOPEX/Poseidon altimeter: GOT99. Tm-209478, NASA technical memorandumGoogle Scholar
  66. Reigber C, Lhr H, Schwintzer P (2002) CHAMP mission status. Adv Space Res 30(2):129–134. doi:10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00276-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rodriguez-Solano CJ, Hugentobler U, Steigenberger P, Lutz S (2011) Impact of earth radiation pressure on GPS position estimates. J Geod 4(5):517–526. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0517-4 Google Scholar
  68. Rodriguez-Solano C, Hugentobler U, Steigenberger P (2012) Adjustable box-wing model for solar radiation pressure impacting GPS satellites. Adv Space Res 49(7):1113–1128. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2012.01.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Roy A (1969) Luni-solar perturbations of an earth satellite. Astrophys Space Sci 4(4):375–386. doi:10.1007/BF00651343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Savcenko R, Bosch W, Dettmering D, Seitz F (2012) EOT11a—global empirical ocean tide model from multi-mission satellite altimetry, with links to modern results. Tech. rep. 89, Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut (DGFI). doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.834232
  71. Schmid R, Dach R, Collilieux X, Jäggi A, Schmitz M, Dilssner F (2016) Absolute IGS antenna phase center model igs08.atx: status and potential improvements. J Geod 90(4):343–364. doi:10.1007/s00190-015-0876-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schutz BE, Tapley BD (1980) Orbit determination and model improvement for Seasat and Lageos. In: Astrodynamics conference, guidance, navigation, and control and co-located conferences. doi:10.2514/6.1980-1679
  73. Shampine LF, Gordon MK (1975) Computer solution of ordinary differential equations: the initial value problem. W. H. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  74. Springer T (2009) NAPEOS mathematical models and algorithms. Tech. rep. DOPS-SYS-TN-0100-OPS-GN, European Space Agency (ESA)Google Scholar
  75. Štěpánek P, Rodriguez-Solano CJ, Hugentobler U, Fillera V (2014) Impact of orbit modeling on DORIS station position and earth rotation estimates. Adv Space Res 53(7):1058–1070. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2014.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Švehla D, Rothacher M (2002) Kinematic orbit determination of LEOs based on zero or double-difference algorithms using simulated and real SST GPS data. In: Ádám J, Schwarz KP (eds) Vistas for geodesy in the New Millennium, international association of geodesy symposia, vol 125, Springer, pp 322–328. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-04709-5_53
  77. Švehla D, Rothacher M (2005) Kinematic precise orbit determination for gravity field determination. In: A window on the future of geodesy, international association of geodesy symposia, vol 128, Springer, Berlin, pp 181–188. doi:10.1007/3-540-27432-4_32
  78. Tapley BD, Chambers DP, Bettadpur S, Ries JC (2003) Large scale ocean circulation from the GRACE GGM01 geoid. Geophys Res Lett 30(22):1–4. doi:10.1029/2003GL01862 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tapley B, Schutz B, Born GH (2004a) Statistical orbit determination. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  80. Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber C (2004b) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys Res Lett 31:1–4. doi:10.1029/2004GL019920 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Urschl C, Gurtner W, Hugentobler U, Schaer S, Beutler G (2005) Validation of GNSS orbits using SLR observations. Adv Space Res 36(3):412–417. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vallado DA, Finkleman D (2008) A critical assessment of satellite drag and atmospheric density modeling. In: AIAA/AAS astrodynamics conferenceGoogle Scholar
  83. van den IJssel J, Encarnação J, Doornbos E, Visser P (2015) Precise science orbits for the Swarm satellite constellation. Adv Space Res 56(6):1024–1055. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2015.06.002 Google Scholar
  84. Vetter JR (2007) Fifty years of orbit determination: development of modern astrodynamics methods. John Hopkins APL Tech Digest 27(3):239–252Google Scholar
  85. Wielicki B, Barkstrom B, Harrison E, Lee R, Smith L, Cooper J (1996) Clouds and the earth’s radiant energy system (CERES): an earth observing system experiment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77(5):853–868. doi:10.1175/1520-0477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wu SC, Yunck TP, Thornton CL (1991) Reduced-dynamic technique for precise orbit determination of low earth satellites. J Guid Control Dyn 14(1):24–30. doi:10.2514/3.20600 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wu J, Wu S, Hajj G, Bertiger W, Lichten S (1993) Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase. Manuscr Geod 18:91–98Google Scholar
  88. Yoon YT, Eineder M, Yague-Martinez N, Montenbruck O (2009) TerraSAR-X precise trajectory estimation and quality assessment. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 47(6):1859–1868. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2008.2006983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Yunck T, Wu SC, Wu JT, Thornton C (1990) Precise tracking of remote sensing satellites with the global positioning system. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 28(1):108–116. doi:10.1109/36.45753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhaborovskyi VP (2014) Quantitative analysis of the atmospheric density models applicable for determination of artificial satellite deceleration. Kinemat Phys Celest Bodies 30(6):308–312. doi:10.3103/S0884591314060087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ziebart M, Adhya S, Sibthorpe A, Edwards S, Cross P (2005) Combined radiation pressure and thermal modelling of complex satellites: algorithms and on-orbit tests. Adv Space Res 36(3):424–430. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zumberge J, Heflin M, Jefferson D, Watkins M, Webb F (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102(B3):5005–5017. doi:10.1029/96JB03860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.German Space Operations Center, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR)WeßlingGermany
  2. 2.Remote Sensing Technology InstituteDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR)WeßlingGermany
  3. 3.Lehrstuhl für Astronomische und Physikalische GeodäsieTechnische Universität MünchenMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations