Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 90, Issue 9, pp 837–851 | Cite as

PPP-RTK and inter-system biases: the ISB look-up table as a means to support multi-system PPP-RTK

Original Article

Abstract

PPP-RTK has the potential of benefiting enormously from the integration of multiple GNSS/RNSS systems. However, since unaccounted inter-system biases (ISBs) have a direct impact on the integer ambiguity resolution performance, the PPP-RTK network and user models need to be flexible enough to accommodate the occurrence of system-specific receiver biases. In this contribution we present such undifferenced, multi-system PPP-RTK full-rank models for both network and users. By an application of \(\mathcal {S}\)-system theory, the multi-system estimable parameters are presented, thereby identifying how each of the three PPP-RTK components are affected by the presence of the system-specific biases. As a result different scenarios are described of how these biases can be taken into account. To have users benefit the most, we propose the construction of an ISB look-up table. It allows users to search the table for a network receiver of their own type and select the corresponding ISBs, thus effectively realizing their own ISB-corrected user model. By applying such corrections, the user model is strengthened and the number of integer-estimable user ambiguities is maximized.

Keywords

Multi-GNSS PPP-RTK Inter-system bias (ISB) Differential ISB (DISB) ISB look-up table 

References

  1. Baarda W (1973) S-transformations and criterion matrices. Tech. rep., vol 5(1). Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Publ. on Geodesy, New Series, DelftGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertiger W, Desai SD, Haines B, Harvey N, Moore AW, Owen S, Weiss JP (2010) Single receiver phase ambiguity resolution with GPS data. J Geod 84(5):327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bisnath S, Gao Y (2008) Current state of precise point positioning and future prospects and limitations. Observing our changing earth. IAG Symp 133:615–623Google Scholar
  4. Chu FY, Yang M (2014) GPS/Galileo long baseline computation: method and performance analyses. GPS Solut 18(2):263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins P (2008) Isolating and estimating undifferenced GPS integer ambiguities. In: Proc ION NTM, pp 720–732Google Scholar
  6. Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geod 82(7):389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geng J, Shi C, Ge M, Dodson AH, Lou Y, Zhao Q, Liu J (2012) Improving the estimation of fractional-cycle biases for ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning. J Geod 86(8):579–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. He H, Li J, Yang Y, Xu J, Guo H, Wang A (2014) Performance assessment of single-and dual-frequency BeiDou/GPS single-epoch kinematic positioning. GPS Solut 18(3):393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hegarty C, Powers E, Fonville B (2004) Accounting for timing biases between GPS, modernized GPS, and Galileo signals. In: Proceedings of 36th annual precise time and time interval (PTTI) meeting, Washington, DC, 79 Dec, pp 307–317Google Scholar
  10. Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Wasle E (2008) GNSS: global navigation satellite systems: GPS, Glonass, Galileo, and more. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Khodabandeh A, Teunissen PJG (2015) An analytical study of PPP-RTK corrections: precision, correlation and user-impact. J Geod 89(11):1109–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kouba J, Heroux P (2001) Precise point positioning using IGS orbit and clock products. GPS Solut 5(2):12–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Laurichesse D, Mercier F (2007) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP. In: Proceedings of the 20th international technical meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2007), pp 839–848Google Scholar
  14. Li X, Ge M, Dai X, Ren X, Fritsche M, Wickert J, Schuh H (2015) Accuracy and reliability of multi-GNSS real-time precise positioning: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo. J Geod 89(6):607–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Melgard T, Tegedor J, de Jong K, Lapucha D, Lachapelle G (2013) Interchangeable integration of GPS and Galileo by using a common system clock in PPP. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS+ 2013, Institute of Navigation, Nashville, TNGoogle Scholar
  16. Mervart L, Lukes Z, Rocken C, Iwabuchi T (2008) Precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution in real-time. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS, pp 397–405Google Scholar
  17. Montenbruck O, Hauschild A, Hessels U (2011) Characterization of GPS/GIOVE sensor stations in the CONGO network. GPS Solut 15(3):193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Montenbruck O, Hauschild A, Häberling S, Braun B, Katsigianni G, Hugentobler U (2015) High-rate clock variations of the Galileo IOV-1/2 satellites and their impact on carrier tracking by geodetic receivers. GPS Solut 1–10. doi:10.1007/s10291-015-0503-z
  19. Nadarajah N, Teunissen PJG, Sleewaegen JM, Montenbruck O (2014) The mixed-receiver Beidou inter-satellite-type bias and its impact on RTK positioning. GPS Solut 19(3):357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nadarajah N, Khodabandeh A, Teunissen PJG (2015) Assessing the IRNSS L5-signal in combination with GPS, Galileo, and QZSS L5/E5a-signals for positioning and navigation. GPS Solut 1–9Google Scholar
  21. Odijk D, Teunissen PJG (2013a) Characterization of between-receiver GPS-Galileo inter-system biases and their effect on mixed ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut 17(4):521–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Odijk D, Teunissen PJG (2013b) Estimation of differential inter-system biases between the overlapping frequencies of GPS, Galileo, BeiDou and QZSS. In: Proceedings of the 4th international colloquium scientific and fundamental aspects of the Galileo programme, Prague, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  23. Odijk D, Zhang B, Khodabandeh A, Odolinski R, Teunissen PJG (2015) On the estimability of parameters in undifferenced, uncombined GNSS network and PPP-RTK user models by means of S-system theory. J Geod 90(1):15–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Odolinski R, Teunissen PJG, Odijk D (2015) Combined BDS, Galileo, QZSS and GPS single-frequency RTK. GPS Solut 19(1):151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paziewski J, Wielgosz P (2014) Assessment of GPS+Galileo and multi-frequency Galileo single-epoch precise positioning with network corrections. GPS Solut 18(4):571–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paziewski J, Wielgosz P (2015) Accounting for Galileo-GPS inter-system biases in precise satellite positioning. J Geod 89(1):81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paziewski J, Sieradzki R, Wielgosz P (2015) Selected properties of GPS and Galileo-IOV receiver intersystem biases in multi-GNSS data processing. Meas Sci Technol 26(9):095,008Google Scholar
  28. Sleewagen J, Simsky A, Wilde W, Boon F, Willems T (2012) Demystifying GLONASS inter-frequency carrier phase biases. Inside GNSS, pp 57–61Google Scholar
  29. Teunissen PJG (1985) Generalized inverses, adjustment, the datum problem and S-transformations. In: Grafarend EW, Sanso F (eds) Optimization and design of geodetic networks. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  30. Teunissen PJG, Khodabandeh A (2015) Review and principles of PPP-RTK methods. J Geod 89(3):217–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Teunissen PJG, Kleusberg A (1998) GPS for geodesy, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Teunissen PJG, Odijk D, Zhang B (2010) PPP-RTK: results of CORS network-based PPP with integer ambiguity resolution. J Aeronaut Astronaut Aviat 42(4):223–229Google Scholar
  33. Teunissen PJG, Odolinski R, Odijk D (2014) Instantaneous BeiDou+ GPS RTK positioning with high cut-off elevation angles. J Geod 88(4):335–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Torre AD, Caporali A (2015) An analysis of intersystem biases for multi-GNSS positioning. GPS Solut 19(2):297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wubbena G, Schmitz M, Bagg A (2005) PPP-RTK: precise point positioning using state-space representation in RTK networks. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS, pp 13–16Google Scholar
  36. Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102:5005–5017CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GNSS Research CentreCurtin University of TechnologyPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Geoscience and Remote SensingDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations