Advertisement

Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 89, Issue 9, pp 873–886 | Cite as

Simulating the effects of quasar structure on parameters from geodetic VLBI

  • Stanislav S. Shabala
  • Jamie N. McCallum
  • Lucia Plank
  • Johannes Böhm
Original Article

Abstract

We investigate the effects of quasar structure on geodetic very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) measurements. We create catalogues of simulated and real quasars with a range of structure indices, and use these to generate synthetic CONT11 observations with the Vienna VLBI Software simulator tool. We systematically investigate the effects of quasars with different amounts of source structure, and find that source structure can affect station positions at the one-millimetre level. This effect is stronger for isolated stations. Overall, source structure is found to contribute to about 10 % of the troposphere and clock effects. Our simulations confirm analytical predictions that source structure mitigation strategies must be developed in order to achieve millimetre-level VLBI position accuracy.

Keywords

Geodesy Very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) Astrometry Celestial reference frame (CRF) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous referees for their useful and constructive comments. S. S., J. M. and L. P. thank the Australian Research Council for Research Fellowships. We are grateful to Jim Lovell, Simon Ellingsen, John Dickey and Rob Schaap for useful discussions.

References

  1. Böhm J, Böhm S, Nilsson T, Pany A, Plank L, Spicakova H, Teke K, Schuh H (2012) The New Vienna VLBI Software. In: Kenyon S, Pacino MC, Marti URS (eds) Proceedings of the 2009 IAG Symposium, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 136. 31 Aug–4 Sep 2009, pp 1007–1012 (ISBN 978-3-642-20337-4)Google Scholar
  2. Charlot P (1990) Radio-source structure in astrometric and geodetic very long baseline interferometry. Astron J 99:1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fey AL, Charlot P (1997) VLBA observations of radio reference frame sources. II. Astrometric suitability based on observed structure. Astrophys J Suppl Ser 111:95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fey AL, Charlot P (2000) VLBA observations of radio reference frame sources. III. Astrometric suitability of an additional 225 sources. Astrophys J Suppl Ser 128:17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lister ML, Cohen MH, Homan DC, Kadler M, Kellermann KI, Kovalev YY, Ros E, Savolainen T, Zensus A (2009) MOJAVE: monitoring of jets in active galactic nuclei with VLBA experiments. VI. Kinematics analysis of a complete sample of blazer jets. Astron J 137:3718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ma C et al (2009) IERS technical note. No. 35. http://www.iers.org/IERS/EN/Publications/TechnicalNotes/tn35.html. Accessed 1 May 2015
  7. Moór A, Frey S, Lambert SB, Titov OA, Bakos J (2011) On the connection of the apparent proper motion and the VLBI structure of compact radio sources. Astron J 141:178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nilsson T, Haas R, Elgered G (2007) Simulations of atmospheric path delays using turbulence models. In: Böhm J, Pany A, Schuh H (eds) Proceedings of the 18th European VLBI for Geodesy and Astrometry Working Meeting, 1213 April 2007, Geowissenschaftliche Mitteilungen, Heft Nr. 79, Schriftenreihe der Studienrichtung Vermessung und Geoinformation, Technische Universität Wien, pp 175-180 (ISSN 18118380)Google Scholar
  9. Nilsson T, Haas R (2010) Impact of atmospheric turbulence on geodetic very long baseline interferometry. J Geophys Res 115:B03407. doi: 10.1029/2009JB006579
  10. Ojha R, Fey AL, Jauncey DL, Lovell JEJ, Johnston KJ (2004) Milliarcsecond structure of microarcsecond sources: comparison of scintillating and non-scintillating extragalactic radio sources. Astrophys J 614:607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pany A, Böhm J, MacMillan D, Schuh H, Nilsson T, Wresnik J (2011) Monte Carlo simulations of the impact of troposphere, clock and measurement errors on the repeatability of VLBI positions. J Geodesy 85(1):39–50. doi: 10.1007/s00190-010-0415-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Petrachenko B, Niell A, Behrend D, Corey B, Böhm J, Charlot P, Collioud A, Gipson J, Haas R, Hobiger T, Koyama Y, MacMillan D, Malkin Z, Nilsson T, Pany A, Tuccari G, Whitney A, Wresnik J (2009) Design aspects of the VLBI2010 system: progress report of the IVS VLBI2010 Committee, NASA/TM-2009-214180Google Scholar
  13. Petrov L (2007) Proceedings of the 18th European, VLBI for geodesy and astrometry working meeting. In: Böhm J, Pany A, Schuh H (eds) pp 141–146Google Scholar
  14. Plag H-P, Pearlman M (eds) (2009) Global geodetic observing system-meeting the requirements of a global society on a changing planet in 2020. Springer Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Schaap RG, Shabala SS, Ellingsen SP, Titov OA, Lovell JEJ (2013) Scintillation is an indicator of astrometric stability. Monthly Notices Roy Astron Soc 434:585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schuh H, Behrend D (2012) VLBI: a fascinating technique for geodesy and astrometry. J Geodyn 61:68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shabala SS, Rogers JG, McCallum JN, Titov O, Blanchard J, Lovell JEJ, Watson CS (2014) The effects of frequency-dependent quasar evolution on the celestial reference frame. J Geodesy 88:575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sun J, Böhm J, Nilsson T, Krásná H, Böhm S, Schuh H (2014) New VLBI2010 scheduling strategies and implications on the terrestrial reference frames. J Geodesy 88:449CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanislav S. Shabala
    • 1
  • Jamie N. McCallum
    • 1
  • Lucia Plank
    • 1
  • Johannes Böhm
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Physical SciencesUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Geodesy and GeoinformationVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations