Advertisement

Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 89, Issue 5, pp 427–445 | Cite as

Timing group delay and differential code bias corrections for BeiDou positioning

  • Fei Guo
  • Xiaohong Zhang
  • Jinling Wang
Original Article

Abstract

This article first clearly figures out the relationship between parameters of timing group delay (TGD) and differential code bias (DCB) for BDS, and demonstrates the equivalence of TGD and DCB correction models combining theory with practice. The TGD/DCB correction models have been extended to various occasions for BDS positioning, and such models have been evaluated by real triple-frequency datasets. To test the effectiveness of broadcast TGDs in the navigation message and DCBs provided by the Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX), both standard point positioning (SPP) and precise point positioning (PPP) tests are carried out for BDS signals with different schemes. Furthermore, the influence of differential code biases on BDS positioning estimates such as coordinates, receiver clock biases, tropospheric delays and carrier phase ambiguities is investigated comprehensively. Comparative analysis show that the unmodeled differential code biases degrade the performance of BDS SPP by a factor of two or more, whereas the estimates of PPP are subject to varying degrees of influences. For SPP, the accuracy of dual-frequency combinations is slightly worse than that of single-frequency, and they are much more sensitive to the differential code biases, particularly for the B2B3 combination. For PPP, the uncorrected differential code biases are mostly absorbed into the receiver clock bias and carrier phase ambiguities and thus resulting in a much longer convergence time. Even though the influence of the differential code biases could be mitigated over time and comparable positioning accuracy could be achieved after convergence, it is suggested to properly handle with the differential code biases since it is vital for PPP convergence and integer ambiguity resolution.

Keywords

BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) Timing group delay (TGD) Differential code bias (DCB) Correction model Precise point positioning (PPP) Standard point positioning (SPP) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge IGS Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) for providing GNSS data and products. We also appreciate the editor-in-chief, Roland Klees, the handling editor, Pascal Willis, and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and improvements to this manuscript. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 41474025, No: 41404006) and International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program 2013 by the Office of China Postdoctoral Council (No. 2013042).

References

  1. Abdel-salam M (2005) Precise point positioning using un-differenced code and carrier phase observations. Dissertation, University of Calgary, Canada. UCGE reports no. 20229Google Scholar
  2. CSNO (2012) BeiDou navigation satellite system signal in space interface control document-open service signal B1I, version 1.0. China Satellite Navigation Office, Dec 2012Google Scholar
  3. CSNO (2013) BeiDou navigation satellite system signal in space interface control document-open service signal, version 2.0. China Satellite Navigation Office, Dec 2013Google Scholar
  4. Dach R, Montenbruck O, Prange L (2014) Status of the IGS-MGEX project. In: Proceedings of EUREF 2014 symposium, Vilnius, Lithuania, 3–7 JuneGoogle Scholar
  5. Deng Z, Zhao Q, Springer T, Prange L, Uhlemann M (2014) Orbit and clock determination-BeiDou. In: Proceedings of IGS workshop, Pasadena, USA, 23–27 JuneGoogle Scholar
  6. Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The International GNSS Service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geod 83(7):191–198. doi: 10.1007/s00190-008-0300-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feltens J, Schaer S (1998) IGS products for the ionosphere, IGS positioning paper. In: Proceedings of the IGS analysis centers workshop, Darmstadt, Germany, 9–11 FebGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao Y (2008) GNSS biases, their effect and calibration. In: Proceedings of IGS workshop, Miami Beach, USA, 2–6 JuneGoogle Scholar
  9. He L, Ge M, Wang J, Wickert J, Schuh H (2013) Experimental study on the precise orbit determination of the BeiDou navigation satellite system. Sensors 13(3):2911–2928. doi: 10.3390/s130302911 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hernández-Pajares M, Juan J, Sanz J, Orus R, Garcia-Rigo A, Feltens J, Komjathy A, Schaer S, Krankowski A (2009) The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998. J Geod 83(3):263–275. doi: 10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kouba J, Hérous P (2001) Precise point positioning using IGS orbit and clock products. GPS Solut 5(2):12–28. doi: 10.1007/PL00012883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li M, Qu L, Zhao Q, Guo J, Su X, Li X (2014) Precise point positioning with the BeiDou navigation satellite system. Sensors 14(1):927–943. doi: 10.3390/s140100927 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li Z, Yuan Y, Li H, Ou J, Huo X (2012) Two-step method for the determination of the differential code biases of COMPASS satellites. J Geod 86(11):1059–1076. doi: 10.1007/s00190-012-0565-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu J, Bi S, Zheng J, Xie J (2014) Effect of separation of navigation satellite antenna inter-frequency phase centers on TGD parameter. In: China satellite navigation conference (CSNC) 2014 Proceedings. Lecture notes in electrical engineering, vols II, 304, pp 227–238. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-54743-0_20
  15. Lou Y, Liu Y, Shi C, Yao X, Zheng F (2014) Precise orbit determination of BeiDou constellation based on BETS and MGEX network. Sci Rep 4:4692. doi: 10.1038/srep04692 Google Scholar
  16. Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P (2013) The BeiDou navigation message. J Glob Position Syst 12(1):1–12. doi: 10.5081/jgps.12.1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Montenbruck O, Hauschild A, Steigenberger P, Hugentobler U, Teunissen P, Nakamura S (2013) Initial assessment of the COMPASS/BeiDou-2 regional navigation satellite system. GPS Solut 17(2):211–222. doi: 10.1007/s10291-012-0272-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Hauschild A (2014) Differential code bias estimation using multi-gnss observations and global ionosphere maps. In: Proceedings of ION ITM 2014, San Diego, USA, 26–28 JanGoogle Scholar
  19. Petit G, Luzum B (2010) IERS Conventions 2010 (IERS Technical Note No. 36). Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, p 179. ISBN:3-89888-989-6.Google Scholar
  20. Rao GS (2007) GPS satellite and receiver instrumental biases estimation using least squares method for accurate ionosphere modeling. J Earth Syst Sci 116:407–411. doi: 10.1007/s12040-007-0039-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ray J (2001) Updated P1–C1 biases and cc2noncc. IGS Mail No. 3220, 5 MarchGoogle Scholar
  22. Rizos C, Montenbruck O, Weber R, Neilan R, Hugentobler U (2013) The IGS MGEX Experiment as a milestone for a comprehensive multi-GNSS service. In: Proceedings of ION-PNT-2013, Honolulu, USA, 22–25 AprilGoogle Scholar
  23. Schaer S (2003) IGS GLONASS tracking data. IGS Mail No. 4371, 8 May.Google Scholar
  24. Schaer S (2008) Differential code biases (DCB) in GNSS analysis. In: Proceedings of IGS workshop, Miami Beach, USA, 2–6 JuneGoogle Scholar
  25. Schaer S (2012) Overview of relevant GNSS biases. In: Proceedings of IGS workshop on GNSS biases. University of Bern, Switzerland, 18–19 JanGoogle Scholar
  26. Schaer S, Steigenberger P (2006) Determination and use of GPS differential code biases values. In: Proceedings of IGS workshop, Darmstadt, Germany, 8–11 MayGoogle Scholar
  27. Shi C, Zhao Q, Hu Z, Liu J (2013) Precise relative positioning using real tracking data from COMPASS GEO and IGSO satellites. GPS Solut 17(1):103–119. doi: 10.1007/s10291-012-0264-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tetewsky A, Ross J, Soltz A, Vaughn N, Anzperger J, O’Brien C, Graham D, Craig D and Lozow J (2009) Making sense of inter-signal corrections-accounting for GPS satellite calibration parameters in legacy and modernized ionosphere correction algorithms. InsideGNSS:37–48, July/AugustGoogle Scholar
  29. Wu JT, Wu SC, Hajj GA, Bertiger WI, Lichten SM (1993) Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phases. Man Geod 18:91–98Google Scholar
  30. Wu X, Hu X, Wang G, Zhong H, Tang C (2013) Evaluation of COMPASS ionospheric model in GNSS positioning. Adv Space Res 51(6):959–968. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.09.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang YX, Li JL, Wang AB, Xu JY, He HB, Guo HR, Shen JF, Dai X (2014) Preliminary assessment of the navigation and positioning performance of BeiDou regional navigation satellite system. Sci China Earth Sci 57(1):144–152. doi: 10.1007/s11430-013-4769-0
  32. Zhang X, Liu J, Forsberg R (2006) Application of precise point positioning in airborne survey. Geomat Inform Sci Wuhan Univ 31(1):19–22 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. Zhao Q, Guo J, Li M, Qu L, Hu Z, Shi C, Liu J (2013) Initial results of precise orbit and clock determination for COMPASS navigation satellite system. J Geod 87(5):475–486. doi: 10.1007/s00190-013-0622-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Geodesy and GeomaticsWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.School of Civil and Environment EngineeringUniversity of New SouthwalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations