# On partial errors-in-variables models with inequality constraints of parameters and variables

- 386 Downloads
- 8 Citations

## Abstract

Recent studies have extensively discussed total least squares (TLS) algorithms for solving the errors-in-variables (EIV) model with equality constraints but rarely investigated the inequality-constrained EIV model. The most existing inequality-constrained TLS algorithms assume that all the elements in the coefficient matrix are random and independent and that their numerical efficiency is significantly limited due to combinatorial difficulty. To solve the above issues, we formulate a partial EIV model with inequality constraints of both unknown parameters and the random elements of the coefficient matrix. Based on the formulated EIV model, the inequality-constrained TLS problem is transformed into a linear complementarity problem through linearization. In this way, the inequality-constrained TLS method remains applicable even when the elements of the coefficient matrix are subject to inequality constraints. Furthermore, the precision of the constrained estimates is put forward from a frequentist point of view. Three numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the efficiency and superiority of the proposed algorithm. The application is accomplished by preserving the structure of random coefficient matrix and satisfying the constraints simultaneously, without any combinatorial difficulty.

### Keywords

Total least squares Partial errors-in-variables model Inequality constraints Linear complementarity problem Precision description### References

- Adcock RJ (1877) Note on the method of least squares. Analyst 4:183–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Amiri-Simkooei AR (2013) Application of least squares variance component estimation to errors-in-variables models. J Geod 87:935–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Choi YJ, Kim JY, Sumg KM (1997) A robust algorithm of total least squares method. IEICE Trans Fundam E80-A(7):1336–1339Google Scholar
- De Moor B (1990) Total linear least squares with inequality constraints. In: Proceedings of ESAT-SISTA report 1990-2, Department of Electrical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- Deming WE (1931) The application of least squares. Phil Mag 11:146–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Deming WE (1934) On the application of least squares–II. Phil Mag 17:804–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fang X (2011) Weighted total least squares solutions for applications in geodesy. PhD dissertation, Department of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Leibniz University Hannover, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- Fang X (2013) Weighted total least squares: necessary and sufficient conditions, fixed and random parameters. J Geod 87:733–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fang X (2014a) On non-combinatorial weighted total least squares with inequality constraints. J Geod 88:805–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fang X (2014b) A structured and constrained total least-squares solution with cross-covariances. Stud Geophys Geod 58:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Felus Y, Schaffrin B (2005) Performing similarity transformations using the error-in-variables model. In: Proceedings of the ASPRS meeting, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Gerhold GA (1969) Least-squares adjustment of weighted data to a general linear equation. Am J Phys 37:156–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Golub GH, van Loan CF (1980) An analysis of the total least squares problem. SIAM J Numer Anal 17:883–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Koch KR (1999) Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kojima M, Megiddo N, Noma T, Yoshise A (1991) A unified approach to interior point algorithms for linear complementarity problems. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liew CK (1976) Inequality constrained least-squares estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 71:746–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mahboub V (2012) On weighted total least-squares for geodetic transformation. J Geod 86:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mahboub V, Sharifi MA (2013) On weighted total least squares with linear and quadratic constraints. J Geod 87:607–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mahboub V (2014) Variance component estimation in errors-in-variables models and a rigorous total least-squares approach. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 58:17–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Markovsky I, van Huffel S (2006) On weighted structured total least squares. Large Scale Sci Comput Lect Notes Comput Sci 3743:695–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neitzel F (2010) Generalization of total least-squares on example of unweighted and weighted 2D similarity transformation. J Geod 84:751–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pearson K (1901) On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos Mag 2:559–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peng JH, Guo CX, Zhang HP, Song SL (2006) An aggregate constraint method for inequality-constrained least squares problem. J Geod 79:705–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roese-Koerner L, Devaraju B, Sneeuw N, Schuh WD (2012) A stochastic framework for inequality constrained estimation. J Geod 86:1005–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roese-Koerner L, Schuh WD (2014) Convex optimization under inequality constraints in rank-deficient systems. J Geod 88:415–426Google Scholar
- Schaffrin B, Felus YA (2005) On total least-squares adjustment with constraints. IAG Symp 128:417–421Google Scholar
- Schaffrin B (2006) A note on constrained total least-squares estimation. Linear Algebra Appl 417:245–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schaffrin B, Felus YA (2008) On the multivariate total least-squares approach to empirical coordinate transformations, three algorithms. J Geod 82:373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schaffrin B, Wieser A (2008) On weighted total least-squares adjustment for linear regression. J Geod 82:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schaffrin B (2009) TLS-collocation: the total-least squares approach to EIV-models with stochastic prior information. In: Presented at the 18th international, workshop on matrices and statistics, Smolenice Castle, SolvakiaGoogle Scholar
- Shen YZ, Li BF, Chen Y (2011) An iterative solution of weighted total least-squares adjustment. J Geod 85:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Snow K (2012) Topics in total least-squares adjustment within the errors-in-variables model: singular cofactor matrices and prior information. PhD dissertation, School of Earth Science, The Ohio State University, USAGoogle Scholar
- Van Huffel S, Vandewalle J (1991) The total least squares problem: computational aspects and analysis. SIAM, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Waston GA (2007) Robust counterparts of errors-in-variables problems. Comput Stat Data Anal 52:1080–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xu PL (1998) Mixed integer geodetic observation and interger programming with applications to GPS ambiguity resolution. J Geod Soc Japan 44:169–187Google Scholar
- Xu PL, Cannon E, Lachapelle G (1999) Stabilizing ill-conditioned linear complementarity problems. J Geod 73:204–213Google Scholar
- Xu PL, Liu JN, Shi C (2012) Total least squares adjustment in partial errors-in-variables models: algorithm and statistical analysis. J Geod 86:661–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xu PL, Liu JN, Zeng WX, Shen YZ (2014) Effects of errors-in-variables on weighted least squares estimation. J Geod 88:705–716Google Scholar
- Xu PL, Liu JN (2014) Variance components in errors-in-variables models: estimability, stability and bias analysis. J Geod 88:719–734Google Scholar
- Zhang SL, Tong XH, Zhang K (2013) A solution to EIV model with inequality constraints and its geodetic applications. J Geod 87:89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhu JJ, Santerre R, Chang XW (2005) A Bayesian method for linear, inequality-constrained adjustment and its application to GPS positioning. J Geod 78:528–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar