Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 85, Issue 6, pp 329–340 | Cite as

EVA: GPS-based extended velocity and acceleration determination

  • Dagoberto Salazar
  • Manuel Hernandez-Pajares
  • Jose Miguel Juan-Zornoza
  • Jaume Sanz-Subirana
  • Angela Aragon-Angel
Original Article

Abstract

In this work, a new GPS carrier phase-based velocity and acceleration determination method is presented that extends the effective range of previous techniques. The method is named ‘EVA’, and may find applications in fields such as airborne gravimetry when rough terrain or water bodies make difficult or impractical to set up nearby GPS reference receivers. The EVA method is similar to methods such as Kennedy (Precise acceleration determination from carrier phase measurements. In: Proceedings of the 15th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the Institute of Navigation. ION GPS 2002, Portland pp 962–972, 2002b) since it uses L1 carrier phase observables for velocity and acceleration determination. However, it introduces a wide network of stations and it is independent of precise clock information because it estimates satellite clock drifts and drift rates ‘on-the-fly’, requiring only orbit data of sufficient quality. Moreover, with EVA the solution rate is only limited by data rate, and not by the available precise satellite clocks data rate. The results obtained are more robust for long baselines than the results obtained with the reference Kennedy method. An advantage of being independent of precise clock information is that, beside IGS Final products, also the Rapid, Ultra-Rapid (observed) and Ultra-Rapid (predicted) products may be used. Moreover, the EVA technique may also use the undifferenced ionosphere-free carrier phase combination (LC), overcoming baseline limitations in cases where ionosphere gradients may be an issue and very low biases are required. During the development of this work, some problems were found in the velocity estimation process of the Kennedy method. The sources of the problems were identified, and an improved version of the Kennedy method was used for this research work. An experiment was performed using a light aircraft flying over the Pyrenees, showing that both EVA and the improved Kennedy methods are able to cope with the dynamics of mountainous flight. A RTK-derived solution was also generated, and when comparing the three methods to a known zero-velocity reference the results yielded similar performance. The EVA and the improved-Kennedy methods outperformed the RTK solutions, and the EVA method provided the best results in this experiment. Finally, both the improved version of the Kennedy method and the EVA method were applied to a network in equatorial South America with baselines of more than 1,770 km, and during local noon. Under this tough scenario, the EVA method showed a clear advantage for all components of velocity and acceleration, yielding better and more robust results.

Keywords

Carrier Phase Velocity Acceleration GPSTk 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ARL (2010) The GPS Toolkit, GPSTk [Online; accessed November 20th, 2010]. http://www.gpstk.org/
  2. Bruton AM (2000) Improving the accuracy and resolution of SINS/DGPS airborne gravimetry. PhD thesis. Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Report No. 20145Google Scholar
  3. Bruton AM, Glennie CL, Schwarz KP (1999) Differentiation for high-precision GPS velocity and acceleration determination. GPS Solut 2(4): 7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cannon ME, Lachapelle G, Szarmes MC, Hebert JM, Keith J, Jokerst S (1997) DGPS kinematic carrier phase signal simulation analysis for precise velocity and position determination. J Inst Navig 44(2): 231–246Google Scholar
  5. Dahlquist G, Bjork A (1974) Numerical methods. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. ISBN 0-13-627315-7Google Scholar
  6. Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger KH, Wasle E (2008) GNSS—Global navigation satellite systems. Springer, WienGoogle Scholar
  7. Jekeli C (1994) On the computation of vehicle accelerations using GPS phase accelerations. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on kinematic systems in geodesy, geomatics and navigation (KIS94), Banff, Canada, pp 473–481Google Scholar
  8. Jekeli C, Garcia R (1997) GPS phase accelerations for moving-base vector gravimetry. J Geodesy 71(10): 630–639. doi: 10.1007/s001900050130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kennedy S (2002a) Acceleration estimation from GPS carrier phases for airborne gravimetry Master’s thesis. Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada report no. 20160Google Scholar
  10. Kennedy S (2002b) Precise acceleration determination from carrier phase measurements. In: Proceedings of the 15th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the Institute of Navigation. ION GPS 2002, Portland, pp 962–972Google Scholar
  11. Kouba J (2009) A guide to using International GNSS Service (IGS) products. Tech. rep., International GNSS Service, http://acc.igs.org/UsingIGSProductsVer21.pdf
  12. Misra P, Enge P (2006) Global positioning system. Signals, measurements and performance. Ganga-Jamuna Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Parkinson BW, Spilker Jr JJ (1996) Global positioning system: theory and applications, vol I & II. American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Radovanovic RS, El-Sheimy N, Teskey W (2001) Rigorous combination of GPS data from multiple base stations for mobile platform positioning. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on mobile mapping technology, Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  15. Salazar D, Hernandez-Pajares M, Juan J, Sanz J (2010) GNSS data management and processing with the GPSTk. GPS Solut 14(3): 293–299. doi: 10.1007/s10291-009-0149-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Szarmes M, Ryan S, Lachapelle G, Fenton P (1997) DGPS high accuracy aircraft velocity determination using Doppler measurements. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on kinematic systems (KIS97), Banff, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  17. Takasu T, Yasuda A (2009) Development of the low-cost RTK-GPS receiver with an open source program package rtklib. In: Proceedings of international symposium on GPS/GNSS, Jeju, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  18. van Graas F, Soloviev A (2004) Precise velocity estimation using a stand-alone GPS receiver. NAVIGATION. J Inst Navig 51(4): 283–292Google Scholar
  19. Walter T, Enge P, Hansen A (1997) A proposed integrity equation for WAAS MOPS. In: Proceedings of the 10th international technical meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 1997), Kansas City, USA, pp 475–484Google Scholar
  20. Zhang X, Forsberg R (2007) Assessment of long-range kinematic GPS positioning errors by comparison with airborne laser altimetry and satellite altimetry. J Geodesy 81(3): 210–211. doi: 10.1007/s00190-006-0100-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dagoberto Salazar
    • 1
  • Manuel Hernandez-Pajares
    • 1
  • Jose Miguel Juan-Zornoza
    • 1
  • Jaume Sanz-Subirana
    • 1
  • Angela Aragon-Angel
    • 1
  1. 1.gAGE/UPC Research group of Astronomy and GeomaticsBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations