Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 84, Issue 5, pp 327–337

Single receiver phase ambiguity resolution with GPS data

  • Willy Bertiger
  • Shailen D. Desai
  • Bruce Haines
  • Nate Harvey
  • Angelyn W. Moore
  • Susan Owen
  • Jan P. Weiss
Original Article

Abstract

Global positioning system (GPS) data processing algorithms typically improve positioning solution accuracy by fixing double-differenced phase bias ambiguities to integer values. These “double-difference ambiguity resolution” methods usually invoke linear combinations of GPS carrier phase bias estimates from pairs of transmitters and pairs of receivers, and traditionally require simultaneous measurements from at least two receivers. However, many GPS users point position a single local receiver, based on publicly available solutions for GPS orbits and clocks. These users cannot form double differences. We present an ambiguity resolution algorithm that improves solution accuracy for single receiver point-positioning users. The algorithm processes dual- frequency GPS data from a single receiver together with wide-lane and phase bias estimates from the global network of GPS receivers that were used to generate the orbit and clock solutions for the GPS satellites. We constrain (rather than fix) linear combinations of local phase biases to improve compatibility with global phase bias estimates. For this precise point positioning, no other receiver data are required. When tested, our algorithm significantly improved repeatability of daily estimates of ground receiver positions, most notably in the east component by approximately 30% with respect to the nominal case wherein the carrier biases are estimated as real values. In this “static” test for terrestrial receiver positions, we achieved daily repeatability of 1.9, 2.1 and 6.0 mm in the east, north and vertical (ENV) components, respectively. For kinematic solutions, ENV repeatability is 7.7, 8.4, and 11.7 mm, respectively, representing improvements of 22, 8, and 14% with respect to the nominal. Results from precise orbit determination of the twin GRACE satellites demonstrated that the inter-satellite baseline accuracy improved by a factor of three, from 6 to 2 mm up to a long-term bias. Jason-2/Ocean Surface Topography Mission precise orbit determination tests results implied radial orbit accuracy significantly below the 10 mm level. Stability of time transfer, in low-Earth orbit, improved from 40 to 7 ps. We produced these results by applying this algorithm within the Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s (JPL’s) GIPSY/OASIS software package and using JPL’s orbit and clock products for the GPS constellation. These products now include a record of the wide-lane and phase bias estimates from the underlying global network of GPS stations. This implies that all GIPSY–OASIS positioning users can now benefit from this capability to perform single-receiver ambiguity resolution.

Keywords

Ambiguity fixing GPS POD Precise point positioning WLPBLIST 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bar-Sever YE, Kroger PM, Borjesson JA (1998) Estimating horizontal gradients of tropospheric path delay with a single GPS receiver. J Geophys Res 103: 5019–5035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertiger W, Desai S, Dorsey A, Haines B, Harvey N, Kuang D, Sibthorpe A, Weiss J (2010) Sub-centimeter precision orbit determination with GPS for ocean altimetry. Mar Geod Spec Issue (submitted)Google Scholar
  3. Bertiger WI, Bar-Sever YE, Christensen EJ, Davis ES, Guinn JR, Haines BJ, Ibanez-Meier RW, Jee JR, Lichten SM, Melbourne WG, Muellerschoen RJ, Munson TN, Vigue Y, Wu SC, Yunck TP, Schutz BE, Abusali PAM, Rim HJ, Watkins MM, Willis P (1994) GPS precise tracking Of TOPEX/Poseidon: results and implications. JGR Oceans TOPEX/Poseidon Spec Issue 99C12: 24,449–24,464Google Scholar
  4. Blewitt G (1989) Carrier phase ambiguity resolution for the global positioning system applied to geodetic baselines up to 200 km. J Geophys Res 94B8: 10187–10203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boehm J, Werl B, Schuh H (2006) Troposphere mapping functions for GPS and very long baseline interferometry from European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts operational analysis data. J Geophys Res 111: B02406. doi:10.1029/2005JB003629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cerri L, Mercier F, Berthias JP, Ries JC, Lemoine FG, Zelensky NP, Bertiger W, Haines B, Willis P, Ziebart M (2010) Precision orbit determination standards for the Jason series of altimeter missions. Mar Geod Spec Issue (submitted)Google Scholar
  7. Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The International GNSS Service in a changing landscape of Global Navigation Satellite Systems. J Geod 83(7): 191–198. doi:10.1007/s00190-008-0300-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn C, Bertiger W, Bar-Sever Y, Bettadpur S, Desai S, Franklin G, Haines B, Kruizinga G, Kuang D, Meehan T, Nandi S, Nguyen D, Rogstad T, Romans L, Thomas BJ, Tien J, Watkins M, Wu S (2003) Instrument of grace, GPS augments gravity measurements. GPS World 14(2): 16–28Google Scholar
  9. Jäggi A, Dach R, Montenbruck O, Hugentobler U, Bock H, Beutler G (2009) Phase center modeling for LEO GPS receiver antennas and its impact on precise orbit determination. J Geod 83(12):1145-1162. doi:10.1007/s00190-009-0333-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jefferson D, Bar-Sever Y, Heflin M, Watkins M, Webb F, Zumberge J (1999) JPL IGS Analysis Center Report. IGS 1998 Technical Reports, pp 89–97Google Scholar
  11. Kroes R (2006) GRACE: precise relative positioning of formation flying spacecraft using GPS. Dissertation, Delft University, Publications on Geodesy 61 Delft, March 2006, ISBN 10:90-6132-296-0Google Scholar
  12. Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias JP, Broca P, Cerri L (2008) Zero-difference ambiguity fixing for spaceborne GPS receivers. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2008, the 21st international technical meeting of the satellite division of the Institute of Navigation, Savannah, Georgia, 16–19 September 2008, pp 758–768Google Scholar
  13. Liu Z, Owen S, Dong D, Lundgren P, Webb F, Hetland E, Simons M (2009) Re-examination of the interplate coupling in Nankai trough, Japan using GPS data in 1996–2006. Geophys J Int (in revision, November)Google Scholar
  14. McCarthy D, Petit G (2004) IERS Conventions (2003) IERS Technical Note No. 32, http://www.iers.org/iers/publications/tn/tn32, Verlag des Bundesamts fur Kartographie und Geodasie, Frankfurt am Main
  15. Melbourne WG (1985) The case for ranging in GPS base systems. In: Proceedings of the first symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, positioning with GPS-1985. U.S. Department of Commerce, Rockville, pp 373–386Google Scholar
  16. Neeck SP, Vaze PV (2008) The ocean surface topography mission (OSTM). Proc SPIE 7106Google Scholar
  17. Niell AE (2006) Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelengths. J Geophys Res 101: 3227–3246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Owen SE, Dong D, Webb FH, Newport BJ, Simons M (2006) Deformation of Japan as measured by improved analysis of GEONET data. Eos Trans. AGU, vol 87, issue 52, Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract G42A-07Google Scholar
  19. Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber C (2004) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys Res Lett 31(9): L09607. doi:10.1029/2004GL019920 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wubbena G (1985) Software developments for geodetic positions with GPS using TI-4100 code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of the first symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, positioning with GPS-1985. U.S. Department of Commerce, Rockville, pp 403–412Google Scholar
  21. Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102(B3): 5005–5017CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willy Bertiger
    • 1
  • Shailen D. Desai
    • 1
  • Bruce Haines
    • 1
  • Nate Harvey
    • 1
  • Angelyn W. Moore
    • 1
  • Susan Owen
    • 1
  • Jan P. Weiss
    • 1
  1. 1.Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations