Ocean loading effects on the prediction of Antarctic glacial isostatic uplift and gravity rates
- 166 Downloads
The effect of regional ocean loading on predicted rates of crustal uplift and gravitational change due to glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) is determined for Antarctica. The effect is found to be significant for the ICE-3G and ICE-5G loading histories (up to −8 mm/year and −3 mm/year change in uplift rate and −3 cm/year and −1 cm/year equivalent water height change (EWHC) of surface mass, respectively). The effect is smaller (+1 mm/year; +0.25 cm/year) for the IJ05 loading history. The impact of ocean loading on the rate of change of the long-wavelength zonal harmonics of the Earth’s gravitational field is also significantly smaller for IJ05 than ICE-3G. A simple analytical formula is derived that is accurate to about 3% in a root-mean-square sense that relates predicted or observed gravitational change at the surface of the Earth (r = a) to the EWHC. A fundamental difference in the definition of the load histories accounts for the differing sensitivities to ocean loading. IJ05 defines its surface load history relative to the present-day surface load, rather than specifying an absolute loading history, and thus implicitly approximates the temporal and spatial mass exchange between grounded ice and open ocean. In contrast, ICE-3G and ICE-5G specify an absolute load history and explicit regional ocean loading substantially perturbs predicted GIA rates. Conclusions of previous studies that used IJ05 predictions without ocean loading are relatively robust.
KeywordsGlacial isostatic adjustment Antarctica GRACE Gravity change Crustal movement GPS
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Amalvict M, Willis P, Wöppelmann G, Ivins ER, Bouin M-N, Testut L, Hinderer J (2009) Isostatic stability of the East Antarctic station Dumont d’Urville from long-term geodetic observations and geophysical models. Polar Res. doi:10.1111/j.1751-8369.2008.00091.x
- Chao BF, Gross RS (1987) Changes in the Earth’s rotation and low-degree gravitational field induced by earthquakes. Geophys J R Astr Soc 91: 569–596Google Scholar
- Farrell WE, Clark JA (1976) On postglacial sea level. Geophys J R Astr Soc 46: 647–667Google Scholar
- Gomez N, Mitrovica JX, Tamisiea ME, Clark PU (2009) A new projection of sea level change in response to collapse of marine sectors of the Antarctic ice sheet. Geophys J Int. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04419.x
- Lythe MB, Vaughan DG, the BEDMAP Consortium (2001) BEDMAP—a new ice thickness and subglacial topographic model of Antarctica. J Geophys Res 106:11335–11351Google Scholar
- Milne GA (1998) Refining models of the glacial isostatic adjustment process. Ph.D. thesis, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
- Ohzono M, Tabei T, Doi K, Shibuya K, Sagiya T (2006) Crustal movement of Antarctica and Syowa Station based on GPS measurements. Earth Planets Space 58: 795–804Google Scholar
- Okuno J, Nakada M (2001) Effects of water load on geophysical signals due to glacial rebound and implications for mantle viscosity. Earth Planets Space 53: 1121–1135Google Scholar
- Tregoning P, Welsh A, McQueen H, Lambeck K (2000) The search for postglacial rebound near the Lambert Glacier, Antarctica. Earth Planets Space 52: 1037–1041Google Scholar
- Willis MJ (2008) Crustal motion in the Antarctic interior from a decade of Global Positioning System measurements. Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar