Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 83, Issue 7, pp 635–644 | Cite as

An improved empirical model for the effect of long-period ocean tides on polar motion

Open Access
Original Article

Abstract

Because the tide-raising potential is symmetric about the Earth’s polar axis it can excite polar motion only by acting upon non-axisymmetric features of the Earth like the oceans. In fact, after removing atmospheric and non-tidal oceanic effects, polar motion excitation observations show a strong fortnightly tidal signal that is not completely explained by existing dynamical and empirical ocean tide models. So a new empirical model for the effect of the termensual (Mtm and mtm), fortnightly (Mf and mf), and monthly (Mm) tides on polar motion is derived here by fitting periodic terms at these tidal frequencies to polar motion excitation observations that span 2 January 1980 to 8 September 2006 and from which atmospheric and non-tidal oceanic effects have been removed. While this new empirical tide model can fully explain the observed fortnightly polar motion excitation signal during this time interval it would still be desirable to have a model for the effect of long-period ocean tides on polar motion that is determined from a dynamical ocean tide model and that is therefore independent of polar motion observations.

Keywords

Earth rotation Polar motion Ocean tides Oceanic angular momentum Atmospheric angular Momentum 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank S. Dickman for his thoughtful review that led to many improvements to this manuscript. The work described in this paper was performed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Support for this work was provided by the Earth Surface and Interior Focus Area of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate. The supercomputers used in this investigation were provided by funding from the JPL Office of the Chief Information Officer.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution,and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Brosche P (1982) Oceanic tides and the rotation of the Earth. In: Fricke WG, Teleki G (eds) Sun and planetary system, Reidel, pp 179–184Google Scholar
  2. Cartwright DE, Edden AC (1973) Corrected tables of tidal harmonics. Geophys J R Astr Soc 33: 253–264Google Scholar
  3. Chao BF (1994) Zonal tidal signals in the Earth’s polar motion. Eos Trans AGU 75(44): 158Google Scholar
  4. Chao BF, Ray RD (1997) Oceanic tidal angular momentum and Earth’s rotation variations. Prog Oceanogr 40: 399–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chao BF, Ray RD, Gipson JM, Egbert GD, Ma C (1996) Diurnal/ semidiurnal polar motion excited by oceanic tidal angular momentum. J Geophys Res 101(B9): 20151–20163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Desai SD, Wahr JM (1995) Empirical ocean tide models estimated from TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry. J Geophys Res 100(C12): 25205–25228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickman SR (1993) Dynamic ocean-tide effects on Earth’s rotation. Geophys J Int 112: 448–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eubanks TM (1993) Variations in the orientation of the Earth. In: Smith DE, Turcotte DL (eds) Contributions of space geodesy to geodynamics: earth dynamics. American Geophysical Union Geodynamics Series, vol 24. Washington, DC, pp 1–54Google Scholar
  9. Greatbatch RJ (1994) A note on the representation of steric sea level in models that conserve volume rather than mass. J Geophys Res 99: 12767–12771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gross RS (1993) The effect of ocean tides on the Earth’s rotation as predicted by the results of an ocean tide model. Geophys Res Lett 20(4): 293–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gross RS (2003) The GGFC Special Bureau for the Oceans: Past progress and future plans. In: Richter B, Schwegmann W, Dick WR (eds) Proceedings of the IERS workshop on combination research and global geophysical fluids. IERS technical note No 30. Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt, Germany, pp 131–138Google Scholar
  12. Gross RS (2007) Combinations of Earth orientation measurements: SPACE2006, COMB2006, and POLE2006. Jet Propulsion Laboratory Publ 07-5, Pasadena, CalifGoogle Scholar
  13. Gross RS, Hamdan KH, Boggs DH (1996) Evidence for excitation of polar motion by fortnightly ocean tides. Geophys Res Lett 23(14): 1809–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gross RS, Chao BF, Desai S (1997) Effect of long-period ocean tides on the Earth’s polar motion. Prog Oceanogr 40: 385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gross RS, Fukumori I, Menemenlis D (2003) Atmospheric and oceanic excitation of the Earth’s wobbles during 1980–2000. J Geophys Res 108(B8):2370. doi: 10.1029/2002JB002143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Jenne R, Joseph D (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Met Soc 77: 437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marshall J, Hill C, Perelman L, Adcroft A (1997a) Hydrostatic, quasi-hydrostatic, and nonhydrostatic ocean modeling. J Geophys Res 102: 5733–5752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marshall J, Adcroft A, Hill C, Perelman L, Heisey C (1997b) A finite-volume, incompressible, Navier Stokes model for studies of the ocean on parallel computers. J Geophys Res 102: 5753–5766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Salstein DA (2003) The GGFC Special Bureau for the Atmosphere of the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service. In: Richter B, Schwegmann W, Dick WR (eds) Proceedings of the IERS workshop on combination research and global geophysical fluids. IERS technical note No 30. Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt, Germany, pp 121–124Google Scholar
  20. Seiler U (1991) Periodic changes of the angular momentum budget due to the tides of the world ocean. J Geophys Res 96(B6): 10287–10300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Simon JL, Bretagnon P, Chapront J, Chapront-Touzé M, Francou G, Laskar J (1994) Numerical expressions for precession formulae and mean elements for the Moon and the planets. Astron Astrophys 282: 663–683Google Scholar
  22. Stammer D, Wunsch C, Fukumori I, Marshall J (2002) State estimation improves prospects for ocean research. Eos Trans AGU 83(27): 289–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weis P (2006) Ocean tides and the earth’s rotation—results of a high-resolving ocean model forced by the lunisolar potential. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität HamburgGoogle Scholar
  24. Wunsch C, Stammer D (1997) Atmospheric loading and the oceanic “inverted barometer” effect. Rev Geophys 35: 79–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhou YH, Salstein DA, Chen JL (2006) Revised atmospheric excitation function series related to Earth variable rotation under consideration of surface topography. J Geophys Res 111:D12108. doi: 10.1029/2005JD006608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations