Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 80, Issue 8–11, pp 625–635 | Cite as

DORIS Contribution to ITRF2005

Original Article

Abstract

We examine the contribution of the Doppler Orbit determination and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite (DORIS) technique to the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF2005) by evaluating the quality of the submitted solutions as well as that of the frame parameters, especially the origin and the scale. Unlike the previous versions of the ITRF, ITRF2005 is constructed with input data in the form of time-series of station positions (weekly for satellite techniques and daily for VLBI) and daily Earth orientation parameters (EOPs), including full variance–covariance information. Analysis of the DORIS station positions’ time-series indicates an internal precision reaching 15 mm or better, at a weekly sampling. A cumulative solution using 12 years of weekly time-series was obtained and compared to a similar International GNSS Service (IGS) GPS solution (at 37 co-located sites) yielding a weighted root mean scatter (WRMS) of the order of 8 mm in position (at the epoch of minimum variance) and about 2.5 mm/year in velocity. The quality of this cumulative solution resulting from the combination of two individual DORIS solutions is better than any individual solution. A quality assessment of polar motion embedded in the contributed DORIS solutions is performed by comparison with the results of other space-geodetic techniques and in particular GPS. The inferred WRMS of polar motion varies significantly from one DORIS solution to another and is between 0.5 and 2 mas, depending on the strategy used and in particular estimating or not polar motion rate by the analysis centers. This particular aspect certainly needs more investigation by the DORIS Analysis Centers.

Keywords

Reference frames Earth rotation DORIS International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altamimi Z, Boucher C, Sillard P (2002a) New trends for the realization of the international terrestrial reference system. Adv Space Res 30(2):175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altamimi Z, Sillard P, Boucher C (2002b) ITRF2000: a new release of the international terrestrial reference frame for Earth science applications. J Geophys Res 107(B10):2214. DOI 10.1029/2001JB000561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altamimi Z, Boucher C (2003) Multi-technique combination of time series of station positions and Earth orientation parameters. In: Richter B, Schwegmann W, Dick W (eds) Proceedings of the IERS workshop on combination research and global geophysical fluids. IERS Technical Note No. 30. Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, pp 102–106Google Scholar
  4. Altamimi Z, Sillard P, Boucher C (2004) ITRF2000: from theory to implementation. In: Sansó F (ed) V Hotine-Marussi symposium on mathematical geodesy, International Association of Geodesy, vol 127. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 157–163Google Scholar
  5. Altamimi Z, Boucher C, Gambis D (2005) Long-term stability of the terrestrial reference frame. Adv Space Res 36(3):342–329. DOI 10.1016/ j.asr.2005.03.068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Altamimi Z, Collilieux X, Boucher C (2006) Preliminary analysis in view of the ITRF2005. IAG Proceedings, Symposium the dynamic planet. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (in press)Google Scholar
  7. Biancale R, Balmino G, Lemoine J M (2000) A new global Earth’s gravity field model from satellite orbit perturbations, GRIM5-S1. Geophys Res Lett 27(22):3611–3614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blewitt G (2003) Self-consistency in reference frames, geocenter definition, and surface loading of the solid Earth. J Geophys Res 108(B2): 2103. DOI 10.1029/2002JB002082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blewitt G, Lavalé D (2002) Effect of annual signals on geodetic velocity. J Geophys Res 107(B7). DOI 10.1029/2001JB000570Google Scholar
  10. Boucher C, Altamimi Z, Feissel M, Sillard P (1996) Results and analysis of the ITRF94, IERS Technical Note 20, Observatoire de ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. Bouille F, Cazenave A, Lemoine JM, CrTtaux JF (2000) Geocentre motion from the DORIS space system and laser data to the Lageos satellites: comparison with surface loading data. Geophys J Int 143:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen JL, Wilson CR, Eanes RJ, Nerem RS (1999) Geophysical interpretation of observed geocenter variations. J Geophys Res 104(B2):2683–2690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crétaux JF, Soudarin L, Cazenave A, Bouille F (1998) Present-day tectonic plate motions and crustal deformations from the DORIS space system. J Geophys Res 103(B12):30167–30181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crétaux JF, Soudarin L, Davidson FJM, Gennero MC, Berge-Nguyen M, Cazenave A (2002) Seasonal and interannual geocenter motion from SLR and DORIS measurements: Comparison with surface loading data. J Geophys Res 107(B12):2374. DOI 10.1029/2002JB001820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dong D, Dickey JO, Chao Y, Cheng MK (1997) Geocenter variations caused by atmosphere, ocean and surface ground water. Geophys Res Lett 24(15):1867–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fagard H (2006) 20 years of evolution for the DORIS permanent network: from its initial deployment to its renovation. J Geod (in press)Google Scholar
  17. Kuzin SP, Sorokin NA, Tatevian SK (2003) Recent analysis of DORIS data at INASAN. In: Proceedings of IDS analysis workshop, 20–21 February 2003, Mare la Valée. http://lareg.ensg.ign.fr/IDS/events/ 2003_files/Kuzin_Feb03.pdfGoogle Scholar
  18. Lavallé DA, van Dam T, Blewitt G, Clarke PJ (2006) Geocenter motions from GPS: a unified observation model. J Geophys Res 111(B10). DOI 10.1029/2005JB003784Google Scholar
  19. Nouël F, Bardina J, Jayles C, Labrune Y, Troung B (1988) DORIS: a precise satellite positioning Doppler system. In: Solder JK et al. (eds) Astrodynamics 1987. Adv Astron Sci 65:311–320Google Scholar
  20. Sillard P, Boucher C (2001) A review of algebraic constraints in terrestrial reference frame datum definition. J Geod 75(2–3):63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Soudarin L, Crétaux JF, Cazenave A (1999) Vertical crustal motions from the DORIS space-geodesy system. Geophys Res Lett 26(9):1207–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber C (2004) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys Res Lett 31(9):L09607. DOI 10.1029/2004GL021908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tavernier G, Fagard H, Feissel-Vernier M, Lemoine F, Noll C, Ries JC, Soudarin L, Willis P (2005) The international DORIS service, IDS. Adv Space Res 36(3):333–34DOI 10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.102 Webb F, Zumberge J (eds) (1995) An introduction to GIPSY/OASIS-II, Report JPLM D-11088, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, PasadenaGoogle Scholar
  24. Williams SPD, Willis P (2006) Error analysis of weekly station coordinates in the DORIS network. J Geod (in press) Willis P, Heflin M (2004) External validation of the GRACE GGM01C gravity field using GPS and DORIS positioning results. Geophys Res Lett 31(13):L13616. DOI 10.1029/2004GL020038Google Scholar
  25. Willis P, Ries J (2005) Defining a DORIS core network for Jason-1 precise orbit determination based on ITRF2000: methods and realization. J Geod 79(6–7):370–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Willis P, Bar-Sever YE, Tavernier G (2005a) DORIS as a potential part of a Global Geodetic Observing System. J Geodyn 40(4–5):494–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Willis P, Boucher C, Fagard H, Altamimi Z (2005b) Geodetic applications of the DORIS system at the French Institut Géographique National. CR Geoscience 337(7):653–662Google Scholar
  28. Willis P, Soudarin L, Fagard H, Ries J, Noomen R (2005c) IDS recommendations for ITRF2004. http://ids.cls.fr/html/report/reports.htmlGoogle Scholar
  29. Willis P, Berthias JP, Bar-Sever YE (2006) Systematic errors in the Z-geocenter derived using satellite tracking data, A case study from SPOT-4 DORIS data in 1998. J Geod 79(10–11):567–572. DOI 10.1007/s00190-005-0013-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Géographique NationalMarne-la-ValleeFrance
  2. 2.Institut Géographique NationalMarne-la-ValleeFrance
  3. 3.Conseil Général des Ponts et Chaussées tour Pascal BLa DefenseFrance

Personalised recommendations