Journal of Management Control

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 319–344

Management accounting and the construction of the legitimate manager

Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate why managers use management accounting techniques. Therefore, a qualitative single case study was conducted in an innovative and product-driven firm in which management accounting is considered playing an important role for management and control. Taking a philosophical stance, the case study illustrates how managers use management accounting as a “technology of the self” by which means they reflect and act upon themselves in order to become legitimate actors within the firm. Accordingly, the study shows how management accounting can support managers’ activities of self-control and self-constitution in the context of an institutionalised “regime of truth”.

Keywords

Managers Management accounting Management accountant 

References

  1. Ahrens, T. (1996). Styles of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(2/3), 139–173. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahrens, T. (1997). Strategic interventions of management accountants: everyday practise of British and German brewers. European Accounting Review, 6(4), 557–588. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2004). Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: a field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 271–302. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2006). Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(8), 819–841. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2007). Management accounting as practise. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1–2), 1–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson-Gough, F., Grey, C., & Robson, K. (2005). “Helping them to forget..”: the organisational embedding of gender relations in public audit firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(5), 469–490. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Armstrong, P. (1985). Changing management control strategies: the role of competition between accountancy and other organisational professions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(2), 129–148. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barratt, E. (2008). The later Foucault in organization and management studies. Human Relations, 61(4), 515–537. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baxter, J., & Chua, W. F. (2003). Alternative management accounting research—whence and whither. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 97–126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 359–377. Google Scholar
  11. Burkitt, I. (2002). Technologies of the self: habitus and capacities. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32(2), 219–237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burns, J., & Baldvinsdottir, G. (2005). An institutional perspective of accountants’ new roles—the interplay of contradictions and praxis. European Accounting Review, 14(4), 725–757. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caglio, A. (2003). Enterprise resource planning systems and accountants: towards hybridization? European Accounting Review, 12(1), 123–153. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Callon, M. (1998). The laws of the markets (sociology of cultural studies). Oxford: Blackwell Sci. Google Scholar
  16. Catasús, B. (2008). In search of accounting absence. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(7), 1004–1019. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., Heian, J. B., & Samuel, S. (1998). The calculated and the avowed: techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in big six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 293–327. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cowton, C. J., & Dopson, S. (2002). Foucault’s prison? Management control in an automotive distributor. Management Accounting Research, 13(2), 191–213. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dambrin, C., Lambert, C., & Sponem, S. (2007). Control and change—analysing the process of institutionalisation. Management Accounting Research, 18(2), 172–208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davidson, A. I. (1991). Archaelogy, genealogy, ethics. In D. C. Hoy (Ed.), Foucault: a critical reader (pp. 221–233). Oxford: Blackwell Sci. Google Scholar
  21. Ezzamel, M. (1994). Organizational change and accounting: understanding the budgeting system in its organisational context. Organization Studies, 15(2), 213–240. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ezzamel, M., & Burns, J. (2005). Professional competition, economic value added and management control strategies. Organization Studies, 26(5), 755–777. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  24. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. London: Tavistock. Google Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. (1986). The use of pleasure: volume 2 of the history of sexuality. London: Penguin. Google Scholar
  27. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self. A seminar with Michael Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. Google Scholar
  28. Foucault, M., Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. H. (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. Google Scholar
  29. Francis, J. R. (1990). After virtue? Accounting as a moral and discursive practise. Accounting Auditing & Accountability, 3(3), 5–17. Google Scholar
  30. Granlund, M. (2001). Towards explaining stability in and around management accounting systems. Management Accounting Research, 12(2), 141–166. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hasselbladh, H., & Kallinikos, J. (2000). The project of rationalization: a critique and reappraisal of neo-institutionalism in organization studies. Organization Studies, 21(4), 697–720. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hopper, T., & Macintosh, N. (1993). Management accounting as disciplinary practise: the case of ITT under Harold Geneen. Management Accounting Research, 4(3), 181–216. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hopwood, A. G. (1987). The archeology of accounting systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 207–234. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoskin, K., & Macve, R. (1994). Writing, examining, disciplining: the genesis of accounting’s modern power. In A. Hopwood & P. Miller (Eds.), Accounting as social and institutional practise (pp. 67–97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  35. Jacobs, C., & Heracleous, L. (2001). “Seeing without being seen:” toward an archaeology of controlling science. International Studies of Management & Organization, 31(3), 113–135. Google Scholar
  36. Jones, T. C., & Dugdale, D. (2001). The concept of an accounting regime. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(1), 35–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jönsson, S. (1998). Relate management accounting research to managerial work! Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(4), 411–434. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jönsson, S. (2009). The study of controller agency. In C. S. Chapman, D. J. Cooper, & P. B. Miller (Eds.), Accounting, organizations, and institutions—essays in honour of Anthony Hopwood (pp. 233–259). New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jørgensen, B., & Messner, M. (2010). Accounting and strategising: a case study from new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), 184–204. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kosmala, K., & McKernan, J. F. (2011). From care of the self to care for the other: neglected aspects of Foucault’s late work. Accounting Auditing & Accountability, 24(3), 377–402. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kosmala MacLullich, K. (2003). The emperor’s “new” clothes? New audit regimes: insights from Foucault’s technologies of the self. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14(8), 791–811. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lambert, C., & Pezet, E. (2011). The making of the management accountant—becoming the producer of truthful knowledge. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(1), 10–30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lawrence, T. B. (2008). Power, institutions and organizations. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), Handbook of organisational institutionalism, sage publications (under print) (pp. 170–198). London: Sage. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lawrence, T., Mauws, M., Dyck, B., & Kleysen, R. (2005). The politics of organisational learning: integrating power into the 4i framework. The Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 180–191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lawrence, T. B., Winn, M. I., & Jennings, P. D. (2001). The temporal dynamics of institutionalization. The Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 624–644. Google Scholar
  46. Lounsbury, M. (2008). Institutional rationality and practise variation: new directions in the institutional analysis of practise. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 349–361. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Macintosh, N. B., & Scapens, R. W. (1990). Structuration theory in management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(5), 455–477. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Messner, M. (2009). The limits of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 918–938. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Messner, M., Clegg, S., & Kornberger, M. (2008). Critical practises in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(2), 17–68. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The ‘actors’ of modern society: the cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller, P. (1992). Accounting and objectivity: the invention of calculating selves and calculable spaces. Annals of Scholarship, 9(1/2), 61–86. Google Scholar
  52. Miller, P. (1994). Accounting as social and institutional practise: an introduction. In A. Hopwood & P. Miller (Eds.), Accounting as social and institutional practise (pp. 1–39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  53. Miller, P. (2001). Governing by numbers: why calculative practices matter. Social research, 68(2), 379–396. Google Scholar
  54. Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (1987). Accounting and the construction of the governable person. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 235–265. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Morgan, G. (1988). Accounting as reality construction: towards a new epistemology for accounting practise. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(5), 477–485. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Oakes, L. S., Townley, B., & Cooper, D. J. (1998). Business planning as pedagogy: language and control in a changing institutional field. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 257–292. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. Google Scholar
  58. Randall, J., & Munro, I. (2010). Foucault’s care of the self: a case from mental health work. Organization Studies, 31(11), 1485–1504. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Roberts, J. (2009). No one is perfect: the limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 957–970. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roberts, J., Sanderson, P., Barker, R., & Hendry, J. (2006). In the mirror of the market: the disciplinary effects of company/fund manager meetings. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(3), 277–294. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rose, N. (1991). Governing by numbers: figuring out democracy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(7), 673–692. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Strauß, E., & Zecher, C. (2012). Management control systems: a review. J Manage Control, in press. Google Scholar
  63. Styhre, A. (2001). Kaizen, ethics, and care of the operations: management after empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), 795–810. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Townley, B. (1995). Know thyself’: self-awareness, self-formation and managing. Organization, 2(2), 271–289. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vaivio, J. (1999). Examining “the quantified customer”. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(8), 689–715. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vollmer, H. (2003). Bookkeeping, accounting, calculative practise: the sociological suspense of calculation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14(3), 353–381. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vollmer, H. (2007). How to do more with numbers: elementary stakes, framing, keying, and the three-dimensional character of numerical signs. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(6), 577–600. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weber, J. (2011). The development of controller tasks: explaining the nature of controllership and its changes. Journal of Management Control, 22(1), 25–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations