Zeitschrift für Planung & Unternehmenssteuerung

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 255–275 | Cite as

Voluntary disclosure of intellectual capital items in roadshows and investor conferences: an empirical analysis of DAX30-companies

  • Frank SchiemannEmail author
  • Kai Richter
  • Thomas Günther
Original Paper


We analyze firms’ voluntary disclosure of intellectual capital in a setting of presentations to analysts and investors. Firms use presentations to analysts and investors as an additional means of reporting. Due to lesser restrictions of this kind of reporting and also due to the private channel disclosure setting of such presentations, firms are able to highlight certain issues which they think to be important for interpretation and forecasting of firm success. In such a setting we can assess the benefit-cost relation underlying these disclosure decisions. The sample consists of German DAX30 firms, which are analyzed for the years 2001, 2003, 2005, and 2007, resulting in a total of 271 observations. We calculate quantitative and qualitative disclosure indices and also analyze whether time, industry and type of presentation influence intellectual capital disclosure. Findings show that customer capital, human capital, and process capital are reported more often than other intellectual capital categories. Industry and type of presentation are strongly related to disclosure indices. There is also a weak significant relation between time and disclosure index. Overall, firms tend to prefer qualitative voluntary disclosure of intellectual capital and only carefully disclose quantitative data. This suggests that the benefit-cost relation of quantitative reporting is negative.


Voluntary disclosure Intellectual capital Private channel communication Non-financials Value reporting 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arbeitskreis “Immaterielle Werte im Rechnungswesen” der Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft für Betriebswirtschaft e. V. (2001). Kategorisierung und bilanzielle Erfassung immaterieller Werte. Der Betrieb, 54(19), 989–995. Google Scholar
  2. Arbeitskreis “Immaterielle Werte im Rechnungswesen” der Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft für Betriebswirtschaft e. V. (2005). Corporate reporting on intangibles—a proposal from a German background. Schmalenbach Business Review (SBR), 57(5), 65–100. Google Scholar
  3. Baiman, S., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1996). The relation among capital markets, financial disclosure, production efficiency, and insider trading. Journal of Accounting Research, 34(1), 1–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barth, M. E., Clinch, G., & Shibano, T. (1999). International accounting harmonization and global equity markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26(1–3), 201–235. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2007). Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(2), 269–296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. Accounting Review, 72(3), 323–349. Google Scholar
  7. Choi, Y.-S., O’Hanlon, J., & Pope, P. F. (2006). Conservative accounting and linear information valuation models. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 73–101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Directive 2003/6/EC (2003). Directive 2003/6/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 28 January 2003 on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse). 2003/6/EC. European Union. Google Scholar
  9. Ferguson, M. J., Lam, K. C. K., & Lee, G. M. (2002). Voluntary disclosure by state-owned enterprises listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 13(2), 125–152. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. García-Meca, E., & Martinez, I. (2007). The use of intellectual capital information in investment decisions: An empirical study using analyst reports. International Journal of Accounting, 42(1), 57–81. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. García-Meca, E., Parra, I., Larran, M., & Martínez, I. (2005). The explanatory factors of intellectual capital disclosure to financial analysts. European Accounting Review, 14(1), 63–94. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerpott, T. J., Thomas, S. E., & Hoffmann, A. P. (2008). Intangible asset disclosure in the telecommunications industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(1), 37–61. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Günther, T. (1997). Unternehmenswertorientiertes Controlling. München: Franz Vahlen. Google Scholar
  14. Günther, T., Beyer, D., & Menninger, J. (2005). Does relevance influence reporting about environmental and intangible success factors? Empirical results from a survey of executives from intangible-driven industries. Schmalenbach Business Review, 57(5), 101–138. Google Scholar
  15. Holland, J., & Johanson, U. (2003). Value-relevant information on corporate intangibles—creation, use, and barriers in capital markets—“between a rock and a hard place”. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(4), 465–486. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kirby, A. J. (1988). Trade associations as information exchange mechanisms. RAND Journal of Economics (RAND Journal of Economics), 19(1), 138–146. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirchner-Khairy, S. (2006). Mess- und Bewertungskonzepte immaterieller Ressourcen im kybernetischen Controlling-Kreislauf. Dresden: TU Dresden. Google Scholar
  18. Lambert, R., Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2007). Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(2), 385–420. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. D. (2008). Economic consequences of financial reporting and disclosure regulation: a review and suggestions for future research. SSRN eLibrary. Google Scholar
  20. Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: management, measurement, and reporting. Washington: Brookings Institution. Google Scholar
  21. Marston, C. (2008). Investor relations meetings: evidence from the top 500 UK companies. Accounting & Business Research, 38(1), 21–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 10(4), 297–308. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Regulation (EC) No. 1606/2002 (2002). Regulation (EC) No. 1606/2002 of the European parliament and of the council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards. Google Scholar
  24. Riegler, C., & Kristandl, G. (2004). Value Reporting in österreichischen Unternehmen – Beobachtung des Berichtverhaltens von ATX und ATX-Prime Unternehmen. In G. Seicht (Ed.), Jahrbuch für Controlling und Rechnungswesen 2004 (pp. 245–267). Wien: LexisNexis. Google Scholar
  25. Shleifer, A., & Wolfenzon, D. (2002). Investor protection and equity markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 66(1), 3–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Striukova, L., Unerman, J., & Guthrie, J. (2008). Corporate reporting of intellectual capital: Evidence from UK companies. British Accounting Review, 40(4), 297–313. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tasker, S. C. (1998). Bridging the information gap: quarterly conference calls as a medium for voluntary disclosure. Review of Accounting Studies, 3(1/2), 137–167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Verrecchia, R. E. (1983). Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 5(3), 179–194. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Verrecchia, R. E. (1990). Information quality and discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 12(4), 365–380. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 32(1-3), 97–180. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations