Advertisement

Mathematical Methods of Operations Research

, Volume 85, Issue 2, pp 155–177 | Cite as

Pricing and clearing combinatorial markets with singleton and swap orders

Efficient algorithms for the futures opening auction problem
  • Johannes C. Müller
  • Sebastian Pokutta
  • Alexander Martin
  • Susanne Pape
  • Andrea Peter
  • Thomas Winter
Original Article
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

In this article we consider combinatorial markets with valuations only for singletons and pairs of buy/sell-orders for swapping two items in equal quantity. We provide an algorithm that permits polynomial time market-clearing and -pricing. The results are presented in the context of our main application: the futures opening auction problem. Futures contracts are an important tool to mitigate market risk and counterparty credit risk. In futures markets these contracts can be traded with varying expiration dates and underlyings. A common hedging strategy is to roll positions forward into the next expiration date, however this strategy comes with significant operational risk. To address this risk, exchanges started to offer so-called futures contract combinations, which allow the traders for swapping two futures contracts with different expiration dates or for swapping two futures contracts with different underlyings. In theory, the price is in both cases the difference of the two involved futures contracts. However, in particular in the opening auctions price inefficiencies often occur due to suboptimal clearing, leading to potential arbitrage opportunities. We present a minimum cost flow formulation of the futures opening auction problem that guarantees consistent prices. The core ideas are to model orders as arcs in a network, to enforce the equilibrium conditions with the help of two hierarchical objectives, and to combine these objectives into a single weighted objective while preserving the price information of dual optimal solutions. The resulting optimization problem can be solved in polynomial time and computational tests establish an empirical performance suitable for production environments.

Keywords

Equilibrium problems Hierarchical objectives Linear programming Network flows Combinatorial auctions Futures exchanges 

Mathematics Subject Classification

90C33 90C29 90C05 90C35 91B26 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We want to thank M. Rudel for providing us insight into his research results and for providing us with his test data that enabled us to quickly verify our model. We also would like to thank H. Schäfer for supporting our work and D. Weninger and A. Jüttner for the helpful discussions. We thank the DFG for their support within projects A05 and B07 in CRC TRR 154. Last but not least, we would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments.

References

  1. Ahuja RK, Magnanti TL, Orlin JB (1993) Network flows: theory, algorithms, and applications. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow KJ, Debreu G (1954) Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22(3):265–290MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumrosen L, Nisan N (2007) Combinatorial auctions. Algorithmic game theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 267–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Bünnagel U, Korte B, Vygen J (1998) Efficient implementation of the Goldberg–Tarjan minimum-cost flow algorithm. Optim Methods Softw 10(2):157–174. doi: 10.1080/10556789808805709 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper CL (2015) The Blackwell encyclopedia of management, vol IV Finance. Online reference: Rollover Risk. Blackwell Publishing, http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/book.html?id=g9780631233176_9780631233176
  7. de Vries S, Vohra RV (2003) Combinatorial auctions: a survey. INFORMS J Comput 15(3):284–309. doi: 10.1287/ijoc.15.3.284.16077 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Gould MD, Porter MA, Williams S, McDonald M, Fenn DJ, Howison SD (2013) Limit order books. Quant Finance 13(11):1709–1742. doi: 10.1080/14697688.2013.803148 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoffman AJ, Kruskal JB (1956) Integral boundary points of convex polyhedra. In: Linear inequalities and related systems, annals of mathematics studies, no. 38, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 223–246Google Scholar
  10. Hull JC (2006) Options, futures, and other derivatives, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, New JerseyzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Király Z, Kovács P (2012) Efficient implementations of minimum-cost flow algorithms. Acta Univ Sapientiae Inform 4(1):67–118 arXiv:1207.6381 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Lemon (2014) Library for efficient modeling and optimization in networks. Version: 1.3. http://lemon.cs.elte.hu
  13. Martin A, Müller JC, Pokutta S (2014) Strict linear prices in non-convex European day-ahead electricity markets. Optim Methods Softw 29(1):189–221. doi: 10.1080/10556788.2013.823544. arXiv:1203.4177 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Müller JC (2014) Auctions in exchange trading systems: modeling techniques and algorithms. PhD thesis, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, doi: 10.13140/2.1.1621.8405, urn:nbn:de:bvb:29-opus4-53396
  16. Orlin JB (1997) A polynomial time primal network simplex algorithm for minimum cost flows. Math Programming 78(2, Ser. B):109–129, doi: 10.1007/BF02614365, network optimization: algorithms and applications (San Miniato, 1993)
  17. Winter T, Rudel M, Lalla H, Brendgen S, Geißler B, Martin A, Morsi A (2011) System and method for performing an opening auction of a derivative. https://www.google.de/patents/US20110119170, Pub. No.: US 2011/0119170 A1. US Patent App. 12/618,410
  18. Winter T, Müller JC, Martin A, Pape S, Peter A, Pokutta S (2014) Method and system for performing an opening auction of a derivative. http://www.google.com/patents/US20140372275, Pub. No.: US 2014/0372275 A1. US Patent App. 13/920,041

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes C. Müller
    • 1
  • Sebastian Pokutta
    • 2
  • Alexander Martin
    • 1
  • Susanne Pape
    • 1
  • Andrea Peter
    • 1
  • Thomas Winter
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsFAU Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany
  2. 2.ISyE, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Eurex Frankfurt AGFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations