Models with commutative orthogonal block structure, COBS, have orthogonal block structure, OBS, and their least square estimators for estimable vectors are, as it will be shown, best linear unbiased estimator, BLUE. Commutative Jordan algebras will be used to study the algebraic structure of the models and to define special types of models for which explicit expressions for the estimation of variance components are obtained. Once normality is assumed, inference using pivot variables is quite straightforward. To illustrate this class of models we will present unbalanced examples before considering families of models. When the models in a family correspond to the treatments of a base design, the family is structured. It will be shown how, under quite general conditions, the action of the factors in the base design on estimable vectors, can be studied.
Commutative orthogonal block structure Commutative Jordan algebras Estimation Mixed linear models
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for useful comments and suggestions. This work was partially supported by CMA / FCT / UNL, under the project PEst-OE/MAT/UI0297/2014, and by the Center of Mathematics, University of Beira Interior under the project PEst-OE/MAT/UI0212/2014.
Caliński T, Kageyama S (2000) Block designs. A randomization approach. Volume I: analysis. Lecture notes in statistics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Caliński T, Kageyama S (2003) Block designs. A randomization approach. Volume II: design. Lecture notes in statistics. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho F, Mexia JT, Oliveira MM (2008) Canonic inference and commutative orthogonal block structure. Discuss Math Prob Stat 28(2):171–181zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Fonseca M, Mexia JT, Zmyślony R (2003) Estimators and tests for variance components in cross nested orthogonal models. Discuss Math Probab Stat 23:173–201Google Scholar
Fonseca M, Mexia JT, Zmyślony R (2006) Binary operation on Jordan algebras and orthogonal normal models. Linear Algebr Appl 417(1):75–86CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Fonseca M, Mexia JT, Zmyślony R (2008) Inference in normal models with commutative orthogonal block structure. Acta et Commentationes Universitatis Tartunesis de Mathematica 12:3–16zbMATHGoogle Scholar
Jordan P, von Neumann J, Wigner E (1934) On the algebraic generalization of the quantum mechanical formalism. Ann Math 35(1):29–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mexia JT (1987) Multi-treatment regression designs. Trabalhos de Investigação, No 1. Departamento de Matemática, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de LisboaGoogle Scholar
Mexia JT (1990) Best linear unbiased estimates, duality of \(F\) tests and the Scheff multiple comparison method in presence of controlled heterocedasticity. Comput Stat Data Anal 10:271–281CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Moreira EE, Ribeiro AB, Mateus E, Mexia JT, Ottosen LM (2005a) Regressional modelling of electrodialytic removal of Cu, Cr and As from CCA timber waste: application to sawdust. Wood Sci Technol 39(4):291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreira EE, Mexia JT, Ribeiro AB, Mateus E, Ottosen LM (2005b) Regressional modelling of electrodialytic removal of Cu, Cr and As from CCA timber waste: application to wood chips. Listy Biometryczne 42(1):11–23Google Scholar
Moreira E, Mexia JT (2007) Multiple regression models with cross nested orthogonal base model. In: Proceedings of the 56th session of the ISI 2007—International Statistical Institute, LisboaGoogle Scholar
Moreira E (2008) Família estruturada de modelos com base ortogonal: teoria e aplicações, Ph.D. Thesis, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
Nelder JA (1965a) The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure. I. Block structure and the null analysis of variance. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 283(1393):147–162CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Nelder JA (1965b) The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure. II. Treatment, structure and the general analysis of variance. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 283(1393):163–178CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Schott JR (1997) Matrix analysis for statistics. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar