# Lies and consequences

- 97 Downloads
- 1 Citations

## Abstract

I study a strategic-communication game between an informed sender and an uninformed receiver with partially aligned preferences. The receiver is endowed with the ability to probabilistically detect if the sender is lying. Specifically, if the sender is making a false claim about her type, with some commonly known probability *p* the receiver additionally observes a private signal indicating that the sender is lying. The main result is that the receiver’s stochastic lie-detection ability makes fully revealing equilibria—the best outcome for the receiver—possible, even for small *p* (less than \(\frac{1}{2}\)). Additionally, if the language consists of precise messages, fully revealing equilibria exist only for \(p=1\) and for a set of intermediate values of *p* that is bounded away from 0 and 1, making the maximal ex-ante expected equilibrium utility of the receiver non-monotone in *p*. If vague messages are allowed, full revelation can be supported for all large enough *p*, overturning the non-monotonicity and improving communication outcomes relative to the precise-language case.

## Keywords

Cheap talk Persuasion game Lie detection## JEL Classification

D83## Notes

### Acknowledgements

I have greatly benefited from comments from the associate editor, the anonymous referees and from David Ahn, Wioletta Dziuda, Haluk Ergin, Nisvan Erkal, Joseph Farrell, Johannes Hörner, Yuichiro Kamada, Maciej Kotowski, Botond Kőszegi, Matthew Leister, Simon Loertscher, Cesar Martinelli, John Morgan, Takeshi Murooka, Omar Nayeem, Santiago Oliveros, In-Uck Park, Matthew Rabin, Roberto Raimondo, Antonio Rosato, Emilia Tjernström, Steven Williams, and participants at the 2016 APET Workshop on Democracy, Public Policy, and Information at Deakin University. Any remaining errors are my own.

## References

- Ambrus A, Azevedo E, Kamada Y (2013) Hierarchical cheap talk. Theor Econ 8(1):233–261Google Scholar
- Banks J (1990) A model of electoral competition with incomplete information. J Econ Theory 50(2):309–325Google Scholar
- Belot M, van de Ven J (2017) How private is private information? The ability to spot deception in an economic game. Exp Econ 20(1):19–43Google Scholar
- Belot M, Bhaskar V, van de Ven J (2012) Can observers predict trustworthiness? Rec Econ Stat 94(1):246–259Google Scholar
- Bernheim B, Severinov S (2003) Bequests as signals: an explanation for the equal division puzzle. J Polit Econ 111(4):733–764Google Scholar
- Blume A, Board O, Kawamura K (2007) Noisy talk. Theor Econ 2(4):395–440Google Scholar
- Border K, Sobel J (1987) Samurai accountant: a theory of auditing and plunder. Rev Econ Stud 54(4):525–540Google Scholar
- Brosig J (2002) Identifying cooperative behavior: some experimental results in a prisoner’s dilemma game. J Econ Behav Organ 47(3):275–290Google Scholar
- Callander S, Wilkie S (2007) Lies, damned lies, and political campaigns. Games Econ Behav 60(2):262–286Google Scholar
- Celik G (2006) Mechanism design with weaker incentive compatibility constraints. Games Econ Behav 56(1):37–44Google Scholar
- Chen J, Houser D (2016) Promises and lies: can observers detect deception in written messages. Exp EconGoogle Scholar
- Chen Y (2009) Communication with two-sided asymmetric information. MimeoGoogle Scholar
- Chen Y (2011) Perturbed communication games with honest senders and naive receivers. J Econ Theory 146(2):401–424Google Scholar
- Chen Y (2012) Value of public information in sender-receiver games. Econ Lett 114(3):343–345Google Scholar
- Chen Y, Kartik N, Sobel J (2008) Selecting cheap-talk equilibria. Econometrica 76(1):117–136Google Scholar
- Crawford V, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6):1431–1451Google Scholar
- Deneckere R, Severinov S (2008) Mechanism design with partial state verifiability. Games Econ Behav 64(2):487–513Google Scholar
- Duffy J, Feltovich N (2006) Words, deeds, and lies: strategic behaviour in games with multiple signals. Rev Econ Stud 73(3):669–688Google Scholar
- Dziuda W, Salas C (2018) Communication with detectable deceit. MimeoGoogle Scholar
- Ekman P (2009) Telling lies: clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. W. W. NortonGoogle Scholar
- Farrell J (1993) Meaning and credibility in cheap-talk games. Games Econ Behav 5(4):514–531Google Scholar
- Farrell J, Rabin M (1996) Cheap talk. J Econ Perspect 10(3):103–118Google Scholar
- Forges F, Koessler F (2005) Communication equilibria with partially verifiable types. J Math Econ 41(7):793–811Google Scholar
- Frank R, Gilovich T, Regan D (1993) The evolution of one-shot cooperation: an experiment. Ethol Sociobiol 14(4):247–256Google Scholar
- Frohlich N, Oppenheimer J (1998) Some consequences of e-mail vs. face-to-face communication in experiments. J Econ Behav Organ 35(3):389–403Google Scholar
- Glazer J, Rubinstein A (2012) A model of persuasion with boundedly rational agents. J Polit Econ 120(6):1057–1082Google Scholar
- Golosov M, Skreta V, Tsyvinski A, Wilson A (2014) Dynamic strategic information transmission. J Econ Theory 151:304–341Google Scholar
- Goltsman M, Hörner J, Pavlov G, Squintani F (2009) Mediation, arbitration and negotiation. J Econ Theory 144(4):1397–1420Google Scholar
- Green J, Laffont J (1986) Partially verifiable information and mechanism design. Rev Econ Stud 53(3):447–456Google Scholar
- Grossman S (1981) The informational role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality. J Law Econ 24(3):461–483Google Scholar
- Hagenbach J, Koessler F, Perez-Richet E (2014) Certifiable pre-play communication: full disclosure. Econometrica 82(3):1093–1131Google Scholar
- Hayano D (1980) Communicative competency among poker players. J Commun 30(2):113–120Google Scholar
- Hodler R, Loertscher S, Rohner D (2014) Persuasion, binary choice, and the costs of dishonesty. Econ Lett 124(2):195–198Google Scholar
- Holm H (2010) Truth and lie detection in bluffing. J Econ Behav Organ 76(2):318–324Google Scholar
- Holm H, Kawagoe T (2010) Face-to-face lying—an experimental study in Sweden and Japan. J Econ Psychol 31(3):310–321Google Scholar
- Ishida J, Shimizu T (2016) Cheap talk with an informed receiver. Econ Theory Bull 4(1):61–72Google Scholar
- Ivanov M (2010) Communication via a strategic mediator. J Econ Theory 145(2):869–884Google Scholar
- Kartik N (2009) Strategic communication with lying costs. Rev Econ Stud 76(4):1359–1395Google Scholar
- Kartik N, Ottaviani M, Squintani F (2007) Credulity, lies, and costly talk. J Econ Theory 134(1):93–116Google Scholar
- Lai E (2014) Expert advice for amateurs. J Econ Behav Organ 103:1–16Google Scholar
- Lipman B, Seppi D (1995) Robust inference in communication games with partial provability. J Econ Theory 66(2):370–405Google Scholar
- Loftus E, Hoffman H (1989) Misinformation and memory: the creation of new memories. J Exp Psychol Gen 118(1):100–104Google Scholar
- Martinelli C, Parker S (2009) Deception and misreporting in a social program. J Eur Econ Assoc 7(4):886–908Google Scholar
- Mathis J (2008) Full revelation of information in sender-receiver games of persuasion. J Econ Theory 143(1):571–584Google Scholar
- Matthews S, Okuno-Fujiwara M, Postlewaite A (1991) Refining cheap-talk equilibria. J Econ Theory 55(2):247–273Google Scholar
- Milgrom P (1981) Good news and bad news: representation theorems and applications. Bell J Econ 12(2):380–391Google Scholar
- Mookherjee D, Png I (1989) Optimal auditing, insurance, and redistribution. Q J Econ 104(2):399–415Google Scholar
- Myerson R (1991) Game theory: analysis of conflict. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Mylovanov T, Zapechelnyuk A (2017) Optimal allocation with ex post verification and limited penalties. Am Econ Rev 107(9):2666–2694Google Scholar
- Olszewski W (2004) Informal communication. J Econ Theory 117(2):180–200Google Scholar
- Ottaviani M (2000) The economics of advice. MimeoGoogle Scholar
- Ottaviani M, Squintani F (2006) Naive audience and communication bias. Int J Game Theory 35(1):129–150Google Scholar
- Radner R, Schotter A (1989) The sealed-bid mechanism: an experimental study. J Econ Theory 48(1):179–220Google Scholar
- Seidmann D, Winter E (1997) Strategic information transmission with verifiable messages. Econometrica 65(1):163–169Google Scholar
- Sobel J (2009) Signaling games. In: Meyers R (ed) Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science. Springer, New York, NY, pp 8125–8139Google Scholar
- Sobel J (2013) Giving and receiving advice. In: Acemoglu D, Arellano M, Dekel E (eds) Advances in economics and econometrics: tenth World Congress. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Townsend R (1979) Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification. J Econ Theory 21(2):265–93Google Scholar
- Valley K, Moag J, Bazerman M (1998) ‘A matter of trust’: effects of communication on the efficiency and distribution of outcomes. J Econ Behav Organ 34(2):211–238Google Scholar
- Valley K, Thompson L, Gibbons R, Bazerman M (2002) How communication improves efficiency in bargaining games. Games Econ Behav 38(1):127–155Google Scholar
- Vrij A (2008) Detecting lies and deceit. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Spezio M, Camerer C (2010) Pinocchio’s pupil: using eyetracking and pupil dilation to understand truth telling and deception in sender-receiver games. Am Econ Rev 100(3):984–1007Google Scholar