Advertisement

PSPACE-complete two-color planar placement games

  • Kyle Burke
  • Robert A. Hearn
Original Paper

Abstract

We show that the classic placement games Col and Snort are PSPACE-complete, resolving an open question of Schaefer (1978). We then show the related placement games Fjords and NoGo PSPACE-complete on planar graphs. All but NoGo are shown hard by reductions from Bounded 2-Player Constraint Logic; we then reduce Col to NoGo. The only previous complexity results for these games were that Col and Snort played on general graphs are PSPACE-complete, and NoGo is NP-hard on general graphs.

Keywords

Complexity PSPACE Combinatorial game 

References

  1. Albert Michael H, Nowakowski Richard J, Wolfe David (2007) Lessons in play: an introduction to combinatorial game theory. A. K. Peters, WellesleyGoogle Scholar
  2. Berlekamp Elwyn R, Conway John H, Guy Richard K (2001) Winning ways for your mathematical plays, vol 1. A K Peters, WellesleyGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown JI, Danielle C, Andrew H, Neil M, Rebecca M, Nowakowski RJ, Siegel AA. Polynomial profiles of placement games. To appear in Games of No Chance 5Google Scholar
  4. Alessandro C (2009) Three-player col played on trees is np-complete. In: Proc. of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2009, 445–447. Newswood LimitedGoogle Scholar
  5. Conway John H (2001) On numbers and games, 2nd edn. A K PetersGoogle Scholar
  6. Demaine ED, Hearn RA (2008) Constraint logic: a uniform framework for modeling computation as games. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (Complexity 2008), pp 149–162, College Park, Maryland, June 23–26Google Scholar
  7. Demaine Erik D, Hearn RA (2009) Playing games with algorithms: algorithmic combinatorial game theory. In: Albert Michael H, Nowakowski Richard J (eds) Games of No Chance 3, volume 56 of Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–56Google Scholar
  8. Fenner SA, Grier D, Messner J, Schaeffer L, Thierauf Thomas (2015) Game values and computational complexity: an analysis via black-white combinatorial games. In: Elbassioni Khaled M, Makino Kazuhisa (eds) ISAAC, volume 9472 of lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 689–699Google Scholar
  9. Hearn RA (2008) Amazons, Konane, and Cross Purposes are PSPACE-complete. In: Albert Michael H, Nowakowski Richard J (eds) Games of no chance 3. Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, vol 56. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 287–306Google Scholar
  10. Hearn RA, Demaine ED (2009) Games, puzzles and computation. A K Peters, WellesleyGoogle Scholar
  11. Schaefer Thomas J (1978) On the complexity of some two-person perfect-information games. J Comput Syst Sci 16(2):185–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plymouth State UniversityPlymouthUSA
  2. 2.Portola ValleyUSA

Personalised recommendations