Advertisement

International Journal of Game Theory

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 509–542 | Cite as

Impartial achievement and avoidance games for generating finite groups

  • Dana C. Ernst
  • Nándor Sieben
Original Paper
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

We study two impartial games introduced by Anderson and Harary and further developed by Barnes. Both games are played by two players who alternately select previously unselected elements of a finite group. The first player who builds a generating set from the jointly selected elements wins the first game. The first player who cannot select an element without building a generating set loses the second game. After the development of some general results, we determine the nim-numbers of these games for abelian and dihedral groups. We also present some conjectures based on computer calculations. Our main computational and theoretical tool is the structure diagram of a game, which is a type of identification digraph of the game digraph that is compatible with the nim-numbers of the positions. Structure diagrams also provide simple yet intuitive visualizations of these games that capture the complexity of the positions.

Keywords

Impartial game Maximal subgroup Structure diagram 

Mathematics Subject Classification

91A46 20D30 

References

  1. Albert M, Nowakowski R, Wolfe D (2007) Lessons in play: an introduction to combinatorial game theory. AMC 10:12Google Scholar
  2. Anderson M, Harary F (1987) Achievement and avoidance games for generating abelian groups. Int J Game Theory 16(4):321–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes FW (1988) Some games of F. Harary, based on finite groups. Ars Combin 25(A):21–30 Eleventh British Combinatorial Conference (London, 1987)Google Scholar
  4. Brandenburg M (2017) Algebraic games playing with groups and rings. Int J Game Theory 1–34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-017-0577-7
  5. Dixon JD (1967) Problems in group theory. Blaisdell Publishing Co. Ginn and Co., Waltham, Toronto, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Dlab V (1960) The Frattini subgroups of abelian groups. Czechoslovak Math J 10(1):Google Scholar
  7. Dummit DS, Foote RM (2004) Abstract algebra, 3rd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  8. Ernst DC, Sieben N (2013) Companion web site. http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/ns46/GroupGenGame. Accessed 24 Nov 2017
  9. Fraenkel AS, Perl Y (1975) Constructions in combinatorial games with cycles, Infinite and finite sets (Colloq., Keszthely, 1973; dedicated to P. Erdős on his 60th birthday), Vol. II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 667–699. Colloq. Math. Soc. Janós Bolyai, Vol. 10Google Scholar
  10. Jacobson N (1985) Basic algebra. I, 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Rose JS (1994) A course on group theory. Dover Publications Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Siegel AN (2013) Combinatorial game theory, graduate studies in mathematics, vol 146. American Mathematical Society, ProvidenceCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith CAB (1966) Graphs and composite games. J Comb Theory 1:51–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Suzuki M (1982) Group theory. I. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften. vol. 247, Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. The GAP Group (2013) GAP–Groups, algorithms, and programming. Version 4.6.4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Personalised recommendations