International Journal of Game Theory

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 631–645 | Cite as

On restricted bargaining sets

  • Javier Hervés-Estévez
  • Emma Moreno-García


In this paper we analyze the behavior of bargaining sets in continuum economies when there are restrictions on the formation of coalitions. We provide several characterizations of Vind’s (J Math Econ 21:89–97, 1992) bargaining set in terms of its restricted versions, where not all the coalitions are formed. Moreover, we show that these equivalences do not hold for Mas-Colell’s (J Math Econ 18:129–139, 1989) bargaining set. These findings highlight the different nature of both notions of bargaining sets. Finally, we illustrate the impossibility of extrapolating our results to a more general setting.


Bargaining sets Coalitions Core Veto mechanism 

JEL Classification

D51 D11 D00 



This work is partially supported by the Research Grants ECO2012-38860-C02-01 and 02 (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad), RGEA and 10PXIB300141PR (Xunta de Galicia and FEDER). We are grateful to N. Allouch, J. Correia-da-Silva, M. Faias, G. Graziano, C. Hervés-Beloso, L. Koutsougeras, J. P. Torres-Martínez, the participants in the Simposio de la Asociación Española de Economía, December, 2012, and in the Naples Workshop on Economic Theory, January, 2013. We also thank an associated editor and two anonymous referees for comments and suggestions that indeed helped to improve the final version of this work.


  1. Aumann RJ (1964) Markets with a continuum of traders. Econometrica 32:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aumann R, Maschler M (1964) The bargaining set for cooperative games. In: Dresher M, Shapley LS, Tucker AW (eds) Advances in game theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 443–447Google Scholar
  3. Evren O, Hüsseinov F (2008) Theorems on the core of an economy with infinitely many commodities and consumers. J Math Econ 44:1180–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grodal B (1972) A second remark on the core of an atomless economy. Econometrica 40:581–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hervés-Beloso C, Moreno-García E, Núñez-Sanz C, Páscoa M (2000) Blocking efficacy of small coalitions in myopic economies. J Econ Theory 93:72–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hervés-Beloso C, Moreno-García E (2008) Competitive equilibria and the grand coalition. J Math Econ 44:697–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mas-Colell A (1989) An equivalence theorem for a bargaining set. J Math Econ 18:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ostroy JM, Zame WR (1994) Nonatomic economies and the boundaries of perfect competition. Econometrica 62:593–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pesce M (2010) On mixed markets with asymmetric information. Econ Theory 45:23–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schjødt U, Sloth B (1994) Bargaining sets with small coalitions. Int J Game Theory 23:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schmeidler D (1972) A remark on the core of an atomless economy. Econometrica 40:579–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vind K (1972) A third remark on the core of an atomless economy. Econometrica 40:585–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vind K (1992) Two characterizations of bargaining sets. J Math Econ 21:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad de VigoVigoSpain
  2. 2.Universidad de SalamancaSalamancaSpain

Personalised recommendations