International Journal of Game Theory

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 337–352 | Cite as

On participation games with complete information

Original Paper

Abstract

We analyze a class of two-candidate voter participation games under complete information that encompasses as special cases certain public good provision games. We characterize the Nash equilibria of these games as stationary points of a non-linear programming problem, the objective function of which is a Morse function (onethat does not admit degenerate critical points) for almost all costs of participation. We use this fact to establish that, outside a closed set of measure zero of participation costs, all equilibria of these games are regular (an alternative to the result of De Sinopoli and Iannantuoni in Econ Theory 25(2):477–486, 2005). One consequence of regularity is that the equilibria of these games are robust to the introduction of (mild) incomplete information. Finally, we establish the existence of monotone Nash equilibria, such that players with higher participation cost abstain with (weakly) higher probability.

Keywords

Turnout Public goods Regular equilibrium Monotone equilibrium 

JEL Classification Numbers

C72 D72 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrich J (1993) Rational choice and turnout. Am J Polit Sci 37(1):246–279Google Scholar
  2. De Sinopoli F, Iannantuoni G (2005) On the generic strategic stability of Nash equilibria if voting is costly. Econ Theory 25(2):477–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Feddersen T (2004) Rational choice theory and the paradox of not voting. J Econ Perspect 18(1):99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Govindan S, Reny PJ, Robson AJ (2003) A short proof of Harsanyi’s purification theorem. Games Econ Behav 45(2):369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guillemin V, Pollack A (1974) Differential topology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  6. Harsanyi JC (1973a) Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: a new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points. Int J Game Theory 2:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harsanyi JC (1973b) Oddness of the number of equilibrium points: a new proof. Int J Game Theory 2:235–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Palfrey T, Rosenthal H (1983) A strategic calculus of voting. Public Choice 41(1):7–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Palfrey T, Rosenthal H (1984) Participation and the provision of public goods: a strategic analysis. J Public Econ 24(2):171–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Palfrey T, Rosenthal H (1985) Voter participation and strategic uncertainty. Am Polit Sci Rev 79(1):62–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. van Damme E (1987) Stability and perfection of Nash equilibria. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations