International Journal of Game Theory

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 425–442 | Cite as

A model of interim information sharing under incomplete information

  • Antonio Jiménez-MartínezEmail author
Original Article


We propose a two-person game-theoretical model to study information sharing decisions at an interim stage when information is incomplete. The two agents have pieces of private information about the state of nature, and that information is improved by combining the pieces. Agents are both senders and receivers of information. There is an institutional arrangement that fixes a transfer of wealth from an agent who lies about her private information. In our model, we show that (1) there is a positive relation between information revelation and the amount of the transfers, and (2) information revelation has a collective action structure, in particular, the incentives of an agent to reveal decrease with respect to the amount of information disclosed by the other.


Incomplete information Information revelation Costly signaling 

JEL Classification Numbers

C72 D82 D83 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aumann RJ, Hart S (2003) Long cheap talk. Econometrica 71:1619–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austen-Smith D, Banks JS (2000) Cheap talk and burned money. J Econ Theory 91:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernheim BD, Severinov S (2003) Bequests as signals: an explanation for the equal division puzzle. J Polit Econ 111:733–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crawford VP, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50:1431–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gal-Or E (1985) Information sharing in oligopoly. Econometrica 53:329–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Green JR, Stokey NL (1980) A two-person game of information transmission. Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion Paper, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Kartik N (2005) Information transmission with cheap talk and almost cheap talk. Mimeo University of California, San Diego, pp 433–446Google Scholar
  8. Koessler F (2004) Strategic knowledge sharing in Bayesian games. Games Econ Behav 48:292–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kreps D, Wilson R (1982) Sequential equilibria. Econometrica 50:863–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li L (1985) Cournot oligopoly with information sharing. RAND J Econ 16(4):521–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Millon MH, Thakor AV (1985) Moral hazard and information sharing: a model of financial information gathering agencies. J Finance 40(5):1403–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Okuno-Fujiwara M, Postlewaite A, Suzumura K (1990) Strategic information revelation. Rev Econ Stud 57:25–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pagano M, Jappelli T (1993) Information sharing in credit markets. J Finance 48(5):1693–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raith M (1996) A general model of information sharing in oligopoly. J Econ Theory 71:260–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rothschild M, Stiglitz JE (1976) Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: an essay on the economics of imperfect information. Q J Econ 80:629–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shapiro C (1986) Exchange of cost information in oligopoly. Rev Econ Stud 53:433–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Spence AM (1974) Market signaling. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilson R (1977) A model of insurance markets with incomplete information. J Econ Theory 16:167–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Escuela de EconomíaUniversidad de GuanajuatoGuanajuatoMexico

Personalised recommendations