The findings of Rohner and Frey (Public Choice 133(1–2):129–145, 2007) suggest a positive Granger causality between media attention and terrorist attacks. We replicate and extend the empirical part of their study. Besides more periods which allow the circumventing of any possible far-reaching 9/11 effects, we add data from Fox News and use impulse response functions to analyse the persistence and magnitude of the effects. On the whole, we cannot confirm that there is a robust mutual Granger causal relationship between the media coverage and terrorism.
Media attention Terrorism Conflict Granger causality Impulse response
C32 D74 Z29
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank Michael Murach, Joachim Grosser and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts. In addition, we thank Julian Herwig for his assistance in preparing the data.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Beckmann KB, Dewenter R, Thomas T (2017) Can news draw blood? The impact of media coverage on the number and severity of terror attacks. Peace Econ Peace Sci Public Policy 23(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushion S, Lewis J (2009) Towards a ’foxification’ of 24-hour news channels in Britain? An analysis of market-driven and publicly funded news coverage. Journalism 10(2):131–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DellaVigna S, Kaplan E (2007) The Fox news effect: media bias and voting. Q J Econ 122(3):1187–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders W, Sandler T (2011) The political economy of terrorism. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger CW (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3):424–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar