Advertisement

Unemployment reduction through solo self-employment: A gender question?

  • Tina HaussenEmail author
  • Marcus Schlegel
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

This paper examines at the macro-level whether changes in solo self-employment rates lead to changes in unemployment rates with a special emphasis on the role of the gender of the solo self-employed. This gender-specific perspective on self-employment is important because gender differences are reflected in the individual motivation to become self-employed, the self-selection into differently productive sectors and in the performance of the businesses founded. To empirically approach the research question, macro-level panel data from 23 OECD countries during the period 1991–2015 are used. Since the relationship between solo self-employment and unemployment is likely reciprocal and dynamic, population-weighted vector autoregressive models are estimated and Granger-causality tests are performed. The econometric results indicate that solo self-employment can create positive (indirect) employment effects in the medium to long term, regardless of gender. However, male solo self-employment affects employment growth somewhat faster than does female solo self-employment.

Keywords

Solo self-employment Unemployment Gender VAR 

JEL Classification

J23 J64 L26 L53 M13 O11 J16 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank two anonymous referees and the editor for many helpful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Andersson Joona P, Wadensjö E (2008) A gender perspective on self-employment entry and performance as self-employed. IZA discussion papers 3581, BonnGoogle Scholar
  2. Armington C, Acs ZJ (2002) The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Reg Stud 36(1):33–45Google Scholar
  3. Audretsch DB, Carree MA, Van Stel A, Thurik RA (2002) Impeded industrial restructuring: the growth penalty. KYKLOS 55(1):81–98Google Scholar
  4. Audretsch DB, Dohse D, Niebuhr A (2010) Cultural diversity and entrepreneurship: a regional analysis for Germany. Ann Reg Sci 45(1):55–85Google Scholar
  5. Audretsch DB, Dohse D, Niebuhr A (2015) Regional unemployment structure and new firm formation. Pap Reg Sci 94(S1):115–138Google Scholar
  6. Bögenhold D, Klinglmair A (2015) Women’s self-employment and freelancers: observations on female entrepreneurship. In: Burke A (ed) The handbook of research on freelancing and self-employment. Senate Hall Academic Publishing, Dublin, pp 51–62Google Scholar
  7. Brünjes J, Revilla-Diez J (2013) ‘Recession push’ and ‘prosperity pull’ entrepreneurship in a rural developing context. Entrep Reg Dev 25:251–271Google Scholar
  8. Burke A (2011) The entrepreneurship enabling role of freelancers: theory with evidence from the construction industry. Int Rev Entrep 9(3):1–28Google Scholar
  9. Caliendo M, Künn S (2015) Getting back into the labor market: the effects of start-up subsidies for unemployed females. J Popul Econ 28(4):1005–1043Google Scholar
  10. Caliendo M, Fossen F, Kritikos AS (2014) Personality characteristics and the decisions to become and stay self-employed. Small Bus Econ 42(4):787–814Google Scholar
  11. Caliendo M, Hogenacker J, Künn S, Wießner F (2015) Subsidized start-ups out of unemployment: a comparison to regular business start-ups. Small Bus Econ 45(1):165–190Google Scholar
  12. Carmona M, Congregado E, Golpe AA, Iglesias J (2016) Self-employment and business cycles: searching for asymmetries in a panel of 23 OECD countries. J Bus Econ Manag 17(6):1155–1171Google Scholar
  13. Carree MA, Van Stel A, Thurik RA, Wennekers S (2002) Economic development and business ownership: an analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976–1996. Small Bus Econ 19(3):271–290Google Scholar
  14. Carree MA, Van Stel A, Thurik RA, Wennekers S (2007) The relationship between economic development and business ownership revisited. Entrep Reg Dev 19(3):281–291Google Scholar
  15. Charles M, Bradley K (2009) Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. Am J Sociol 114(4):924–976Google Scholar
  16. Charness G, Gneezy U (2012) Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. J Econ Behav Organ 83(1):50–58Google Scholar
  17. Cima J, Costa J, Pinto C, Pinto T (2017) The dynamics of self-employment and unemployment during the Great Recession. Int Rev Entrep 15(3):361–374Google Scholar
  18. Conroy T, Weiler S (2016) Does gender matter for job creation? Business ownership and employment growth. Small Bus Econ 47(2):397–419Google Scholar
  19. Cowling M, Taylor M (2001) Entrepreneurial women and men: two different species? Small Bus Econ 16(3):167–175Google Scholar
  20. De Vries N, Koster S (2013) Determinants of innovative solo self-employment: a regional approach. In: EIASM, ECSB and ISM: RENT XXVII conference (Research in entrepreneurship and small business), Book of abstracts, Vilnius, p 54Google Scholar
  21. Dennis WJ Jr (2011) Entrepreneurship, small business and public policy levers. J Small Bus Manag 49(1):92–106Google Scholar
  22. Devine TJ (1994) Changes in wage-and-salary returns to skill and the recent rise in female self-employment. Am Econ Rev 84(2):108–113Google Scholar
  23. Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG (2011) Individual risk attitudes: measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J Eur Econ Assoc 9(3):522–550Google Scholar
  24. Doran J, McCarthy N, O’Connor M (2016) Entrepreneurship and employment growth across European regions. Reg Stud 3(1):121–128Google Scholar
  25. EUROSTAT (2019) Self-employed persons by main difficulty as self-employed, sex and professional status [lfso_17sediff]. Visited on 26 Apr 2019Google Scholar
  26. Evans DS, Leighton LS (1990) Small business formation by unemployed and employed workers. Small Bus Econ 2(4):319–330Google Scholar
  27. Fairlie RW, Robb AM (2009) Gender differences in business performance: evidence from the characteristics of business owners survey. Small Bus Econ 33(4):375Google Scholar
  28. Faria JR, Cuestas JC, Mourelle E (2010) Entrepreneurship and unemployment: a nonlinear bidirectional causality? Econ Model 27(5):1282–1291Google Scholar
  29. Fritsch M (2008) How does new business formation affect regional development? Introduction to the special issue. Small Bus Econ 30:1–14Google Scholar
  30. Fritsch M, Falck O (2007) New business formation by industry over space and time: a multidimensional analysis. Reg Stud 41(2):157–172Google Scholar
  31. Fritsch M, Mueller P (2004) Effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Reg Stud 38(8):961–975Google Scholar
  32. Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3):424–438Google Scholar
  33. Guesnier B (1994) Regional variations in new firm formation in France. Reg Stud 28(4):347–358Google Scholar
  34. Gurley-Calvez T, Biehl A, Harper K (2009) Time-use patterns and women entrepreneurs. Am Econ Rev 99(2):139–144Google Scholar
  35. Hauret L, Williams DR (2017) Cross-national analysis of gender differences in job satisfaction. Ind Relat 56(2):203–235Google Scholar
  36. Hurst E, Lusardi A (2004) Liquidity constraints, household wealth, and entrepreneurship. J Polit Econ 112(2):319–347Google Scholar
  37. ILO (2017) Key indicators of the labour market (KILM). http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/ilostat-home/home?_adf.ctrl-state=3ex98qkgw_4&_afrLoop=42094079283967#!. Visited on 27 Dec 2017
  38. Koellinger P, Minniti M, Schade C (2013) Gender differences in entrepreneurial propensity. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 75(2):213–234Google Scholar
  39. Lasch F, Gundolf K, Kraus S (2007) The impact of unemployment on entrepreneurship: empirical evidence from France. Int J Bus Res 7(2):1–8Google Scholar
  40. Lawless M (2014) Age or size? Contributions to job creation. Small Bus Econ 42(4):815–830Google Scholar
  41. Lefebvre P, Merrigan P (2008) Child-care policy and the labor supply of mothers with young children: a natural experiment from Canada. J Labor Econ 26(3):519–548Google Scholar
  42. Leoni T, Falk M (2010) Gender and field of study as determinants of self-employment. Small Bus Econ 34(2):167–185Google Scholar
  43. Marlow S, McAdam M (2013) Advancing debate and challenging myths exploring the alleged case of the under-performing female entrepreneur. Int J Entrep Behav Res 19(1):145–162Google Scholar
  44. OECD (2016) OECD labour force statistics 2015. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  45. Oxenfeldt AR (1943) New firms and free enterprise: pre-war and post-war aspects. American Council on Public Affairs, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  46. Prieger JE, Bampoky C, Blanco LR, Liu A (2016) Economic growth and the optimal level of entrepreneurship. World Dev 82:95–109Google Scholar
  47. Reynolds PD, Miller B, Maki WR (1995) Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: US 1976–88. Small Bus Econ 7(5):389–407Google Scholar
  48. Ritsilä J, Tervo H (2002) Effects of unemployment on new firm formation: micro-level panel data evidence from Finland. Small Bus Econ 19(1):31–40Google Scholar
  49. Robb A (2002) Entrepreneurial performance by women and minorities: the case of new firms. J Dev Entrep 7(4):383–397Google Scholar
  50. Rouse J, Kitching J (2006) Do enterprise support programmes leave women holding the baby? Environ Plan Gov Policy C 24(1):21–36Google Scholar
  51. Santarelli E, Carree M, Verheul I (2009) Unemployment and firm entry and exit: an update on a controversial relationship. Reg Stud 43(8):1061–1073Google Scholar
  52. Shane SA (2009) Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Bus Econ 33(2):141–149Google Scholar
  53. Simoes N, Crespo N, Moreira SB (2016) Individual determinants of self-employment entry: what do we really know? J Econ Surv 30(4):783–806Google Scholar
  54. Sorgner A, Fritsch M, Kritikos A (2017) Do entrepreneurs really earn less? Small Bus Econ 49(2):251–272Google Scholar
  55. Storey DJ (1991) The birth of new firms: does unemployment matter? A review of the evidence. Small Bus Econ 3(3):167–178Google Scholar
  56. Thompson P, Jones-Evans D, Kwong C (2009) Women and home-based entrepreneurship: evidence from the United Kingdom. Int Small Bus J Res Entrep 27(2):227–239Google Scholar
  57. Thurik A, Carree MA, Van Stel A, Audretsch DB (2008) Does self-employment reduce unemployment? J Bus Ventur 23(6):673–686Google Scholar
  58. Van Stel A (2005) COMPENDIA: harmonizing business ownership data across countries and over time. Int Entrep Manag J 1(1):105–123Google Scholar
  59. Van Stel A, De Vries N (2015) The economic value of different types of solo self-employed: a review. In: Burke A (ed) The handbook of research on freelancing and self-employment. Senate Hall Academic Publishing, Dublin, pp 77–84Google Scholar
  60. Van Stel A, Carree MA, Thurik RA (2005) The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Bus Econ 24(3):311–321Google Scholar
  61. Van Stel A, Wennekers S, Scholman G (2014) Solo self-employed versus employer entrepreneurs: determinants and macro-economic effects in OECD countries. Eur Bus Rev 4:107–136Google Scholar
  62. Vejsiu A (2011) Incentives to self-employment decision in Sweden. Int Rev Appl Econ 25:379–403Google Scholar
  63. Verheul I (2018) Commitment or control? HRM practices in female and male-led small businesses. Int Rev Entrep 16(3):329–354Google Scholar
  64. Verheul I, Thurik RA, Grilo I, van der Zwan P (2012) Explaining preferences and actual involvement in self-employment: gender and the entrepreneurial personality. J Econ Psychol 33(2):325–341Google Scholar
  65. Wagner J (2007) What a difference a Y makes-female and male nascent entrepreneurs in Germany. Small Bus Econ 28(1):1–21Google Scholar
  66. Wellington AJ (2006) Self-employment: the new solution for balancing family and career? Labour Econ 13(3):357–386Google Scholar
  67. Williams DR (2012) Gender discrimination and self-employment dynamics in Europe. J Socio Econ 41(2):153–158Google Scholar
  68. World Bank (2017) World development indicators. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators. Visited on 27 Dec 2017

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of JenaJenaGermany
  2. 2.University of ErfurtErfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations