Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 57, Issue 6, pp 2043–2078 | Cite as

Decomposition methods for analyzing inequality changes in Latin America 2002–2014

  • John ArizaEmail author
  • Gabriel Montes-Rojas
Article
  • 118 Downloads

Abstract

This paper studies recent inequality patterns and the distributional effects of schooling and job informality on wage inequality in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Mexico during the 2002–2014 period. By means of a quantile regression framework, we decompose changes in the wage gap using several techniques including the Machado and Mata algorithm, the RIF regression unconditional quantile regression method and the random-coefficients quantile regression representation. Results show that the reduction in wage inequality is explained by the improvements in the lower part of the wage distribution in which the pricing rather than the composition effect explains most of the changes. We found that the composition effect of education was unequalizing, while their pricing effect was inequality reducing. Job formality favored relatively more workers in the lower part of the distribution and had an important pricing effect below the median for all countries, but only in the 2002–2008 period.

Keywords

Wage structure Quantile regressions Education Inequality Informality Latin America 

JEL Classification:

J31 C21 I24 J46 O54 

References

  1. Amarante V, Arim R (2015) Desigualdad e informalidad: un anlaisis de cinco experiencias latinoamericanas. CEPALGoogle Scholar
  2. David H, Katz LS, Kearney MS (2005) Rising wage inequality: the role of composition and prices. In: NBER Working Paper 11628Google Scholar
  3. Barro R, Lee J (2013) A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. J Dev Econ 104:184–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beccaria L, Maurizio R, Vázquez G (2015) Recent decline in wage inequality and formalization of the labour market in Argentina. Int Rev Appl Econ 29(5):677–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belser P, Rani U (2015) Minimum wages and inequality. In: Berg J (ed) Labour markets, institutions and inequality: building just societies in the 21st Century. Edward Elgar Publishing, Chelthenham, UK, International Labour Office, pp 123–146Google Scholar
  6. Berg J (2010) Laws or luck? Understanding rising formality in Brazil in the 2000s. In: Lee S, McCann D (eds) Regulating for decent work: new directions in labour market regulation pp 123–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Binelli C (2016) Wage inequality and informality: evidence from Mexico. IZA J Labor Dev 5(5):5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blinder A (1973) Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. J Hum Resour 8(4):436–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bosch M, Manacorda M (2010) Minimum wages and earnings inequality in urban Mexico. Am Econ J Appl Econ 2(4):128–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourguignon F, Ferreira F, Lustig N (2005) The microeconomics of income distribution dynamics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornia GA (2014) Inequality trends and their determinants: Latin America over the period 1990–2010. In: Cornia GA (ed) Falling inequality in Latin America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 23–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Esquivel G, Lustig N, Scott J (2010) Mexico: a decade of falling inequality: market forces or state action? In: López-Calva L, Lustig N (ed) Declining inequality in Latin America. A decade of progress, pp 175–217. BROOKINGS-UNDPGoogle Scholar
  13. Fabris J, Montes-Rojas G (2014) Estudio de los determinantes de los cambios en la distribución del ingreso en Argentina en las últimas dos décadas. Un análisis basado en la metodología de descomposiciones. XLIX Reunión Anual - Asociación Argentina de Economía PolíticaGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferreira F, Firpo S, Messina J (2016a) Understanding recent dynamics of earnings inequality in Brazil. In: Schneider BR (ed) New order and progress: development and democracy in Brazil, pp 187–211. Oxford Scholarship OnlineCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferreira FHG, Firpo S, Messina J (2016b) Ageing poorly? Accounting for the decline in earnings inequality in Brazil 1995–2012. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 8018Google Scholar
  16. Firpo S, Fortin N, Lemieux T (2009) Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica 77(3):953–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fortin N, Lemieux T, Firpo S (2011) Decomposition methods in economics. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of Labor Economics, vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  18. Gasparini L, Lustig N (2011) The rise and fall of income inequality in Latin America. In: The Oxford Handbook of Latin American Economics. Oxford Handbooks in Economics, pp 691–714Google Scholar
  19. Hayter S (2015) Unions and collective bargaining. In: Berg J (ed) Labour Markets, Institutions and Inequality: Building Just Societies in the 21st Century. Edward Elgar Publishing, Chelthenham, UK, International Labour Office, pp 95–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ILO (2011) La formalizacion del empleo en Argentina. Notas OIT-Trabajo decente en ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  21. Koenker R (2005) Quantile regression. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koenker R, Xiao Z (2006) Quantile autoregression. J Am Stat Assoc 101:980–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Legovini A, Bouillón C, Lustig N (2005) Race and gender in the labor market. In: Bourguignon F, Ferreira F, Lustig N (eds) The microeconomics of income distribution dynamics, chapter 8. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 275–312Google Scholar
  24. Lustig N, López-Calva L, Ortiz-Juárez E (2013) Declining inequaltity in Latin America in the 2000s: the cases of Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. World Dev 44:129–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Machado JAF, Mata J (2005) Counterfactual decomposition of changes in wage distributions using quantile regression. J Appl Econ 20:445–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maurizio R (2012) Labor informality in Latin America: the case of Argentina, Chile, Brazil and Peru. Brooks World Poverty Institute Working Paper 165Google Scholar
  27. Maurizio R (2014) Labour formalization and declining inequality in Argentina and Brazil in 2000s: a dynamic approach. ILO Research Paper 9Google Scholar
  28. Maurizio R, Vázquez G (2016) Distribution effects of the minimum wage in four Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay. Int Labour Rev 155(1):97–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Melly B (2005) Decomposition of differences in distribution using quantile regression. Labour Econ 12(4):577–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Messina J, Silva J (2018) Wage inequality in Latin America: understanding the past to prepare for the future. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  31. Montes-Rojas G, Siga L, Mainali R (2017) Mean and quantile regression Oaxaca-Blinder decompositions with an application to caste discrimination. J Econ Inequal 15:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neumark D, Cunningham W, Siga L (2006) The effects of the minimum wage in Brazil on the distribution of family incomes: 1996–2001. J Dev Econ 80(1):136–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oaxaca RL (1973) Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Int Econ Rev 14(3):693–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oaxaca RL, Ransom MR (1994) On discrimination and the decomposition of the wage differentials. J Econom 61:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. SEDLAC (2016) Socio-Economic Database for Latin America and the Caribbean (CEDLAS and the World Bank). http://sedlac.econo.unlp.edu.ar/eng/
  36. Wang Y, Lustig N, Bartalotti O (2016) Decomposing changes in male wage distribution in Brazil. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 49–78Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Economía y FinanzasUniversidad del TolimaIbaguéColombia
  2. 2.Departament d’Economia AplicadaUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations