Advertisement

Social relationships, public media, and pro-environmental behaviors

  • 398 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

We explore the heterogeneity of pro-environmental behaviors embedded in social contexts from the perspectives of both social relationships and public media. Using new data from a Chinese nationally representative sample, we employ latent cluster models to identify patterns in social relationships and public media. Then we examine how differences across patterns of social relationships and public media correlate with differences in the likelihood that people take pro-environmental actions. Our results show that individuals with more exposure to green social contexts are more likely to take pro-environmental actions and, in particular, that public media plays a more important role than social relationships. The finding implies that developing countries can use public media to promote public participation in environmental protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Old Summer Palace Hearing was held by the Chinese National Environmental Protection Administration (NEPA) to address the bottom anti-seepage project for the Old Summer Palace in Beijing on April 13, 2005. It was China’s first environmental hearing and is viewed as the start of public participation in environmental protection in China. The Amendment of the Environmental Protection Law stipulated the principle of public participation in January, 2005; and the No. 35 NEPA Decree published in July aimed to better facilitate public participation in environmental protection.

References

  1. Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J (eds) Action control. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 11–39

  2. Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Econ J 100(401):464–477

  3. Blok V, Wesselink R, Studynka O, Kemp R (2015) Encouraging sustainability in the workplace: a survey on the pro-environmental behavior of university employees. J Clean Prod 106:55–67

  4. Brekke KA, Kverndokk S, Nyborg K (2003) An economic model of moral motivation. J Public Econ 87(9–10):1967–1983

  5. Chan K (1998) Mass communication and pro-environmental behaviour: waste recycling in Hong Kong. J Environ Manag 52(4):317–325

  6. Clark CF, Kotchen MJ, Moore MR (2003) Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: participation in a green electricity program. J Environ Psychol 23(3):237–246

  7. Conrad K (2005) Price competition and product differentiation when consumers care for the environment. Environ Resour Econ 31(1):1–19

  8. Hines JM, Hungerford HR, Tomera AN (1987) Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. J Environ Educ 18(2):1–8

  9. Hopper JR, Nielsen JM (1991) Recycling as altruistic behavior: normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environ Behav 23(2):195–220

  10. Kandel E, Lazear EP (1992) Peer pressure and partnerships. J Polit Econ 100(4):801–817

  11. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8(3):239–260

  12. Konar S, Cohen MA (1997) Information as regulation: the effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions. J Environ Econ Manag 32(1):109–124

  13. Kotchen MJ, Moore M (2007) Private provision of environmental public goods: household participation in green-electricity programs. J Environ Econ Manag 53(1):1–16

  14. Liu X, Anbumozhi V (2009) Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: an empirical study of Chinese listed companies. J Clean Prod 17(6):593–600

  15. Liu X, Liu B, Shishime T, Yu Q, Bi J, Fujitsuka T (2010) An empirical study on the driving mechanism of proactive corporate environmental management in China. J Environ Manag 91(8):1707–1717

  16. Meyer A (2016) Heterogeneity in the preferences and pro-environmental behavior of college students: the effects of years on campus, demographics, and external factors. J Clean Prod 112(4):3451–3463

  17. Miller E, Buys L (2006) The impact of social capital on residential water-affecting behaviors in a drought-prone Australian community. Soc Nat Resour 21(3):244–257

  18. Mir DF, Feitelson E (2007) Factors affecting environmental behavior in micro-enterprises laundry and motor vehicle repair firms in Jerusalem. Int Small Bus J 25(4):383–415

  19. Olli E, Grendstad G, Wollebaek D (2001) Correlates of environmental behaviors: bringing back social context. Environ Behav 33(2):181–208

  20. Owen AL, Videras J (2009) Reconsidering social capital: a latent class approach. Empir Econ 37(3):555–582

  21. Poortinga W, Steg L, Vlek C (2004) Value, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: a study into household energy use. Environ Behav 36(1):70–93

  22. Rice G (2006) Pro-environmental behavior in Egypt: is there a role for Islamic environmental Ethics? J Bus Ethics 65(4):373–390

  23. Rodruguez-Barreiro LM, Fernandez-Manzanal R, Serra LM, Carrasquer J, Murillo MB, Morales MJ, Calvo JM, del Valle J (2013) Approach to a causal model between attitudes and environmental behavior: a graduate case study. J Clean Prod 48:116–125

  24. Smith VH, Kehoe MR, Cremer ME (1995) The private provision of public goods: altruism and voluntary giving. J Public Econ 58(1):107–126

  25. Turaga RMR, Howarth RB, Borsuk ME (2010) Pro-environmental behavior: rational choice meets moral motivation. Ann NY Acad Sci 1185(1):211–224

  26. Vicente-Molina MA, Fernández-Sáinz A, Izagirre-Olaizola J (2013) Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behavior: comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries. J Clean Prod 61:130–138

  27. Videras J, Owen AL, Conover E, Wu S (2012) The influence of social relationships on pro-environmental behaviors. J Environ Econ Manag 63(1):35–50

  28. Wang F (2008) An empirical study on influence factors of public environmental protection participation. Chin J Popul Resour Environ 18(6):30–35

  29. Welsch H, Kühling J (2009) Determinants of pro-environmental consumption: the role of reference groups and routine behavior. Ecol Econ 69(1):166–176

  30. Welsch H, Kühling J (2016) Green status seeking and endogenous reference standards. Environ Econ Policy Stud 4(18):625–643

  31. Zhang B, Bi J, Yuan Z, Ge J, Liu B, Bu M (2008) Why do firms engage in environmental management: an empirical study in China. J Clean Prod 16(10):1036–1045

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the very helpful comments and suggestions given by two anonymous referees. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers: 71322305, 71774107, 71632007, 71690241, 71421002).

Author information

Correspondence to Haitao Yin.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 10 and 11.

Table 10 Indicator of social relationship (N = 11,161)
Table 11 Indicator of public media (N = 11,161)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, H., Yin, H., Yuan, F. et al. Social relationships, public media, and pro-environmental behaviors. Empir Econ 57, 569–588 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1499-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pro-environmental behaviors
  • Social context
  • Social relationships
  • Public media
  • Latent cluster models

JEL Classification

  • D19
  • Q59