Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 56, Issue 5, pp 1729–1768 | Cite as

School district consolidation policies: endogenous cost inefficiency and saving reversals

  • Mustafa U. KarakaplanEmail author
  • Levent Kutlu
Article

Abstract

Some education policy studies suggest that consolidation of public school districts saves resources. However, endogeneity in cost models would result in incorrect estimates of the effects of consolidation. We use a new stochastic frontier methodology to examine district expenditures while handling endogeneity. Using the data from California, we find that the effects of student achievement and education market concentration on expenditure per pupil are substantially larger when endogeneity is handled. Our findings are robust to concerns such as instrumental variable adequacy and spatial interactions. Our consolidation simulations indicate that failure to address endogeneity can result in unrealistic expectations of savings.

Keywords

Educational finance Expenditures Costs Consolidation Economies of scale Efficiency Endogeneity 

JEL Classification

I22 I28 I21 H72 H75 L38 

References

  1. Adetutu M, Glass AJ, Kenjegalieva K, Sickles RC (2014) The effects of efficiency and TFP growth on pollution in Europe: a multistage spatial analysis. J Prod Anal 43:307–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aigner DJ, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econom 6:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amsler C, Prokhorov A, Schmidt P (2016) Endogenous stochastic frontier models. J Econom 190:280–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amsler C, Prokhorov A, Schmidt P (2017) Endogenous environmental variables in stochastic frontier models. J Econom. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/16763
  5. Andrews M, Duncombe W, Yinger J (2002) Revisiting economies of size in American education: Are we any closer to a consensus? Econ Educ Rev 21:245–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belfield CR, Levin HM (2002) The effects of competition between schools on educational outcomes: a review for the United States. Rev Educ Res 72:279–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borland MV, Howsen RM (1992) Student academic achievement and the degree of market concentration in education. Econ Educ Rev 11:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornwell C, Schmidt P, Sickles RC (1990) Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variation in efficiency levels. J Econom 46:185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costrell R, Hanushek E, Loeb S (2008) What do cost functions tell us about the cost of an adequate education? Peabody J Educ 83:198–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dodson ME III, Garrett TA (2004) Inefficient education spending in public school districts: A case for consolidation? Contemp Econ Policy 22:270–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Druska V, Horrace WC (2004) Generalized moments estimation for spatial panel data: Indonesian rice farming. Am J Agric Econ 86:185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duncombe W, Miner J, Ruggiero J (1995) Potential cost savings from school district consolidation: a case study of New York. Econ Educ Rev 14:265–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duncombe W, Yinger J (2007) Does school district consolidation cut costs? Educ Finance Policy 2:341–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duncombe W, Yinger J (2011) Making do: state constraints and local responses in California’s education finance system. Int Tax Public Finance 18:337–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duygun M, Kutlu L, Sickles RC (2016) Measuring productivity and efficiency: a Kalman filter approach. J Prod Anal 46:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitzpatrick MD, Grissmer D, Hastedt S (2011) What a difference a day makes: estimating daily learning gains during kindergarten and first grade using a natural experiment. Econ Educ Rev 30:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS (2008) The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glass A, Kenjegalieva K, Paez-Farrell J (2013a) Productivity growth decomposition using a spatial autoregressive frontier model. Econ Lett 119:291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glass A, Kenjegalieva K, Sickles RC (2013b) A spatial autoregressive production frontier model for panel data: with an application to european countries. Available at SSRN 2227720Google Scholar
  20. Greene W (2005a) Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models. J Prod Anal 23:7–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greene W (2005b) Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. J Econom 126:269–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greene WH (1980a) Maximum likelihood estimation of econometric frontier functions. J Econom 3:27–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greene WH (1980b) On the estimation of a flexible frontier production model. J Econom 13:101–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greene WH (2003) Simulated likelihood estimation of the normal-gamma stochastic frontier function. J Prod Anal 19:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gronberg TJ, Jansen DW, Karakaplan MU, Taylor LL (2015) School district consolidation: market concentration and the scale-efficiency tradeoff. S Econ J 82:580–597Google Scholar
  26. Gronberg TJ, Jansen DW, Taylor LL (2011a) The adequacy of educational cost functions: lessons from Texas. Peabody J Educ 86:3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gronberg TJ, Jansen DW, Taylor LL (2011b) The impact of facilities on the cost of education. Natl Tax J 64:193–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gronberg TJ, Jansen DW, Taylor LL (2012) The relative efficiency of charter schools: a cost frontier approach. Econ Educ Rev 31:302–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grosskopf S, Hayes KJ, Taylor LL (2009) The relative efficiency of charter schools. Ann Public Coop Econ 80:67–87.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2008.00381.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grosskopf S, Hayes KJ, Taylor LL, Weber WL (2001) On the determinants of school district efficiency: competition and monitoring. J Urban Econ 49:453–478.  https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.2000.2201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guan Z, Kumbhakar SC, Myers RJ, Lansink AO (2009) Measuring excess capital capacity in agricultural production. Am J Agric Econ 91:765–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hanushek EA (2005) The alchemy of ‘costing out’ an adequate education. In: Conference on Adequacy Lawsuits, 2005Google Scholar
  33. Hanushek EA (2006) Science violated: spending projections and the ‘costing out’ of an adequate education. Hoover Press, Courting Failure, pp 257–308Google Scholar
  34. Hobbs V (2004) The promise and the power of distance learning in rural education. Policy brief. Rural School and Community Trust, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoxby CM (2000) Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? Am Econ Rev 90:1209–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoxby CM (2003) School choice and school productivity: Could school choice be a tide that lifts all boats?. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Imazeki J, Reschovsky A (2004) Is no child left behind an un (or under) funded federal mandate? Evidence from Texas. Natl Tax J 57:571–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Izadi H, Johnes G, Oskrochi R, Crouchley R (2002) Stochastic frontier estimation of a CES cost function: the case of higher education in Britain. Econ Educ Rev 21:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jondrow J, Lovell CAK, Materov IS, Schmidt P (1982) On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. J Econom 19:233–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Karakaplan MU (2017) Fitting endogenous stochastic frontier models in Stata. Stata J 17:39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Karakaplan MU, Kutlu L (2017) Handling endogeneity in stochastic frontier analysis. Econ Bull 37:889–891Google Scholar
  42. Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (1999) A generalized moments estimator for the autoregressive parameter in a spatial model. Int Econ Rev 40:509–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kumbhakar SC, Lovell CK (2003) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Kutlu L (2010) Battese–Coelli estimator with endogenous regressors. Econ Lett 109:79–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kutlu L (2017) A constrained state space approach for estimating firm efficiency. Econ Lett 152:54–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kutlu L, Tran KC, Tsionas MG (2017) A time-varying true individual effects model with endogenous regressors.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2721864
  47. Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev Econ Stud 70:317–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lewbel A (2012) Using heteroscedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models. J Bus Econ Stat 30:67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marcotte DE, Hemelt SW (2008) Unscheduled school closings and student performance. Educ Finance Policy 3:316–338.  https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.2008.3.3.316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meeusen W, van den Broeck J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production function with composed errors. Int Econ Rev 18:435–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Millimet DL, Collier T (2008) Efficiency in public schools: Does competition matter? J Econom 145:134–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mutter RL, Greene WH, Spector W, Rosko MD, Mukamel DB (2013) Investigating the impact of endogeneity on inefficiency estimates in the application of stochastic frontier analysis to nursing homes. J Prod Anal 39:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. O’Donnell CJ, Coelli TJ (2005) A bayesian approach to imposing curvature on distance functions. J Econom 126:493–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rothstein J (2007) Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? Comment Am Econ Rev 97:2026–2037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schmidt P, Sickles RC (1984) Production frontiers and panel data. J Bus Econ Stat 2:367–374Google Scholar
  56. Shee A, Stefanou SE (2014) Endogeneity corrected stochastic production frontier and technical efficiency. Am J Agric Econ aau083Google Scholar
  57. Stevenson R (1980) Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier functions. J Econom 13:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Taylor LL, Fowler Jr WJ (2006) A comparable wage approach to geographic cost adjustment. Research and development report. NCES-2006-321. National Center for Education StatisticsGoogle Scholar
  59. Timar T (2006) Financing k-12 education in California. A system overview. Unpublished Manuscript, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  60. Tran KC, Tsionas EG (2013) GMM estimation of stochastic frontier model with endogenous regressors. Econ Lett 118:233–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tran KC, Tsionas EG (2015) Endogeneity in stochastic frontier models: Copula approach without external instruments. Econ Lett 133:85–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wang H-J, Schmidt P (2002) One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels. J Prod Anal 18:129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wong KK et al (2014) Why is school closed today? Unplanned k-12 school closures in the United States, 2011–2013. PLoS ONE 9:e113755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zanzig BR (1997) Measuring the impact of competition in local government education markets on the cognitive achievement of students. Econ Educ Rev 16:431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zimmer T, DeBoer L, Hirth M (2009) Examining economies of scale in school consolidation: assessment of Indiana School Districts. J Educ Finance 35:103–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.School of EconomicsGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations