Abstract
The aim of this paper is to determine whether the propagation and transmission mechanism of Malaysian monetary policy differed during the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997/1998 and the Global Financial Crisis of 2007/2008. The methodology employs a time-varying vector autoregression framework. The primary result is that despite having no evidence of time-variation within the propagation mechanism of Malaysian monetary policy the average contribution of a monetary policy shock to the variability of each macroeconomic variable: real GDP, inflation and the nominal effective exchange rate, differs between the two crises. This finding suggests that despite the propagation mechanism being relatively constant, Malaysia’s monetary policy transmission mechanism evolves over time. We believe that the main mechanism driving this evolution is the time-variation in the variance–covariance matrix of the shocks of the model, not the coefficients. We also find some evidence that the implementation of capital controls reduced the influenceability of monetary policy on the Malaysian economy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We also computed the DIC measure for a VAR-SV with a Minnesota (or non-informative) prior for the fixed coefficients. We found that the DIC measure (\(\text{ DIC }=864.42\) and \(p_{D}=61.07\)) to be very similar to the VAR-SV reported in Table 2.
References
Alonso-Carrera J, Kam T (2015) Anatomizing incomplete-markets small open economies: policy trade-offs and equilibrium determinacy. Macroecon Dyn 20:1022–1050
Athanasopoulos G, Raghavan M, Silvapulle P (2012) Structural VAR models for Malaysian monetary policy analysis during the pre- and post-1997 Asian crisis periods. Appl Econ 44(29):3841–3856
Athukorala PC (2010) Malaysian economy in three crises. Departmental working papers 2010–2012, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics
Athukorala PC, Jongwanich J (2012) How effective are capital controls? Evidence from Malaysia. Asian Dev Rev 29(2):1–47
Baumeister C, Peersman G (2013) Time-varying effects of oil supply shocks on the US economy. Am Econ J Macroecon Am Econ Assoc 5(4):1–28
Benati L (2008) The great moderation in the United Kingdom. J Money Credit Bank 40(1):121–147
Benati L, Mumtaz H (2007) U.S. evolving macroeconomic dynamics: a structural investigation. Working paper series 0746, European Central Bank
Bernanke BS, Mihov I (1998) Measuring monetary policy. Q J Econ 113(3):869–902
Canova F, De Nicolo G (2002) Monetary disturbances matter for business fluctuations in the G-7. J Monet Econ 49:1131–1159
Canova F, Gambetti L (2009) Structural changes in the US economy: is there a role for monetary policy? J Econ Dyn Control 33:477–490
Chan J, Eisenstat E (2016) Chan J, Eisenstat E (2016) Bayesian model comparison for time-varying parameter VARs with stochastic volatility. ANU working paper
Chan J, Jeliazkov I (2009) Efficient simulation and integrated likelihood estimation in state space models. Int J Math Model Numer Optim 1:101–120
Chan J, Hsiao C (2014) Estimation of stochastic volatility models with heavy tails and serial dependence. In: Jeliazkov I, Yang X-S (eds) Bayesian inference in the social sciences. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 159–180
Christiano LJ, Eichenbaum M, Evans C (1999) Monetary policy shocks: What have we learned and to what end? In: Woodford M, Taylor J (eds) Handbook of macroeconomics, vol 1. Elsevier Science, New York, pp 65–148
Cross J, Poon A (2016) Forecasting structural change and fat-tailed events in Australian macroeconomic variables. Econ Model 58:34–51
D’Agostino A, Gambetti L, Giannone D (2013) Macroeconomic forecasting and structural change. J Appl Econ 28(1):82–101
Domac I (1999) The distributional consequences of monetary policy: evidence from Malaysia. World bank policy research working papers
Ellis C, Mumtaz H, Zabczyk P (2014) What lies beneath? A time-varying FAVAR model for the UK transmission mechanism. Econ J 124(576):668–699
Faust J (1998) The robustness of identified VAR conclusions about money. Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy, vol 49, pp 207–244
Franta M, Horvath R, Rusnak M (2014) Evaluating changes in the monetary transmission mechanism in the Czech Republic. Empir Econ 46(3):827–842
Fung SC (2002) A VAR analysis of the effects of monetary policy in East Asia. Working paper, Bank of international settlement
Geweke J (1992) Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. In: Bernardo JM, Berger J, Dawid AP, Smith AFM (eds) Bayesian statistics 4. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 169–193
Hanson M (2004) The “Price Puzzle” reconsidered. J Monet Econ 51:1385–1413
Ibrahim H (2005) Sectoral effects of monetary policy: evidence from Malaysia. Asian Econ J 19(1):83–102
Ito H, Chinn M (2016) Notes on the calculation of the Chinn-Ito financial openness variable. http://web.pdx.edu/~ito/Readme_kaopen2014.pdf
Ito T, Sato K (2008) Exchange rate changes and inflation in post-crisis Asian economies: vector autoregression analysis of the exchange rate pass-through. J Money Credit Bank 40(7):1407–1438
Johnston B, Tamirisa NT (1998) Why do countries use capital controls? IMF working paper no. 98/181, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC
Koop G, Korobilis D (2010) Bayesian multivariate time series methods for empirical macroeconomics. Now Publishers Inc, Breda
Koop G, Leon-Gonzalez R, Strachan RW (2009) On the evolution of the monetary policy transmission mechanism. J Econ Dyn Control 33(4):997–1017
Koop G, Pesaran MH, Potter SM (1996) Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. J Econ 74:119–147
Mumtaz H, Sunder-Plassmann L (2013) Time-varying dynamics of the real exchange rate: an empirical analysis. J Appl Econ 28(3):498–525
Nakajima J, Kasuya M, Watanabe T (2011) Bayesian analysis of time-varying parameter vector autoregressive model for the Japanese economy and monetary policy. J Jpn Int Econ 25(3):225–245
Pitt MK, Shephard N (1999) Filtering via simulation: auxiliary particle filter. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):590–599
Primiceri G (2005) Time varying structural vector autoregressions and monetary policy. Rev Econ Stud 72:821–852
Raghavan M, Silvapulle P (2008) Structural VAR approach to Malaysian monetary policy framework: evidence from the pre- and post-Asian crisis periods. New Zealand Association of Economics, NZAE conference 2008, paper no. 30.1, pp 1–32
Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc B 64(4):583–639
Tang HC (2006) The relative importance of monetary policy transmission channels in Malaysia. Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis Working Paper Series, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University
Uhlig H (2005) What are the effects of monetary policy on output? Results from an agnostic identification procedure. J Monet Econ 52:381–419
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge financial support by The Economic Society of Australia via the 2015 Peter Kenyon Memorial Postgraduate Scholarship. I would like to thank especially my supervisors Joshua C.C. Chan and Timothy Kam, and my fellow Ph.D. classmate Jamie Cross for helpful comments on the paper. Also, I would like to thank two anonymous referees comments, which helped improved the paper significantly. Lastly, I would like to thank Marylu Nelson for help in editing the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poon, A. The transmission mechanism of Malaysian monetary policy: a time-varying vector autoregression approach. Empir Econ 55, 417–444 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1280-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1280-z