Empirical Economics

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 959–973 | Cite as

Can school competition improve standards? The case of faith schools in England

Article

Abstract

This paper measures the extent to which the presence of state-funded Catholic secondary schools in England alters the educational experiences of pupils who attend neighbouring schools, whether through school effort induced by competition or changes in peer groups induced by sorting. National administrative data are used to estimate pupil test score growth models between the ages of 11 and 16, with instrumental variable methods employed to avoid confounding the direct causal effect of Catholic schools. The historical Catholic population, holding constant the current Catholic population, is used to predict current Catholic school supply. We find little evidence that competition from Catholic schools raises area-wide pupil attainment.

Keywords

School competition Religious schooling School quality 

JEL Classification

H11 I21 I28 

References

  1. Allen R (2007) Allocating pupils to their nearest secondary school: the consequences for social and ability stratification. Urban Stud 44(4):751–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen R, West A (2009) Religious schools in London: school admissions, religious composition and selectivity. Oxf Rev Educ 35(4):471–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen R, West A (2011) Why do faith secondary schools have advantaged intakes? The relative importance of neighbourhood characteristics, social background and religious identification amongst parents. Br Educ Res J 37(4):691–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altonji JG, Elder T, Taber C (2005) Selection on observed and unobserved variables: assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools. J Polit Econ 113(1):151–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley S, Johnes G, Millington J (2001) The effect of competition on the efficiency of secondary schools in England. Eur J Oper Res 135(3):545–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley S, Taylor J (2009) Diversity, choice and the quasi-market: an empirical analysis of secondary education policy in England. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 72(1):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brierley P (2006) Religious trends 6: pulling out of the nosedive. Christian Research, SwindonGoogle Scholar
  8. Burgess S, Slater H (2006) Using boundary changes to estimate the impact of school competition on test scores. CMPO Working paper, 158Google Scholar
  9. Card D, Dooley M, Payne AA (2010) School competition and efficiency with publicly funded Catholic schools. Am Econ J Appl Econ 2(4):150–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark D (2009) The performance and competitive effects of school autonomy. J Polit Econ 117(4):745–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen-Zada D (2009) An alternative instrument for private school competition. Econ Educ Rev 28(1):29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibbons S, Machin S, Silva O (2008a) Competition, choice and pupil achievement. J Eur Econ Assoc 6(4):912–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibbons S, Silva O, Wilson J (2008b) Urban density and pupil attainment. J Urban Econ 63(2):631–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoxby C (1994) Do private schools provide competition for public schools? NBER Working Paper, 4978Google Scholar
  15. Jepsen C (2002) The role of aggregation in estimating the effects of private school competition on student achievement. J Urban Econ 52(3):477–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Webber R, Butler T (2007) Classifying pupils by where they live: how well does this predict variation in their GCSE results? Urban Stud 44(7):1229–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. West A, Hind A, Pennell H (2004) School admissions and ‘selection’ in comprehensive schools: policy and practice. Oxf Rev Educ 30(3):347–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. West M, Woessman L (2010) “Every Catholic child in a Catholic school”: historical resistance to state schooling, contemporary private competition, and student achievement across countries. Econ J 120(546):F229–F255CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Quantitative Social SciencesUCL Institute of EducationLondonUK
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations