Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 463–501 | Cite as

Further developments in the dynamics of female labour force participation

  • Yolanda Pena-Boquete
Article

Abstract

Papers attempting to explain female labour force participation either do not include women-specific variables or lack a proper dynamic specification. In this paper, we estimate a dynamic equation for female labour force participation in OECD countries from 1980 to 2007, taking into account several sets of variables. Moreover, we use our model to predict the results for 2007–2011, and we find that our model adjusts quite well to the actual data even with regard to the out-sample observations during the ongoing recession. In order to gain further insight concerning the interpretation and robustness of the equation, it is then compared to a similar equation for males. Our results show that real wage is one of the most relevant variables for female participation. Thus our specification could also be useful to endogenise labour force participation for a macro-labour market framework such as that of Layard et al. (1991, rev. 2005). However, women’s preferences, the overall level of education, and other structural factors are also important.

Keywords

Labour force participation Gender GMM 

JEL Classification

J13 J21 J82 

References

  1. Anderson TW, Hsiao C (1982) Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. J Econom 18(1):47–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andolfatto D (1996) Business cycles and labor-market search. Am Econ Rev 86(1):112–132Google Scholar
  3. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom 68(1):29–51. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashenfelter O (1972) Racial discrimination and trade unionism. J Polit Econ 80(3):435–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barro RJ, Lee J-W (2001) International data on educational attainment: updates and implications. Oxf Econ Pap 53(3):541–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bassanini A, Duval R (2006) The determinants of unemployment across oecd countries: reassessing the role of policies and institutions. OECD Econ Stud 42(1):7Google Scholar
  8. Bassanini A, Duval R (2009) Unemployment, institutions, and reform complementarities: re-assessing the aggregate evidence for oecd countries. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 25(1):40–59. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grp004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker Gary S (1957) The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertola G, Blau FD, Kahn LM (2007) Labor market institutions and demographic employment patterns. J Popul Econ 20(4):833–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blanchard O, Wolfers J (2000) The role of shocks and institutions in the rise of european unemployment: the aggregate evidence. Econ J 110(462):1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87(1):115–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blundell R, Bond S, Windmeijer F (2001) Estimation in dynamic panel data models: improving on the performance of the standard GMM estimator. In: Baltagi BH, Fomby TB, Hill RC (eds) Advances in Econometrics: Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels, vol 15. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, U. K, pp 53–91Google Scholar
  14. Bond S, Hoeffler A, Temple J (2001) Gmm estimation of empirical growth models. Economics Papers 2001-W21, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Boskin MJ, Sheshinski E (1983) Optimal tax treatment of the family: married couples. J Public Econ 20(3):281–297. doi: 10.1016/0047-2727(83)90027-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cain GG (1966) Married women in the labor force. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  17. Cain GG, Dooley MD (1976) Estimation of a model of labor supply, fertility, and wages of married women. J Polit Econ 84(4):S179–S199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cain GG, Mincer J (1969) Urban poverty and labor force participation: comment. Am Econ Rev 59(1):185–194Google Scholar
  19. Clark KB, Summers LH (1982) Labour force participation: timing and persistence. Rev Econ Stud 49(5):825–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Destefanis S, Mastromatteo G (2012) Assessing the reassessment: a panel analysis of the lisbon strategy. Econ Lett 115(2):148–151. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eckstein Z, Lifshitz O (2011) Dynamic female labor supply. Econometrica 79(6):1675–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eckstein Z, Wolpin KI (1989) Dynamic labour force participation of married women and endogenous work experience. Rev Econ Stud 56(3):375–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Francesconi M (2002) A joint dynamic model of fertility and work of married women. J Labor Econ 20(2):336–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Friedman M (1962) Price theory: a provisional text. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  25. Gauthier AH, Bortnik A (2001) Comparative maternity, parental, and childcare database, version 2. University of Calgary, Calgary, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  26. Genre V, Gómez-Salvador R, Lamo A (2005) 5. The determinants of labour force participation in the European Union1. In: Labour supply and incentives to work in Europe, p 195Google Scholar
  27. Genre V, Gómez Salvador R, Lamo A (2010) European women: Why do (n’t) they work? 1. Appl Econ 42(12):1499–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Granger WC, Huang LL (1997) Evaluation of panel data models: some suggestions from time series. Discussion paper 97–10, University of California, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  29. Greene WH (2002) Econometric analysis. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  30. Hayakawa K (2007) Small sample bias properties of the system gmm estimator in dynamic panel data models. Econ Lett 95(1):32–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econom J Econom Soc 47(1):153–161Google Scholar
  32. Hotz VJ, Miller RA (1988) An empirical analysis of life cycle fertility and female labor supply. Econom J Econom Soc 56(1):91–118Google Scholar
  33. Hsiao C (1986) Analysis of panel data. Econometric Society Monograph no. 11. New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  34. Jaumotte F (2003) Labour force participation of women: empirical evidence on the role of policy and other determinants in oecd countries. OECD Econ Stud 2(9):51–108Google Scholar
  35. Judson RA, Owen AL (1999) Estimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for macroeconomists. Econ Lett 65(1):9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Layard R, Nickell S, Jackman R (1991) Unemployment. macroeconomic performance and the labour market, rev. 2005Google Scholar
  37. Lucas RE Jr, Rapping LA (1969) Real wages, employment, and inflation. J Polit Econ 77(5):721–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martin JP (1996) Measures of replacement rates for the purpose of international comparisons: a note. OECD Econ Stud 26(1):99–115Google Scholar
  39. Mincer J (1962) Labor force participation of married women. In: Universities-National Bureau (eds) Aspects of labor economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp 63–106Google Scholar
  40. Moffitt R (1984) Profiles of fertility, labour supply and wages of married women: a complete life-cycle model. Rev Econ Stud 51(2):263–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Möller J, Aldashev A (2006) Interregional differences in labor market participation. Jahrb für Regionalwiss 26(1):25–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mortensen DT, Pissarides CA (1994) Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. Rev Econ Stud 61(3):397–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econom J Econom Soc 49(6):1417–1426Google Scholar
  44. Nickell W (2006) The CEP-OECD institutions data set (1960–2004). Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political ScienceGoogle Scholar
  45. Nickell S, Layard R (1999) Labor market institutions and economic performance. Handb Labor Econ 3:3029–3084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nickell S, Nunziata L (2001) Labour market institutions database. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. OECD (2011) Product market regulation database.https://www.oecd.org/economy/pmr
  48. Pissarides CA (1991) Real wages and unemployment in Australia. Economica 58(229):35–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pissarides C, Garibaldi P, Olivetti C, Petrongolo B, Wasmer E (2005) Women in the labor force: How well is Europe doing?. In: Boeri T, Del Boca D, Pissarides CA, Women at Work: an Economic Perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 7–115Google Scholar
  50. Roodman D (2009a) How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system gmm in stata. Stata J 9(1):86–136Google Scholar
  51. Roodman D (2009b) A note on the theme of too many instruments*. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 71(1):135–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ruhm CJ, Teague JL (1997) Parental leave policies in Europe and North America. Gender and family issues in the workplaceGoogle Scholar
  53. Schaffer M (2010) Xtivreg2: stata module to perform extended iv/2sls, gmm and ac/hac, liml and k-class regression for panel data models. Statistical software components, Boston College, Department of Economics. http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocode:s456501
  54. Schultz TP (1990) Testing the neoclassical model of family labor supply and fertility. J Human Resour 25(4):599–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sevestre P, Trognon A (1985) A note on autoregressive error components models. J Econom 28(2):231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Soto M (2006) System gmm estimation with a small number of individuals. Institute for Economic Analysis, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  57. Tanda P (2001) Politiche sociali: Selettività e universalismo. ISAE ReportGoogle Scholar
  58. Vendrik M (1998) Unstable bandwagon and habit effects on labor supply. J Econ Behav Organ 36(2):235–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Windmeijer F (2005) A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step gmm estimators. J Econom 126(1):25–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Economa AplicadaUniversidade de VigoVigoSpain

Personalised recommendations