Empirical Economics

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 503–535 | Cite as

Taxes, wages and working hours

Article

Abstract

This paper presents estimates of individuals’ responses in hourly wages to changes in marginal tax rates. Estimates based on register panel data of Swedish households covering the period 1992 to 2011 produce significant but relatively small net-of-tax rate elasticities. The results vary with family type, with the largest elasticities obtained for single males and the smallest for married/cohabitant females. Despite these seemingly small elasticities, evaluation of the effects of a reduced state tax using a microsimulation model shows that the effort effect matters. The largest effect is due to changes in number of working hours yet including the effort effect results in an almost self-financed reform. As a reference to the earlier literature, we also estimate taxable income elasticities. As expected, these are larger than for the hourly wage rates. However, both specifications produce significantly and positive income effects. One contribution is related to the definition of the instruments used to solve the well-known problem of endogeneity.

Keywords

Income taxation Hourly wage rates Work effort  Microsimulation 

JEL Classification

C8 D31 H24 J22 J31 

References

  1. Aaberge R, Atkinson AB (2008) Top incomes in Norway. Statistics Norway, research paper no. 552Google Scholar
  2. Aaberge R, Dagsvik JK, Strøm S (1995) Labor supply responses and welfare effects of tax reforms. Scand J Econ 97(4):635–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson C, Antelius J (2010) Jobbskatteavdraget - bra tänkt men illa känt. Ekonomisk Debatt 2010:2Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson AB (2004) Income tax and top incomes over the twentieth century. Hacienda Pública Española, Revista de Economía Pública 168:123–141Google Scholar
  5. Blomquist S, Selin H (2010) Hourly wage rate and taxable labor income responsiveness to changes in marginal tax rates. J Public Econ 94(11–12):878–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blow L, Preston I (2002) Deadweight loss and taxation of earned income: evidence from tax records of the UK self employed. Institute for Fiscal Studies Working Paper WP02/15Google Scholar
  7. Carlin PS, Flood LR (1997) Do children affect the labor supply of Swedish men? Labour Econ 4(2):167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chetty R (2012) Bounds on elasticities with optimization frictions: a synthesis of micro and macro evidence on labour supply. Econometrica 80(3):969–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deaton A (2009) Instruments of development: Randomization in the tropics, and the search for the elusive keys to economic development. Research Program in Development Studies, Center for Health and Wellbeing, Princeton University, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edin PA, Fredriksson P (2000) LINDA—longitudinal individual data for Sweden. Working paper 2000:19, Uppsala Universitet, Nationalekonomiska institutionenGoogle Scholar
  11. Ericson P, Flood LR, Wahlberg R (2009) SWEtaxben: a Swedish tax/benefit micro simulation model and an evaluation of a Swedish tax reform. Working paper no 346 in S-WOPEC, http://swopec.hhs.se/gunwpe/abs/gunwpe0346.htm. Accessed 17 Jul 2014
  12. Feldstein M (1995) The effect of marginal tax rates on taxable income: a panel study of the 1986 tax reform. J Polit Econ 103(3):551–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feldstein M (1999) Tax avoidance and the deadweight loss of the income tax. Rev Econ Stat 81(4):674–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flood LR (1990) Att mäta och estimera utbudet av arbetskraft, I Tid och Råd. IUI of University of Gothenburg, GothenburgGoogle Scholar
  15. Flood LR, Hansen J, Wahlberg R (2004) Household labor supply and welfare participation in Sweden. J Hum Resour 39(4):1008–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flood LR, Wahlberg R, Pylkänen E (2007) From welfare to work: evaluating a proposed tax and benefit reform targeted at single mothers in Sweden. Labour 21(3):443–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gelber AM (2014) Taxation and the earnings of husbands and wives: evidence from Sweden. Rev Econ Stat 96(2):270–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goolsbee A (2000) It’s not about the money: why natural experiments don’t work on the rich. In: Slemrod J (ed) Does Atlas shrug? The economic consequences of taxing the rich. Russell Sage Foundation, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  19. Gruber J, Saez E (2002) The elasticity of taxable income: evidence and implications. J Public Econ 84:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen J, Liu X (2011) Estimating labor supply responses and welfare participation: using a natural experiment to validate a structural labor supply model, IZA discussion paper 5718Google Scholar
  21. Hansson Å (2006) Svensk skattepolitik: Från Pomperipossa via århundradets skattereform till värnskattens utdragna avskaffande. The Swedish model, RATIO, rapport 3Google Scholar
  22. Hansson Å (2007) Taxpayers responsiveness to tax rate changes and implications for the cost of taxation. Int Tax Public Financ 14(5):563–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holmlund B, Söderström M (2011) Estimating dynamic income responses to tax reform. BE J Econ Anal Policy 11(1)Google Scholar
  24. Imbens GW, Wooldridge M (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J Econ Lit 47(1):5–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klevmarken NA (2000) Did the tax cuts increase hours of work? A statistical analysis of a natural experiment. KYKLOS 53:337–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ljunge M, Ragan K (2006) Labor supply and the tax reform of the century? University of Chicago, mimeoGoogle Scholar
  27. MaCurdy T, Green D, Paarsch H (1990) Assessing empirical approaches for analyzing taxes and labor supply. J Hum Resour 25(3):415–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meghir C, Phillips D (2010) Labour supply and taxes. In: Mirlees J et al (eds) Dimensions of tax design, the mirrlees review. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Pronzato C (2012) Comparing quasi-experimental designs and structural models for policy evaluation: the case of a reform of lone parental welfare, IZA discussion paper 6803Google Scholar
  30. Saez E, Slemrod J, Giertz SH (2012) The elasticity of taxable income with respect to marginal tax rates: a critical review. J Econ Lit 50(1):3–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Selén J (1995) Measurement errors in hourly earnings. Paper presented at the conference on methodological issues in official statistics, statistics SwedenGoogle Scholar
  32. Selén J (2005) Taxable income responses to tax changes: panel analyses of Swedish reforms. Mimeo, Trade Union Institute for Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  33. Sillamaa MA, Veall MR (2001) The effect of marginal tax rates on taxable income: a panel study of the 1988 tax flattening in Canada. J Public Econ 80(3):341–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tax Statistical Yearbook of Sweden (2007)Google Scholar
  35. Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Soest A (1995) Structural models of family labor supply. J Hum Resour 30(1):63–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EmpiricaStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and LawUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  3. 3.CEPS/INSTEADEsch-sur-AlzetteLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations