Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 1419–1444 | Cite as

Explaining upper secondary school dropout: new evidence on the role of local labor markets

  • Kristine von SimsonEmail author
Article

Abstract

According to standard human capital theory, local labor market conditions affect individual schooling decisions mainly through two channels: (1) the opportunity cost of schooling, and (2) the returns to education. This paper assesses the impact of both these channels on upper secondary school dropout among Norwegian youth in the period 1994–2006. The effect of local labor market conditions is measured using variation in youth outflow rates from unemployment to employment across regions over time. The results show that local labor market conditions play a substantial role in individual dropout decisions in Norway, with elasticities ranging from 0.1 to 0.3. The opportunity cost of schooling seems to weigh more in the dropout decision for Norwegian youth than the expected returns. However, the results are highly sensitive to the choice of local labor market indicator. When including the unemployment rate, which is the standard indicator used in empirical applications of schooling decisions, instead of the outflow rate, the estimates become smaller and in most cases insignificant. This indicates that previous studies of school dropout may have understated the importance of local labor market conditions.

Keywords

Local labor markets Upper secondary school dropout 

JEL Classification

I21 R23 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is part of the project “The Educational System in Norway”, funded by the Norwegian Research Council. I am grateful for useful comments and suggestions from Erling Barth, Pål Schøne and Steinar Strøm, as well as three anonymous referees.

References

  1. Aparicio A (2010) High-school dropouts and transitory labor market schocks: the case of the Spanish housing boom. IZA Discussion Paper 5139Google Scholar
  2. Arulampalam W, Naylor RA, Smith JP (2004) A hazard model of the probability of medical school drop-out in the UK. J R Stat Soc A 167:157–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Askilden JE, Nilsen ØA (2005) Apprentices and young workers: a study of the Norwegian youth labour market. Scott J Polit Econ 52(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker GS (1964) Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. National Bureau of Economic Research General series, vol 80. National Bureau of Economic Research; distributed by Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Belfield C, Levin H (2007) The economic losses from high school dropouts in California. California Workforce Investment Board, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben-Porath Y (1967) The production of human capital and the life cycle of earnings. J Polit Econ 75(4): 352–365Google Scholar
  7. Black DA, McKinnish TG, Sanders SG (2005) Tight labor markets and the demand for education: evidence from the coal boom and bust. Ind Labor Relat Rev 59(1):3–16Google Scholar
  8. Bradley S, Lenton P (2007) Dropping out of post-compulsory education in the UK: an analysis of determinants and outcomes. J Popul Econ 20(2):299–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campolieti M, Fang T, Gunderson M (2010) Labour market outcomes and skill acquisition of high-school dropouts. J Labor Res 31(1):39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Card D, Lemieux T (2001) Dropout and enrollment trends in the postwar period: what went wrong in the 1970s? In: Gruber J (ed) Risky behavior among youths: an economic analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 439–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlsen F, Johansen K, Roed K (2006) Wage formation, regional migration and local labour market tightness. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 68(4):423–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark D (2011) Do recessions keep students in school? The impact of youth unemployment on enrolment in post-compulsory education in England. Economica 78(311):523–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dellas H, Sakellaris P (2003) On the cyclicality of schooling: theory and evidence. Oxford Econ Pap 55(1):148–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Di Pietro G (2006) Regional labour market conditions and university dropout rates: evidence from Italy. Reg Stud 40(6):617–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans WN, Kim W (2008) The impact of local labor market conditions on the demand for education: evidence from Indian casinos. Working Papers.Google Scholar
  16. Falch T, Borge LE, Lujala P, Nyhus OH, Strøm B (2010) Completion and dropout in upper secondary education in Norway: causes and consequences. Centre for Economic Research at NTNU, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  17. Falch T, Nyhus OH (2009) Frafall fra videregående opplæring og arbeidsmarkedstilknytning for unge voksne. SØF-rapport 07/09Google Scholar
  18. Falch T, Strøm B (2013) Schools, ability and the socioeconomic gradient in education choices. J Socio-Econ 43:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaure S, Røed K (2007) How tight is the labor market? Sources and changes in the aggregate exit rate from unemployment across the business cycle. J Bus Cycle Meas Anal 3(2):155–173Google Scholar
  20. Gjefsen HM (2010) Arbeidsmarkedet og frafall fra videregående opplæring. University of Oslo, OsloGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanushek EA, Woessmann L (2012) Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes and causation. J Econ Growth 17(4):267–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heckman J, Singer B (1984) A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52(2):271–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Høst H (2008) Fag-og yrkesopplæringen i Norge—noen sentrale utviklingstrekk. NIFU Step Rapport 20. NIFU, OsloGoogle Scholar
  24. Jenkins SP (2005) Survival analysis. Unpublished ManuscriptGoogle Scholar
  25. Messer D, Wolter SC (2010) Time-to-degree and the business cycle. Educ Econ 18(1):111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Micklewright J, Pearson M, Smith S (1990) Unemployment and early school leaving. Econ J 100(400): 163–169Google Scholar
  27. Mocetti S (2012) Educational choices and the selection process: before and after compulsory schooling. Educ Econ 20(2):189–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moulton BR (1990) An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Rev Econ Stat 72(2):334–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nicoletti C, Rondinelli C (2010) The (mis)specification of discrete duration models with unobserved heterogeneity: a Monte Carlo study. J Econ 159(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. OECD (2011) Education at a glance: OECD indicatorsGoogle Scholar
  31. OECD (2012) Equity and quality in education—supporting disadvantaged students and schoolsGoogle Scholar
  32. Oreopolous P (2007) Do dropouts drop out too soon? Wealth, health and happiness from compulsory schooling. J Public Econ 91:2213–2229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Petrongolo B, San Segundo MJ (2002) Staying-on at school at 16: the impact of labor market conditions in Spain. Econ Educ Rev 21(4):353–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rees DI, Mocan HN (1997) Labor market conditions and the high school dropout rate: evidence from New York state. Econ Educ Rev 16(2):103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosholm M, Jakobsen V (2003) Dropping out of school? A competing risks analysis of young immigrants’ progress in the educational system. IZA Discussion Paper 918Google Scholar
  36. Trostel P, Walker I, Woolley P (2002) Estimates of the economic return to schooling for 28 countries. Labour Econ 9(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. von Simson K (2012) Pathways to the labor market for high school dropouts: temporary help agencies versus active labor market programs. PhD-thesis, University of Oslo, OsloGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social ResearchOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations