Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 501–524 | Cite as

Supplementary private health insurance and health care utilization of people aged 50+

  • Anikó BíróEmail author
Article

Abstract

Does supplementary private health insurance (PHI) coverage influence health care utilization in countries where the coverage ratio with public health insurance is high? I estimate this effect using the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Handling the potential endogeneity of supplementary insurance coverage and the large fraction of zero observations in the utilization models influences the empirical results. I show that the effect of PHI coverage on inpatient and outpatient care utilization is not trivial even in countries with generous public health funding. The main finding is that supplementary PHI coverage increases dental care utilization, but decreases the visits to general practitioners. Private insurance is estimated to have little and insignificant influence on the utilization of inpatient care and outpatient specialist care. The magnitude of the effect of supplementary PHI on health care utilization varies with the characteristics of the health care systems.

Keywords

Private health insurance Health care utilization SHARE 

JEL Classification

C25 C35 G22 I11 

Notes

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this article was written as part of my Ph.D. thesis at the Central European University. I am grateful for comments and suggestions received at the 5th Nordic Econometric Meeting in Lund, 3rd annual conference of the Hungarian Society of Economics in Budapest, 2nd Health Econometrics Workshop in Rome and from two anonymous referees.

References

  1. Bago d’Uva T, Jones AM (2009) Health care utilisation in Europe: new evidence from the ECHP. J Health Econ 28:265–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Cameron AC, Trivedi K (2009) Microeconometrics using Stata. Stata Press, College Station, TXGoogle Scholar
  4. Cappellari L, Jenkins SP (2006) Calculation of multivariate normal probabilities by simulation, with applications to maximum simulated likelihood estimation. Stata J 6(2):156–189Google Scholar
  5. Deb P, Trivedi PK (1997) Demand for medical care by the elderly: a finite mixture approach. J Appl Econom 12:313–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deb P, Manning W, Norton E (2010) Sample programs for ASHE June 2010 at Cornell University IthacaGoogle Scholar
  7. Dow MH, Norton EC (2003) Choosing between and interpreting the Heckit and two-part models for corner solutions. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 4:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibbons RD, Wilcox-Gok V (1998) Health service utilization and insurance coverage: a multivariate probit analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 93(441):63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greene WH (2003) Econometric analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. Grossman M (1972) On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. J Polit Econ 80:223–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holly A et al. (2005) Out-of-Pocket Payments for Health Care Expenditures. In: Börsch-Supan A et al. (eds) Health, aging and retirement in Europe - first results from the survey on health, aging and retirement in Europe. MEA, Mannheim , pp 126–132Google Scholar
  12. Hullegie P, Klein TJ (2010) The effect of private health insurance on medical care utilization and self-assessed health in Germany. Health Econ 19(9):1048–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hunt-McCool J, Kiker BF, Ng YC (1994) Estimates of the demand for medical care under different functional forms. J Appl Econom 9(2):201–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones AM (2000) Handbook of health economics. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP (eds) Health econometrics, vol 1, chap 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 265–344Google Scholar
  15. Jones AM, Koolman X, van Doorslaer E (2006) The impact of having supplementary private health insurance on the use of specialists. Ann Écon Stat 83(84):251–275Google Scholar
  16. Manning WG et al (1987) Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment. Am Econ Rev 77(3):251–277Google Scholar
  17. Mossialos E, Thomson S (2004) Voluntary health insurance in the European Union. WHO, European Observatory on Health Systems and PoliciesGoogle Scholar
  18. Norton EC, Dow WH, Do YK (2008) Specification tests for the sample selection and two-part models. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 8:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD (2004) Private Health Insurance in OECD Countries. The OECD Health ProjectGoogle Scholar
  20. Paccagnella O, Rebba V, Weber G (2012) Voluntary private health care insurance among the over fifties in Europe: a comparative analysis of SHARE data. Health Econ. doi: 10.1002/hec.2800
  21. Pohlmeier W, Ulrich V (1995) An econometric model of the two-part decisionmaking process in the demand for health care. J Hum Resour 30(2):339–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rodríguez M, Stoyanova A (2004) The effect of private insurance access on the choice of GP/specialist and public/private provider in Spain. Health Econ 13(7):689–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Terza JV (1998) Estimating count data models with endogenous switching: sample selection and endogenous treatment effects. J Econom 84:129–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Terza JV, Basu A, Rathouz PJ (2008) Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. J Health Econ 27:531–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thomson S, Foubister T, Mossialos E (2009) Financing health care in the European Union. WHO, European Observatory on Health Systems and PoliciesGoogle Scholar
  26. Werblow A, Felder S, Zweifel P (2007) Population ageing and health care expenditure: a school of ’red herrings’? Health Econ 16:1109–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zimmerman Murphy M (1987) The importance of sample selection bias in the estimation of medical care equations. East Econ J 13:19–29Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations