Empirical Economics

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 1167–1187 | Cite as

Empirical identification of perceived congestion



This paper investigates the empirical identification of perceived congestion and mitigating behavior using observational data. Congestion effects are identified using a procedure based upon a nonlinear function of the choice attributes combined with an equilibrium condition on the sorting behavior of participants. Results suggest that congestion effects can be identified, under certain assumptions, using only revealed preference data, and that ignoring these effects underestimates the strength of preferences for other attributes. The model is applied to data on rock climbers, and the resulting estimates used to simulate the reopening of a currently closed section of a popular NY rock-climbing area and the re-sorting of climbers that would result.


Random utility model Congestion Travel cost Non-market valuation 

JEL Classification

C35 Q24 Q26 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bayer P, Timmins C (2005) On the equilibrium properties of locational sorting models. J Urban Econ 57: 462–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayer P, Timmins C (2007) Estimating equilibrium models of sorting across locations. Econ J 117: 353–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boxall PC, Hauer G, Adamowicz W (2001) Modeling congestion as a form of interdependence in random utility models. Department of Rural Economy. University of Manitoba. Staff paper 05-01Google Scholar
  4. Brock W, Durlauf S (2001) Discrete choice with social interactions. Rev Econ Stud 68: 235–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brock W, Durlauf S (2003) Multinomial choice with social interactions. NBER Working Paper no. 288. http://www.nber.org/papers/t0288. Accessed 7/2012
  6. Cicchetti CJ, Smith VK (1976) The costs of congestion: an econometric analysis of wilderness recreation. Ballinger, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Grijalva T, Berrens R, Bohara A, Jakus P, Shaw WD (2002) Valuing the loss of access to rock climbing in wilderness areas: a national-level random utility model. Land Econ 78(1): 103–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. von Haefen R, Phaneuf DJ (2008) Identifying demand parameters in the presence of unobservables: a combined revealed and stated preference approach. J Environ Econ Manag 56: 19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanley N, Koop G, Wright R, Alvarez-Farizo B, Nevin C (2000) Go climb a mountain: an application of recreation demand models to rock climbing in Scotland. J Agric Econ 52(1): 36–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanley N, Alvarez-Farizo B, Shaw WD (2003a) Using economic instruments to manage access to rock-climbing sites in the Scottish Highlands. In: Hanley, Shaw WD, Wright RE (eds) The new economics of outdoor recreation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 40–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanley N, Shaw WD, Wright RE (2003b) The new economics of outdoor recreation. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jakus P, Shaw WD (1997) Congestion at recreation areas. J Environ Manag 50: 389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morey ER (1985) Characteristics, consumer surplus, and new activities: a proposed ski area. J Public Econ 26(2): 221–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Murdock J (2006) Handling unobserved site characteristics in random utility models of recreation demand. J Environ Econ Manag 51: 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. O’Hara M (2012) Congestion effects in a seasonal model of recreation demand (March 21, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2027137
  16. Phaneuf DJ, Carbone JC, Herriges JA (2009) Non-price equilibria for non-marketed goods. J Environ Econ Manag 57: 45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shaw WD, Jakus P (1996) Travel cost models of the demand for rock climbing. Agric Resour Econ Rev 25(2): 133–142Google Scholar
  18. Shelby B (1980) Crowding models for backcountry recreation. Land Econ 56(1): 43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Swain T (1995) The Gunks guide, 3rd edn. Falcon Publishing, HelenaGoogle Scholar
  20. Timmins C, Murdock J (2007) A revealed preference approach to the measurement of congestion in travel cost models. J Environ Econ Manag 53(2): 230–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsColgate UniversityHamiltonUSA

Personalised recommendations