Empirical Economics

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 817–829

Re-examining the “twin deficits” hypothesis: evidence from Australia

Article

Abstract

This paper re-examines the relationship between fiscal imbalances and net foreign borrowing. A general analytical approach is first developed which suggests that, other things equal, a rise (fall) in any advanced economy’s fiscal deficit should be fully matched by a rise (fall) in its net foreign borrowing, in accordance with the so-called twin deficits hypothesis. In the case of Australia, one of the world’s largest foreign borrower economies for its size, empirical estimation yields the novel result that Australia’s consolidated budget imbalance and its foreign borrowing were approximately twinned on the basis of quarterly data for 1983–2009, when Australia’s exchange rate floated and international capital mobility was high. This result is consistent with the conceptual framework and suggests that fiscal policy is likely to be ineffective as an instrument for influencing the real economy.

Keywords

Fiscal imbalances Twin deficits Australia 

JEL Classification

E62 F32 H62 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews D (1993) Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica 61: 821–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews D, Ploberger W (1994) Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica 62: 1383–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auerbach A, Gale W, Harris B (2010) Activist fiscal policy. J Econ Perspect 24(4): 141–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australian National Accounts, Catalogue No. 5206. Australian Government Printing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Balance of Payments and International Investment Position, Australia, Catalogue No. 5302. Australian Government Printing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  6. Australian Treasury (2011) Commonwealth Budget 2011–2012, Australian Government Printing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  7. Barro R (1974) Are government bonds net wealth?. J Political Econ 81: 1095–1117Google Scholar
  8. Chinn M, Prasad E (2003) Medium term determinants of current accounts in industrial and developing countries: an empirical exploration. J Int Econ 59: 47–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corsetti G, Muller G (2006) Twin deficits: squaring theory, evidence and common sense”. Econ Policy 48: 597–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dibooglu S (1997) Accounting for US current account deficits: an empirical investigation. Appl Econ 29(6): 787–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55: 251–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fleming J (1962) Domestic financial policy under fixed and floating exchange rates. IMF Staff Papers 9(3): 79–369Google Scholar
  13. Gregory A, Hansen B (1996) Residual based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. J Econ 70: 99–126Google Scholar
  14. Hansen B (1997) Approximate asymptotic p-values for structural-change tests. J Bus Econ Stat 15: 60–67Google Scholar
  15. Hatemi JA (2008) Tests for cointegration with two unknown regime shifts with an application to the financial market integration. Empir Econ 35: 497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim S, Roubini N (2008) Twin deficits or twin divergence? Fiscal policy, current account, and real exchange rate in the US. J Int Econ 74: 362–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kraay A, Ventura J (2000) Current accounts in debtor and creditor countries. Q J Econ 115: 1137–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Makin A (2003) Global finance and the macroeconomy. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  19. Makin A (2004) The current account, fiscal policy and medium run income determination. Contemp Econ Policy (22):309–317Google Scholar
  20. Makin A (2009) Global imbalances, exchange rates, and stabilization policy. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mankiw G (2012) Macroeconomics, 8th edn. Worth, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Masson P, Bayoumi T, Samiei H (1998) International evidence on the determinants of private saving. World Bank Econ Rev 12: 483–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mundell R (1963) Capital mobility and stabilization policy under fixed and flexible exchange rates. Can J Econ Political Sci 29(4): 475–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Narayan P, Popp S (2009) A new unit root test with two structural breaks in level and slope at unknown time. J Appl Stat 37(9): 1425–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Narayan P, Smyth R (2005) Structural breaks and unit roots in Australian macroeconomic time series. Pac Econ Rev 10: 421–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nason J, Rogers J (2002) Investment and the current account in the short run and the long run. J Money, Credit Bank 34:967–986Google Scholar
  27. Normandin M (1999) Budget deficit persistence and the twin deficits hypothesis. J Int Econ 49: 171–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Phillips P (1987) Times series regression with a unit root. Econometrica 55(2):277–301Google Scholar
  29. Ricciutti R (2003) Assessing Ricardian equivalence. J Econ Surv 17(1): 55–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seater J (1993) Ricardian equivalence. J Econ Lit 31(1): 142–190Google Scholar
  31. United Nations (2009) System of National Accounts, 2008. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Griffith Business SchoolGriffith UniversityGold CoastAustralia
  2. 2.Financial Econometrics Group, School of Accounting, Economics and FinanceDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations