Empirical Economics

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 157–178 | Cite as

Linking investment spikes and productivity growth

Open Access
Article

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between productivity growth and investment spikes using Census Bureau’s plant-level dataset for the U.S. food manufacturing industry. There are differences in productivity growth and investment spike patterns across different sub-industries and food manufacturing industry in general. Our study finds empirical support for the learning-by-doing hypothesis by identifying some cases where the impact of investment spikes on TFP growth presents a U-shaped investment age–productivity growth pattern. However, efficiency and the learning period associated with investment spikes differ among plants across industries. The most pronounced impact of investment age on productivity growth (5.3 % for meat products, 4% for dairy products, and 2.8 % in all food manufacturing plants) occurs during the fifth year of post-investment spike. Thus, in general, the productivity gains tend to be fully realized with a 5-year technology learning period for this industry.

Keywords

Productivity growth Lumpy investments Micro data U.S. Food industry 

JEL Classification

D24 L66 033 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Support for this research from United States Department of Agriculture/National Research Initiative (award no. 03-35400-12949) is gratefully acknowledged.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

References

  1. Ackerberg DA, Caves K, Frazer G (2006) Structural identification of production functions. Working Paper, University of California Los Angles, Los Angles, CAGoogle Scholar
  2. Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247((4945): 920–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bahk B, Gort M (1993) Decomposing learning by doing. J Polit Econ 101: 561–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartelsman E, Dhrymes PJ (1998) Productivity dynamics: U.S. manufacturing plants, 1972–1986. J Prod Anal 9(1):5–34Google Scholar
  5. Bartelsman E, Gray W (1996) NBER manufacturing productivity database. Technical Working Paper No. 205. National Bureau of Economic Research, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumol WJ, Wolfe EN (1983) Feedback from productivity growth to R&D. Scand J Econ 85(2): 147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bessen EJ (1999) New plants and natural experiments in economics adjustment: adjustment costs, learning-by-doing and lumpy investment. Working Paper, Boston University, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. Caballero R, Engle E, Haltiwanger JC (1995) Plant-level adjustment and aggregate investment dynamics. Brookings Pap Econ Activity 2: 1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell J (1998) Entry, exit, embodied technology, and business cycles. Rev Econ Dyn 1(2): 371–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooley T, Greenwood J, Yorukoglu M (1997) The replacement problem. J Monet Econ 40(3): 457–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper R, Haltiwanger JC (2006) On the nature of capital adjustment costs. Rev Econ Stud 73: 611–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper R, Haltiwanger JC, Power L (1999) Machine replacement and the business cycle: lumps and bumps. Am Econ Rev 89(4): 921–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Long B, Summers L (1991) Equipment investment and economic growth. Quart J Econ 106: 445–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhrymes PJ (1991) The structure of production technology: productivity and aggregation effects. US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper No. CES-WP-91-5, Center for Economic Studies, US Bureau of Census, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Doms M, Dunne T (1998) Capital adjustment patterns in manufacturing plants. Rev Econ Dyn 1: 409–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ericson R, Pakes A (1995) Markov perfect industry dynamics: a framework for empirical work. Rev Econ Stud 62(1): 53–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geylani PC, Stefanou SE (2011) Productivity growth patterns in U.S. dairy products manufacturing. Appl Econ 43(24):3415–3482Google Scholar
  18. Greenwood J, Jovanovic B (2001) Accounting for growth. In: Hulten CR, Dean ER, Harper MJ (eds) New developments in productivity analysis, National Bureau of Economic Research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 179–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenwood J, Hercowitz Z, Krusell P (1997) Macroeconomic implications of investment specific technological change. Am Econ Rev 87: 342–362Google Scholar
  20. Harris MJ (2002) Food manufacturing. U.S. Food Marketing System, AER-811, Economic Research Service, USDA, pp 3–9Google Scholar
  21. Hsiao C (1989) Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Huggett M, Ospina S (2001) Does productivity growth fall after the adoption of new technology?. J Monet Econ 48(1): 173–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iranzo S, Schivardi F, Tosetti E (2008) Skill dispersion and firm productivity: an analysis with employer-employee matched data. J Labor Econ 26: 247–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jovanovic B (1982) Selection and evolution of industry. Econometrica 50(3): 649–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jovanovic B, Nyarko Y (1996) Learning-by-doing and the choice of technology. Econometrica 64(6): 1299–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klenow P (1998) Learning curves and the cyclical behaviour of manufacturing industries. Rev Econ Dynam 1: 531–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev Econ Stud 70(2, 243): 317–342Google Scholar
  28. Marschak J, Andrews WH (1944) Random simultaneous equations and the theory of production. Econometrica 12: 143–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morrison CJ (1997) Structural change, capital investment and productivity in the food processing industry. Am J Agric Econ 79(1): 110–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nilsen OA, Schiantarelli F (2003) Zeros and lumps in investment: empirical evidence on irreversibility and nonconvexities. Rev Econ Stat 85(4): 1021–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olley GS, Pakes A (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunication equipment industry. Econometrica 64(6): 1263–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pakes A, Ericson R (1998) Empirical implications of alternative models of firm dynamics. J Econ Theory 79(1): 1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pakes A, McGuire P (1994) Computing markov-perfect nash equilibria: numerical implications of a dynamic differentiated product model. RAND J Econ 25(4): 555–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parente S (1994) Technology adoption, learning by doing, and economic growth. J Econ Theory 63: 346–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Power L (1994) Causes and consequences of investment spikes in U.S. manufacturing plants. Dissertation, University of MarylandGoogle Scholar
  36. Power L (1998) The missing link: technology, investment, and productivity. Rev Econ Stat 80(2): 300–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sakellaris P (2004) Patterns of plant adjustment. J Monet Econ 51(2): 425–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Solow RM (1993) Policies for economic growth. In: Tinbergen J, Knoester A, Wellink AHEM (eds) Tinbergen lectures on economic policy. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 127–140Google Scholar
  39. Yorukoglu M (1998) The information technology productivity paradox. Rev Econ Dynam 1: 551–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Palumbo-Donahue Schools of BusinessDuquesne UniversityPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural SociologyPennsylvania State University and Business Economics GroupUniversity ParkUSA
  3. 3.Wageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations