Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 1673–1695 | Cite as

Can sickness absence be affected by information meetings? Evidence from a social experiment

  • Per Johansson
  • Erica Lindahl
Article

Abstract

During the last decade several empirical studies have stressed the importance of norms and social interactions for explaining sickness-absence behavior. In this context, public discussions about the intentions of the insurance, and of the rights and duties of the receivers, may be important for reducing the sickness absence. In this article, we study whether information meetings about the Swedish sickness insurance affect the length of sickness-absence spells. The study is based on experimental data on individuals with weak labor market attachments. The displacement of when the call to the meeting was sent out was randomized. Comparing the survival functions of those called immediately with those whose calls were delayed (by about 30 days) makes it possible to study whether the length of sickness absence is affected by receiving the call earlier. The result suggests that the length is reduced by, on average, 20%. In the long term (12 months later), there is no effect of the information meeting. This suggests that attendance to the information meeting does not change individuals’ long-term behavior.

Keywords

Monitoring Moral hazard Public social insurance Survival analysis Instrumental variables 

JEL Classification

C93 H51 H55 J22 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angrist JD, Krueger AB (1999) Empirical strategies in labor economics. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D Handbook of labor economics. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrelöv B, Edlund C, Goine H (2006) Grindvakterna och sjukförsäkringen—samspel och motspel i SKA Projektet: Sjukförsäkring, kulturer och attityder. Palmer E (ed) Försäkringskassan analyserar 2006(16), Försäkringskassan, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  3. Autor DH, Duggan MG (2006) The growth in the social security disability rolls: a fiscal crisis unfolding. J Econ Perspect 20(3): 71–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black DA, Smith JA, Berger MC, Brett JN (2003) Is the threat of reemployment services more effective than the services themselves? Evidence from random assignment in the UI system. Am Econ Rev 93(4): 1313–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox D (1972) Regression models and life-tables with discussion. J R Stat Soc B 34: 187–220Google Scholar
  6. Englund L (2001) Förändringar i distriktsläkarnas sjukskrivningspraxis mellan åren 1996 och 2001 i ett svenskt landsting. Centrum för Klinisk Forskning Dalarna, FalunGoogle Scholar
  7. European Economic Advisory Group (2007) Scandinavia today: an economic miracle? In: Report on the European Economy 2007 IFO—Institute for Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  8. Försäkringskassan (2006) Sjukförsäkring, kulturer och attityder. Fyra aktörers perspektiv. Försäkringskassan analyserar 2006:16Google Scholar
  9. Frölich M (2007) Nonparametric IV estimation of local average treatment effects with covariates. J Econom 139: 35–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geerdsen LP (2006) Is there a threat effect of labor market programmes? A study of ALMP in the Danish UI system. Econ J R Econ Soc 116(513): 738–750Google Scholar
  11. Grambesch AM, Therneau TM (1994) Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 1994 81(3): 515–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenwood M (1926) The Natural Duration of Cancer, Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects. 33:1–26, His Majesty’s Stationery Office: LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Hall C, Hartman L (2010) Moral hazard among the sick and unemployed: evidence from a Swedish social insurance reform. Empir Econ 39: 27–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henningsen M (2006) Moving between welfare payments. The case of sickness insurance for the unemployed, memorandum 04. 2006. Department of Economics, University of OsloGoogle Scholar
  15. Hesselius P, Johansson P, Nilsson P (2009) Sick of your colleagues’s absence?. J Eur Econ Assoc 7(2–3): 1–12Google Scholar
  16. Ichino A, Maggi G (2000) Work environment and individual background: explaining regional shirking differentials in a large italian firm. Quart J Econ 115: 1057–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karlstrom A, Palme M, Svensson I (2007) The employment effect of stricter rules for eligibility for DI: Evidence from a natural experiment in Sweden. J Pub Econ 92(2008): 2071–2082Google Scholar
  18. Krueger A, Meyer B (2002) Labor supply effects of social insurance. In: Aurebach A, Feldstein M (eds) Handbook of public economics, vol. 4. North-HollandGoogle Scholar
  19. Larsson L (2006) Sick of being unemployed? Interactions between unemployment and sickness insurance. Scand J Econ 108: 97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindbeck A, Nyberg S (2006) Raising children to work hard: altruism, work norms and social insurance. Quart J Econ 4: 2006Google Scholar
  21. Lindbeck A, Persson S (2010) A continuous theory of income insurance. Working Paper 3097 CESifo Munic, June 2010Google Scholar
  22. Lindbeck A, Nyberg S, Weibull G (2003) Social norms and welfare state dynamics. J Eur Econ Assoc 1: 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lindbeck A, Palme M, Persson M (2004) Sjukskrivning som ett socialt fenomen. Ekonomisk Debatt 32Google Scholar
  24. Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22: 719–748Google Scholar
  25. Rosholm M, Svarer M (2004) Estimating the threat effect of active labor market programmes. IZA DP 1300Google Scholar
  26. Sjögren, Lindquist G, Wadensjö E (2006) Kompletterande ersättningar vid inkomstbortfall och arbetslinjen. In: Olofsson J, Zavisic M (eds) Vägar till en öppnare arbetsmarknad. Arbetslivsinstitutets årsbok 2006:124-130Google Scholar
  27. SOU (2007) Arbetslösa som blir sjuka och sjuka som inte blir arbetslösa—samtal om socialförsäkringen 16. Socialförsäkringsutredningen, Statens offentliga utredningarGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Uppsala UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations