Empirical Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 1407–1434 | Cite as

Liberalisation, competition and innovation in the postal sector

Article

Abstract

This paper empirically assesses the effect of liberalisation and competition on innovation in the postal sector. The analysis is restricted to end-to-end competition. The effect on the incentives to innovate of letter volume, public ownership and other control variables is also tested. Data on liberalisation, competition and innovation in the postal sector is collected for seventeen European countries over eleven years. Three measures are used as proxies for innovation: (1) an innovation index based on a survey conducted for this purpose; (2) the accumulated number of innovations (based on the same survey); and (3) labour productivity. We also develop a liberalisation index to measure the percentage of market liberalised (in terms of letter volume). Several models are estimated by GLS. In general, the models estimated have a high explanatory power. We find evidence that market liberalisation has a positive effect on innovation and that an increase in the market share of the competitors stimulates the investment in innovation, at least until the market share of the competitors reaches a certain threshold. Letter volume is also significant and has a positive impact on innovation. GDP per capita turns out to be significant and has a positive relationship with innovation in all the models estimated.

Keywords

Liberalisation Competition Innovation Postal sector 

JEL Classification

L10 O30 L87 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship. Q J Econ 701–728Google Scholar
  2. Arrow K (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson RThe rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur D. Little Limited (2004) Technology and innovation in the postal sector—a competitive market reviewGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumol W, Panzar JC, Willig RD (1982) Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Blundell R, Griffith R, Reenen JV (1999) Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev Econ Stud 66: 529–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boone J (2000) Competitive pressure: the effects on investments in product and process innovation. RAND J Econ 31: 549–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boone J (2001) Intensity of competition and the incentive to innovate. Int J Indus Org 19: 705–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boone J, Dijk TV (1998) Competition and innovation. De Economist 3: 445–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bundesnetzagentur (2006) Ninth market study—Letter market. MainzGoogle Scholar
  10. Cellini R, Lambertini L (2005) R&D Incentives under bertrand competition: a differential game. In: Horacek P, Simand M, Zitek P (eds) Preprints of the 16th IFAC world congress PragueGoogle Scholar
  11. Eccles R, Kuipers P (2006) A comparative study of the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and Sweden. In: Topics in regulatory economics and policyGoogle Scholar
  12. ECORYS (2005) Development of competition in the European postal sector. RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  13. Felisberto C (2007) The effect of competition on innovation in the network industries. In: 6th conference on applied infrastructure research. TU BerlinGoogle Scholar
  14. Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. IPC (2007) Postal regulatory database, country directory 2007—version 6Google Scholar
  16. Jamasb T, Pollitt MG (2011) Electricity sector liberalisation and innovation: an analysis of the UK’s patenting activities. Res Policy 40(2): 309–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (1975) Market structure and innovation: a survey. J Econ Lit 13: 1–37Google Scholar
  18. Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (1976) On the degree of rivalry for maximum innovative activity. Quart J Econ 90: 245–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee T, Wilde LL (1980) Market structure and innovation: a reformulation. Quart J Econ 94: 429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loury GC (1979) Market structure and innovation. Quart J Econ 93: 395–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. NERA (2004) Economics of postal services. LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Nickell SJ (1996) Competition and corporate performance. J Polit Econ 104: 724–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Price Waterhouse (1997) Employment trends in the European postal sectorGoogle Scholar
  24. Price Waterhouse Coopers (1997) Employment trends in the European postal sectorGoogle Scholar
  25. Romer P. (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98: S71–S102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scherer FM (1967) Research and development resource allocation under rivalry. Quart J Econ 81: 359–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. WIK: (2004) Main developments in the European postal sector. Bad Honnef, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  29. WIK: (2005) The evolution of the regulatory model for european postal services. Bad Honnef, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  30. WIK: (2006) Main developments in the postal sector (2004–2006). Bad Honnef, GermanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), EPFL CDM MIRLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations